| Literature DB >> 24533156 |
Zumin Shi1, Shiqi Zhen2, Gary A Wittert3, Baojun Yuan2, Hui Zuo2, Anne W Taylor3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Riboflavin (vitamin B2) has been shown in animal studies to affect the absorption and metabolism of iron. Cross-sectional population studies show a relationship between riboflavin intake and anemia but prospective population studies are limited. The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between riboflavin intake and the risk of anemia in a Chinese cohort.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24533156 PMCID: PMC3923059 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Sample description.
Baseline sample characteristics according to quartiles of riboflavin intake (n = 1253).
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | p | |
| (n = 313) | (n = 313) | (n = 313) | (n = 314) | ||
| Age | 51.3(14.0) | 49.9(13.0) | 48.9(12.7) | 47.4(12.6) | 0.002 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.3(3.7) | 23.5(3.5) | 23.6(3.4) | 23.3(2.9) | 0.671 |
| Overweight/obesity (%) (BMI≥24 kg/m2) | 38.2 | 40.3 | 44.4 | 37.8 | 0.314 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 13.0(1.7) | 13.0(1.7) | 13.3(1.7) | 13.5(1.9) | <0.001 |
| Ferritin (µg/l) | 81.1(66) | 93.4(78.7) | 104.3(81.8) | 111.1(89.7) | <0.001 |
| Ferritin <15 µg/l (%) | 10.0 | 8.7 | 8.4 | 6.8 | 0.001 |
| Nutrient intake | |||||
| Energy (kcal) | 1841.9(460.4) | 2210.5(458.6) | 2512.8(575.2) | 2766.2(677.7) | <0.001 |
| Fat (g/d) | 59.8(24.5) | 74.4(28.2) | 90.3(35.2) | 101.7(39.6) | <0.001 |
| Protein (g/d) | 53(12.2) | 66.5(12.7) | 78.1(15.4) | 92.1(23.3) | <0.001 |
| Total iron (mg/d) | 19.3(7.6) | 21.9(6.2) | 25.9(7.3) | 32.5(11.1) | <0.001 |
| Non-heme iron (mg/d) | 18.2(7.9) | 20.1(6.5) | 23.3(7.4) | 27.8(11.5) | <0.001 |
| Heme iron (mg/d) | 1.1(1.2) | 1.8(1.9) | 2.6(3) | 4.7(5.7) | <0.001 |
| Vitamin C (mg/d) | 45.3(22.9) | 63.4(33.3) | 66.5(33.5) | 84.8(45.5) | <0.001 |
| Riboflavin (mg/d) | 0.5(0.1) | 0.7(0) | 0.8(0.1) | 1.3(0.3) | <0.001 |
| Fiber (g/d) | 10.3(9.6) | 10.5(7.9) | 11.2(6.5) | 14.4(12.1) | <0.001 |
| Alcohol intake (g/d) | 0.7(3.7) | 1.4(4.9) | 2(5.6) | 3.1(6.1) | <0.001 |
| Women (%) | 77.7 | 63.9 | 49.5 | 42.8 | <0.001 |
| Anemia (baseline) (%) | 30.9 | 32.6 | 31.0 | 28.4 | 0.730 |
| Hypertension (%) | 31.8 | 28.1 | 33.5 | 29.7 | 0.475 |
| Smoker (%) | 16.9 | 21.4 | 30.4 | 39.6 | <0.001 |
| Alcohol drinker (%) | 12.4 | 18.2 | 30.0 | 38.3 | <0.001 |
| Education | |||||
| Low (%) | 64.3 | 57.5 | 53.7 | 39.6 | |
| Medium (%) | 28.0 | 32.6 | 35.8 | 44.7 | <0.001 |
| High (%) | 7.6 | 9.9 | 10.5 | 15.7 | |
| Manual job (%) | 51.6 | 48.6 | 53 | 50.2 | 0.710 |
| Income | |||||
| Low (%) | 34.7 | 27.3 | 19.6 | 18.8 | |
| Medium (%) | 33.4 | 38.6 | 36.9 | 25.2 | <0.001 |
| High (%) | 31.8 | 34.1 | 43.6 | 56.0 |
Values are presented as mean(SD) or percentage.
p values were generated by chi-squared test for categorical variables and ANOVA test for continuous exposures.
