Literature DB >> 24531893

Accuracy of a disposable compared to a non-disposable infant T-piece resuscitator.

Vera B Krabbe1, Jeroen J van Vonderen, Charles C Roehr, Arjan B Te Pas.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Both disposable and non-disposable T-piece resuscitator (TPR) devices are used. Accuracy of the disposable and non-disposable infant TPR was compared. Peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) and positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEP) were measured during ventilation of a test lung. Measured PIP ±1 cmH2O and PEEP ±0.5 cmH2O of the desired pressures were considered acceptable. We tested the following: (A) Accuracy of setting pressures using built-in manometers of three disposable TPRs, (B) Minimal and maximal PIP and PEEP levels for the non-disposable and disposable TPR were measured using different gas flow rates, and (C) Accuracy of 25 caregivers setting pressures (PIP 25 cmH2O and PEEP 5 cmH2O). The results of the tests performed were as follows: (A) With pressures set: PIP 20, 25, 30, and 40 cmH2O and PEEP 5-8 cmH2O with 1 cmH2O stepwise increment, measured PIPs and PEEPs were in acceptable range. (B) At gas flow rates 5, 8, 10, and 15 L/min (disposable vs. non-disposable), min-max PIP were 4.0-43.2 vs. 2.9-77.1 cmH2O and min-max PEEP were 0.3-22.3 and 0.6-59.7 cmH2O. (C) Set PIP (cmH2O) by participants using disposable vs. non-disposable TPR was 25.8 (0.8) vs. 25.9 (1.3) (ns). PEEP was 5.4(0.5) vs. 4.7(0.5); p < 0.001.
CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the disposable TPR is comparable to that of the non-disposable TPR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24531893     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-014-2280-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of methods of bag and mask ventilation for neonatal resuscitation.

Authors:  N N Finer; W Rich; A Craft; C Henderson
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Equipment and operator training denote manual ventilation performance in neonatal resuscitation.

Authors:  Charles C Roehr; Marcus Kelm; Hans Proquitté; Gerd Schmalisch
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Positive pressure ventilation at neonatal resuscitation: review of equipment and international survey of practice.

Authors:  C P F O'Donnell; P G Davis; C J Morley
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.299

Review 4.  Comparison of the T-piece resuscitator with other neonatal manual ventilation devices: a qualitative review.

Authors:  Colin Patrick Hawkes; C Anthony Ryan; Eugene Michael Dempsey
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.262

5.  Low versus high gas flow rate for respiratory support of infants at birth: a manikin study.

Authors:  Arjan B te Pas; Kim Schilleman; Mirjam Klein; Ruben S Witlox; Colin J Morley; Frans J Walther
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 4.035

6.  Reliability of two common PEEP-generating devices used in neonatal resuscitation.

Authors:  M Kelm; H Proquitté; G Schmalisch; C C Roehr
Journal:  Klin Padiatr       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.349

7.  Changing gas flow during neonatal resuscitation: a manikin study.

Authors:  Kim Schilleman; Georg M Schmölzer; Omar C O F Kamlin; Colin J Morley; Arjan B te Pas; Peter G Davis
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 5.262

8.  A comparison of three neonatal resuscitation devices.

Authors:  Stacie Bennett; Neil N Finer; Wade Rich; Yvonne Vaucher
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  Comparison of three manual ventilation devices using an intubated mannequin.

Authors:  S G Hussey; C A Ryan; B P Murphy
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.747

10.  Do we deliver the pressures we intend to when using a T-piece resuscitator?

Authors:  Evelien Roegholt; Jeroen J van Vonderen; Frans J Walther; Charles C Roehr; Arjan B te Pas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.