Literature DB >> 24531497

Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval.

Nash Unsworth1, Keisuke Fukuda2, Edward Awh3, Edward K Vogel3.   

Abstract

Several theories have been put forth to explain the relation between working memory (WM) and gF. Unfortunately, no single factor has been shown to fully account for the relation between these two important constructs. In the current study we tested whether multiple factors (capacity, attention control, and secondary memory) would collectively account for the relation. A large number of participants performed multiple measures of each construct and latent variable analyses were used to examine the data. The results demonstrated that capacity, attention control, and secondary memory were uniquely related to WM storage, WM processing, and gF. Importantly, the three factors completely accounted for the relation between WM (both processing and storage) and gF. Thus, although storage and processing make independent contributions to gF, both of these contributions are accounted for by variation in capacity, attention control and secondary memory. These results are consistent with the multifaceted view of WM, suggesting that individual differences in capacity, attention control, and secondary memory jointly account for individual differences in WM and its relation with gF.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluid intelligence; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24531497      PMCID: PMC4484859          DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  60 in total

1.  No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Thomas S Redick; Zach Shipstead; Tyler L Harrison; Kenny L Hicks; David E Fried; David Z Hambrick; Michael J Kane; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-06-18

Review 2.  Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky; Simon Farrell; Christopher Jarrold; Martin Greaves
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

3.  Why does working memory span predict complex cognition? Testing the strategy affordance hypothesis.

Authors:  Heather Bailey; John Dunlosky; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-12

4.  Interference within the focus of attention: working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance.

Authors:  Zach Shipstead; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Neural limits to representing objects still within view.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tsubomi; Keisuke Fukuda; Katsumi Watanabe; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  On the division of working memory and long-term memory and their relation to intelligence: A latent variable approach.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2009-12-21

7.  Working memory capacity and retrieval limitations from long-term memory: an examination of differences in accessibility.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Gregory J Spillers; Gene A Brewer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Neural measures reveal a fixed item limit in subitizing.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Trafton Drew; Daniel Klee; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Working memory capacity and retrieval from long-term memory: the role of controlled search.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Gene A Brewer; Gregory J Spillers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-02

10.  A common discrete resource for visual working memory and visual search.

Authors:  David E Anderson; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-09
View more
  111 in total

1.  Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: A microanalytic-macroanalytic investigation of individual differences in goal activation and maintenance.

Authors:  Matt E Meier; Bridget A Smeekens; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Contralateral Delay Activity Tracks Fluctuations in Working Memory Performance.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Matthew K Robison; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  John M Gaspar; Gregory J Christie; David J Prime; Pierre Jolicœur; John J McDonald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Clear evidence for item limits in visual working memory.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Individual differences in the allocation of attention to items in working memory: Evidence from pupillometry.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

6.  The scope and control of attention: Sources of variance in working memory capacity.

Authors:  Michael Chow; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

7.  Therapeutic Opportunities for Self-Control Repair in Addiction and Related Disorders: Change and the Limits of Change in Trans-Disease Processes.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; Amanda J Quisenberry; Lara Moody; A George Wilson
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-01-01

8.  Thalamus is a common locus of reading, arithmetic, and IQ: Analysis of local intrinsic functional properties.

Authors:  Maki S Koyama; Peter J Molfese; Michael P Milham; W Einar Mencl; Kenneth R Pugh
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Dynamic range of frontoparietal functional modulation is associated with working memory capacity limitations in older adults.

Authors:  Jonathan G Hakun; Nathan F Johnson
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 10.  Retest effects in working memory capacity tests: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jana Scharfen; Katrin Jansen; Heinz Holling
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.