Literature DB >> 24532164

Evaluating the equal-interval hypothesis with test score scales.

Ben Domingue1.   

Abstract

The axioms of additive conjoint measurement provide a means of testing the hypothesis that testing data can be placed onto a scale with equal-interval properties. However, the axioms are difficult to verify given that item responses may be subject to measurement error. A Bayesian method exists for imposing order restrictions from additive conjoint measurement while estimating the probability of a correct response. In this study an improved version of that methodology is evaluated via simulation. The approach is then applied to data from a reading assessment intentionally designed to support an equal-interval scaling.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24532164     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-013-9342-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  8 in total

1.  The Rasch model, additive conjoint measurement, and new models of probabilistic measurement theory.

Authors:  G Karabatsos
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2001

2.  Plausible measurement analogies to some psychometric models of test performance.

Authors:  Andrew Kyngdon
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  How accurate are lexile text measures?

Authors:  A Jackson Stenner; Hal Burdick; Eleanor E Sanford; Donald S Burdick
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2006

4.  Attitudes, order and quantity: deterministic and direct probabilistic tests of unidimensional unfolding.

Authors:  Andrew Kyngdon; Ben Richards
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2007

5.  Evaluating the equal-interval hypothesis with test score scales.

Authors:  Ben Domingue
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 6.  Test theory.

Authors:  J A Keats
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Are there limits to binaural additivity of loudness?

Authors:  G Gigerenzer; G Strube
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  A critique of Rasch residual fit statistics.

Authors:  G Karabatsos
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2000
  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  An Approach to Scoring and Equating Tests With Binary Items: Piloting With Large-Scale Assessments.

Authors:  Dimiter M Dimitrov
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Evaluating the equal-interval hypothesis with test score scales.

Authors:  Ben Domingue
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  On Bayesian Testing of Additive Conjoint Measurement Axioms Using Synthetic Likelihood.

Authors:  George Karabatsos
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 4.  All metrics are equal, but some metrics are more equal than others: A systematic search and review on the use of the term 'metric'.

Authors:  Núria Duran Adroher; Birgit Prodinger; Carolina Saskia Fellinghauer; Alan Tennant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.