Baseline association between riboflavin intake (quartiles) and anemia.
| Riboflavin intake quartiles in 2002 |
| ||||
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||
| (0.5 mg/d) | (0.7 mg/d) | (0.8 mg/d) | (1.3 mg/d) | ||
| All participants (n = 1253) | |||||
| Model 1 | 1 | 1.20(0.94–1.52) | 1.28(0.99–1.67) | 1.36(1.02–1.83) | 0.033 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.13(0.89–1.43) | 1.19(0.91–1.56) | 1.22(0.89–1.69) | 0.201 |
| Men (n = 520) | |||||
| Model 1 | 1 | 1.23(0.73–2.04) | 1.08(0.61–1.90) | 1.34(0.73–2.45) | 0.465 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.15(0.69–1.90) | 0.97(0.53–1.75) | 1.01(0.50–2.05) | 0.821 |
| Women (n = 733) | |||||
| Model 1 | 1 | 1.17(0.90–1.53) | 1.48(1.11–1.97) | 1.50(1.08–2.09) | 0.004 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.13(0.87–1.48) | 1.40(1.04–1.89) | 1.32(0.93–1.88) | 0.046 |
Values are prevalence rate ratio (95% CI) from Poisson regression.
mean riboflavin intake with quartile.
Model 1 adjusted for age (years, as continuous), sex (not adjusted in sex specific model), energy and iron intake.
Model 2 adjusted for age, sex (not adjusted in sex specific model), smoking (0, 1–19, ≥20 cigarettes/day), alcohol drinking (g/day), education (low, medium, high), and occupation (manual/non-manual), overweight (BMI≥24 kg/m2, yes/no), hypertension (yes/no), intake of energy (kcal/day), iron (mg/day), and vitamin C (mg/day) (as continuous variables), for baseline dietary patterns.
Relative risk (95% CI) for anemia at follow-up derived from Poisson regression according to quartiles of baseline riboflavin intake among Chinese adults by anemic status at baseline in Jiangsu Nutrition Study.
| Riboflavin intake quartiles in 2002 | P for trend | ||||
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||
| (0.5 mg/d) | (0.7 mg/d) | (0.8 mg/d) | (1.3 mg/d) | ||
| Non-anemic at baseline (n = 868) | |||||
| Model 1 | 1 | 1.16(0.80–1.68) | 0.83(0.53–1.31) | 0.97(0.61–1.54) | 0.571 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.17(0.81–1.68) | 0.84(0.53–1.33) | 1.00(0.59–1.68) | 0.663 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 1.17(0.81–1.68) | 0.80(0.50–1.28) | 1.00(0.59–1.69) | 0.621 |
| Anemic at baseline (n = 385) | |||||
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.89(0.60–1.32) | 0.61(0.38–0.97) | 0.61(0.37–1.00) | 0.020 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.82(0.54–1.23) | 0.57(0.35–0.93) | 0.52(0.28–0.97) | 0.017 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 0.82(0.54–1.23) | 0.56(0.34–0.93) | 0.52(0.28–0.98) | 0.021 |
Values are prevalence rate ratio (95% CI) from Poisson regression.
mean riboflavin intake with quartile.
Model 1 adjusted for age (years, as continuous), sex, and energy intake.
Model 2 adjusted for age, sex, smoking (0, 1–19, ≥20 cigarettes/day), alcohol drinking (g/day), education (low, medium, high), and occupation (manual/non-manual), overweight (BMI≥24 kg/m2, yes/no), hypertension (yes/no), intake of energy (kcal/day), iron (mg/day), and vitamin C (mg/day) (as continuous variables), and baseline dietary patterns.
Model 3 additional adjusted for dietary patterns (continuous) at follow-up.
Figure 2Interaction between riboflavin intake and iron intake at baseline in relation to anemia at follow up stratified by anemia status at baseline.
Marginsplot syntax was used to make the plot after logistic regression adjusting for age, gender, smoking, energy intake, dietary patterns (continuous), education, income, BMI, and hypertension at baseline. The values represent the adjusted probability of anemia at follow-up. The values of iron intake represent the median intake in each quartile of iron intake. P value for interaction between riboflavin intake and iron intake was 0.008.
Figure 3Interaction between riboflavin intake and iron intake at baseline in relation to anemia at follow up stratified by gender.
Marginsplot syntax was used to make the plot after logistic regression adjusting for age, smoking, energy intake, dietary patterns, education, income, BMI, and hypertension at baseline. Anemia status at baseline was also adjusted in the model. The values of iron intake represent the median intake in each quartile of iron intake. The values represent the adjusted probability of anemia at follow-up. P for interaction between riboflavin and iron intake was 0.016.