Literature DB >> 14663801

Types, frequencies, and risk factors for complications after third molar extraction.

Chi H Bui1, Edward B Seldin, Thomas B Dodson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to identify the types, frequency, and risk factors for complications after third molar (M3) extractions. STUDY
DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study consisted of patients who had 1 or more M3s removed between 1996 and 2001. Risk factors were grouped into demographic, general health, anatomic, and operative. Outcome variables were operative or inflammatory complications. Data were analyzed using descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate statistics.
RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 583 patients (57.0% male) with a mean age of 26.4 +/- 8.4 years. The overall complication rate was 4.6%. Increasing age, a positive medical history, and the position of the M3 relative to the inferior alveolar nerve were associated with an increased risk for complications.
CONCLUSION: While age, medical history, and M3 anatomy cannot be altered directly, these factors may be modified indirectly, resulting in a potential decrease for postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14663801     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  86 in total

1.  Mythbusters and wisdom teeth.

Authors:  Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Autologous Platelet Concentrates to improve post extraction outcomes.

Authors:  Nirmal Shah; Mark Cairns
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2018-12

Review 3.  Common risk factors for postoperative pain following the extraction of wisdom teeth.

Authors:  Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-23

4.  Cost effectiveness modelling of a 'watchful monitoring strategy' for impacted third molars vs prophylactic removal under GA: an Australian perspective.

Authors:  A A Anjrini; E Kruger; M Tennant
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Juliet Hounsome; Gerlinde Pilkington; James Mahon; Angela Boland; Sophie Beale; Eleanor Kotas; Tara Renton; Rumona Dickson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Piezoelectric bone surgery in the treatment of an osteoma associated with an impacted inferior third molar: a case report.

Authors:  Salvatore D'Amato; Nicola Sgaramella; Laura Vanore; Pasquale Piombino; Giovanni Dell'Aversana Orabona; Mario Santagata
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-01

7.  A prospective study of clinical outcomes related to third molar removal or retention.

Authors:  Greg J Huang; Joana Cunha-Cruz; Marilynn Rothen; Charles Spiekerman; Mark Drangsholt; Loren Anderson; Gayle A Roset
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Recommendations for third molar removal: a practice-based cohort study.

Authors:  Joana Cunha-Cruz; Marilynn Rothen; Charles Spiekerman; Mark Drangsholt; Lyle McClellan; Greg J Huang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Factors influencing lingual nerve paraesthesia following third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  H S Charan Babu; Praveen B Reddy; Rajesh Kumar B Pattathan; Rajendra Desai; A B Shubha
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-08-24

10.  Evaluation of different mandibular blocks for the removal of lower third molars: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Carolina-Noemi Cavallini; Jorge Toledano-Serrabona; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.