Literature DB >> 16807496

How accurate are lexile text measures?

A Jackson Stenner1, Hal Burdick, Eleanor E Sanford, Donald S Burdick.   

Abstract

The Lexile Framework for Reading models comprehension as the difference between a reader measure and a text measure. Uncertainty in comprehension rates results from unreliability in reader measures and inaccuracy in text readability measures. Whole-text processing eliminates sampling error in text measures. However, Lexile text measures are imperfect due to misspecification of the Lexile theory. The standard deviation component associated with theory misspecification is estimated at 64L for a standard-length passage (approximately 125 words). A consequence is that standard errors for longer texts (2,500 to 150,000 words) are measured on the Lexile scale with uncertainties in the single digits. Uncertainties in expected comprehension rates are largely due to imprecision in reader ability and not inaccuracies in text readabilities.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16807496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Meas        ISSN: 1529-7713


  11 in total

1.  Transparent measures are essential for coordinating and rewarding quality improvement in healthcare.

Authors:  William P Fisher
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-11-13

2.  Rasch analysis of clinical outcome measures in spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Stefan J Cano; Anna Mayhew; Allan M Glanzman; Kristin J Krosschell; Kathryn J Swoboda; Marion Main; Birgit F Steffensen; Carole Bérard; Françoise Girardot; Christine A M Payan; Eugenio Mercuri; Elena Mazzone; Bakri Elsheikh; Julaine Florence; Linda S Hynan; Susan T Iannaccone; Leslie L Nelson; Shree Pandya; Michael Rose; Charles Scott; Reza Sadjadi; Mackensie A Yore; Cynthia Joyce; John T Kissel
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  Evaluating the equal-interval hypothesis with test score scales.

Authors:  Ben Domingue
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Cognitive Difficulties in Struggling Comprehenders and their Relation to Reading Comprehension: A Comparison of Group Selection and Regression-Based Models.

Authors:  Marcia A Barnes; Karla Stuebing; Jack M Fletcher; Amy Barth; David Francis
Journal:  J Res Educ Eff       Date:  2016-01-29

5.  Development of the International Spinal Cord Injury Basic Data Set for informal caregivers.

Authors:  Carol Haywood; Rebecca Martin; Kathryn Dent; M J Mulcahey
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 2.473

6.  Interventions to Improve Care for Patients with Limited Health Literacy.

Authors:  Rebecca L Sudore; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  J Clin Outcomes Manag       Date:  2009-01-01

7.  The Role of Entropy in Construct Specification Equations (CSE) to Improve the Validity of Memory Tests.

Authors:  Jeanette Melin; Stefan Cano; Leslie Pendrill
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.524

8.  The problem with health measurement.

Authors:  Stefan J Cano; Jeremy C Hobart
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Causal Rasch models.

Authors:  A Jackson Stenner; William P Fisher; Mark H Stone; Donald S Burdick
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-23

10.  Theory-based metrological traceability in education: A reading measurement network.

Authors:  William P Fisher; A Jackson Stenner
Journal:  Measurement (Lond)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.927

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.