Literature DB >> 14633757

Randomized, controlled, cross-over clinical trial comparing intravenous midazolam sedation with nitrous oxide sedation in children undergoing dental extractions.

K E Wilson1, N M Girdler, R R Welbury.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of benzodiazepines for paediatric dental sedation has received limited attention with regard to research into clinical effectiveness. A study was therefore designed to investigate the use of midazolam, for i.v. sedation in paediatric dental patients.
METHOD: The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of i.v. midazolam in a randomized, controlled, cross-over trial. Children aged 12-16 yr (ASA I and II), requiring two appointments for equivalent but contralateral dental extractions for orthodontic purposes, were recruited. Conscious sedation with either i.v. midazolam titrated at 0.5 mg x min(-1), to a maximum of 5 mg, or nitrous oxide/oxygen titrated to 30%/70% inhalation sedation was used at the first visit, the alternative being used at the second visit. Vital signs including blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation and ventilatory frequency, as well as sedation levels and behavioural scores, were recorded every 2 min.
RESULTS: Forty patients, mean age 13.2 yr (range 12-16 yr), participated in the trial. A mean dose of midazolam 2.8 mg was administered in the test group. The median time to the maximum level of sedation was 8 min for midazolam compared with 6 min for nitrous oxide (P<0.001). Vital signs for both treatments were comparable and within acceptable clinical limits and communication with the patient was maintained at all times. The median (range) lowest arterial oxygen saturation level recorded for midazolam was 97 (91-99)% compared with 97 (92-100)% for nitrous oxide. The mean (range) recovery time for midazolam was 51.6 (39-65) min and 23.3 (20-34) min for nitrous oxide (P<0.0001). Fifty-one per cent said they preferred i.v. midazolam, 38% preferred nitrous oxide, and 11% had no preference.
CONCLUSION: I.V. midazolam sedation (0.5 mg x min(-1) to a maximum of 5 mg) appears to be as effective as nitrous oxide sedation in 12-16-yr-old healthy paediatric dental patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14633757     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeg278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  19 in total

1.  A comparison of the sedative effect of oral versus nasal midazolam combined with nitrous oxide in uncooperative children.

Authors:  I E Musani; N V Chandan
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2015-05-05

2.  Technical outcome of root canal treatment on permanent teeth in children: a retrospective study.

Authors:  P Clarke; A D C Jones; F Jarad; S Albadri
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2015-04-18

Review 3.  Techniques to administer oral, inhalational, and IV sedation in dentistry.

Authors:  Diana Krystyna Harbuz; Michael O'Halloran
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2016-02-29

Review 4.  The use of anaesthetic agents to provide anxiolysis and sedation in dentistry and oral surgery.

Authors:  Michael O'Halloran
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2013-12-31

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of medications used for moderate sedation.

Authors:  Tong J Gan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Evaluation of masseter muscle electromyography after surgical extraction of third molar.

Authors:  Chan-Woo Kim; Seong-Gon Kim; Sung-Wook Park; Young-Joon Chee
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-02-13

7.  Can intravenous conscious sedation with midazolam be effective at facilitating surgical dentistry in adolescent orthodontic patients? A service evaluation.

Authors:  A J Stamp; M L Dorman; C R Vernazza; G Deeming; C Reid; K E Wilson; N M Girdler
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  Procedural sedation analgesia.

Authors:  Saad A Sheta
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2010-01

9.  Current sedation practice among general dental practitioners and dental specialists in Jordan: an example of a developing country.

Authors:  Mohammad H Al-Shayyab; Soukaina Ryalat; Najla Dar-Odeh; Firas Alsoleihat
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 10.  The role of systematic reviews in pharmacovigilance planning and Clinical Trials Authorisation application: example from the SLEEPS trial.

Authors:  Carrol Gamble; Andrew Wolf; Ian Sinha; Catherine Spowart; Paula Williamson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.