Hugh C Rayner1, Lindsay Zepel2, Douglas S Fuller2, Hal Morgenstern3, Angelo Karaboyas2, Bruce F Culleton4, Donna L Mapes2, Antonio A Lopes5, Brenda W Gillespie6, Takeshi Hasegawa7, Rajiv Saran6, Francesca Tentori8, Manfred Hecking9, Ronald L Pisoni2, Bruce M Robinson10. 1. Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: hughrayner@gmail.com. 2. Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI. 3. Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 4. Baxter Healthcare Corporation, McGaw Park, IL. 5. Universidade Federal da Bahia, Faculdade de Medicina da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil. 6. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 7. Fujigaoka Hospital, Fujigaoka, Japan. 8. Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 9. Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 10. Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is limited information about the clinical and prognostic significance of patient-reported recovery time. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 6,040 patients in the DOPPS (Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study). PREDICTOR: Answer to question "How long does it take you to recover from a dialysis session?" categorized as follows: fewer than 2, 2-6, 7-12, or longer than 12 hours. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between recovery time and patient characteristics, hemodialysis treatment variables, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and hospitalization and mortality. RESULTS: 32% reported recovery time shorter than 2 hours; 41%, 2-6 hours; 17%, 7-12 hours; and 10%, longer than 12 hours. Using proportional odds (ordinal) logistic regression, shorter recovery time was associated with male sex, full-time employment, and higher serum albumin level. Longer recovery time was associated with older age, dialysis vintage, body mass index, diabetes, and psychiatric disorder. Greater intradialytic weight loss, longer dialysis session length, and lower dialysate sodium concentration were associated with longer recovery time. In facilities that used uniform dialysate sodium concentrations for ≥90% of patients, the adjusted OR of longer recovery time, comparing dialysate sodium concentration<140 vs 140 mEq/L, was 1.72 (95% CI, 1.37-2.16). Recovery time was correlated positively with symptoms of kidney failure and kidney disease burden score and inversely with HRQoL mental and physical component summary scores. Using Cox regression, adjusting for potential confounders not influenced by recovery time, it was associated positively with first hospitalization and mortality (adjusted HRs for recovery time>12 vs 2-6 hours 1.22 [95% CI, 1.09-1.37] and 1.47 [95% CI, 1.19-1.83], respectively). LIMITATIONS: Answers are subjective and not supported by physiologic measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery time can be used to identify patients with poorer HRQoL and higher risks of hospitalization and mortality. Interventions to reduce recovery time and possibly improve clinical outcomes, such as increasing dialysate sodium concentration, need to be tested in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: There is limited information about the clinical and prognostic significance of patient-reported recovery time. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 6,040 patients in the DOPPS (Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study). PREDICTOR: Answer to question "How long does it take you to recover from a dialysis session?" categorized as follows: fewer than 2, 2-6, 7-12, or longer than 12 hours. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between recovery time and patient characteristics, hemodialysis treatment variables, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and hospitalization and mortality. RESULTS: 32% reported recovery time shorter than 2 hours; 41%, 2-6 hours; 17%, 7-12 hours; and 10%, longer than 12 hours. Using proportional odds (ordinal) logistic regression, shorter recovery time was associated with male sex, full-time employment, and higher serum albumin level. Longer recovery time was associated with older age, dialysis vintage, body mass index, diabetes, and psychiatric disorder. Greater intradialytic weight loss, longer dialysis session length, and lower dialysate sodium concentration were associated with longer recovery time. In facilities that used uniform dialysate sodium concentrations for ≥90% of patients, the adjusted OR of longer recovery time, comparing dialysate sodium concentration<140 vs 140 mEq/L, was 1.72 (95% CI, 1.37-2.16). Recovery time was correlated positively with symptoms of kidney failure and kidney disease burden score and inversely with HRQoL mental and physical component summary scores. Using Cox regression, adjusting for potential confounders not influenced by recovery time, it was associated positively with first hospitalization and mortality (adjusted HRs for recovery time>12 vs 2-6 hours 1.22 [95% CI, 1.09-1.37] and 1.47 [95% CI, 1.19-1.83], respectively). LIMITATIONS: Answers are subjective and not supported by physiologic measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery time can be used to identify patients with poorer HRQoL and higher risks of hospitalization and mortality. Interventions to reduce recovery time and possibly improve clinical outcomes, such as increasing dialysate sodium concentration, need to be tested in randomized trials.
Authors: Manfred Hecking; Angelo Karaboyas; Rajiv Saran; Ananda Sen; Masaaki Inaba; Hugh Rayner; Walter H Hörl; Ronald L Pisoni; Bruce M Robinson; Gere Sunder-Plassmann; Friedrich K Port Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Ronald L Pisoni; Björn Wikström; Stacey J Elder; Tadao Akizawa; Yashushi Asano; Marcia L Keen; Rajiv Saran; David C Mendelssohn; Eric W Young; Friedrich K Port Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2006-09-12 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Antonio Alberto Lopes; Justin M Albert; Eric W Young; Sudtida Satayathum; Ronald L Pisoni; Vittorio E Andreucci; Donna L Mapes; Nancy A Mason; Shunichi Fukuhara; Björn Wikström; Akira Saito; Friedrich K Port Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Ronald L Pisoni; Brenda W Gillespie; David M Dickinson; Kenneth Chen; Michael H Kutner; Robert A Wolfe Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Donna L Mapes; Antonio Alberto Lopes; Sudtida Satayathum; Keith P McCullough; David A Goodkin; Francesco Locatelli; Shunichi Fukuhara; Eric W Young; Kiyoshi Kurokawa; Akira Saito; Jürgen Bommer; Robert A Wolfe; Philip J Held; Friedrich K Port Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Antonio Alberto Lopes; Jennifer Bragg; Eric Young; David Goodkin; Donna Mapes; Christian Combe; Luis Piera; Philip Held; Brenda Gillespie; Friedrich K Port Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Robert M Lindsay; Paul A Heidenheim; Gihad Nesrallah; Amit X Garg; Rita Suri Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2006-07-06 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Shunichi Fukuhara; Antonio Alberto Lopes; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; Kiyoshi Kurokawa; Donna L Mapes; Tadao Akizawa; Jürgen Bommer; Bernard J Canaud; Friedrich K Port; Philip J Held Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Tari D Topolski; James LoGerfo; Donald L Patrick; Barbara Williams; Julie Walwick; Marsha B Patrick Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Jeffrey Perl; Laura M Dember; Joanne M Bargman; Teri Browne; David M Charytan; Jennifer E Flythe; LaTonya J Hickson; Adriana M Hung; Michel Jadoul; Timmy Chang Lee; Klemens B Meyer; Hamid Moradi; Tariq Shafi; Isaac Teitelbaum; Leslie P Wong; Christopher T Chan Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Amit X Garg; Rita S Suri; Paul Eggers; Fredric O Finkelstein; Tom Greene; Paul L Kimmel; Alan S Kliger; Brett Larive; Robert M Lindsay; Andreas Pierratos; Mark Unruh; Glenn M Chertow Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Charles Chazot; Ken Farrington; Ionut Nistor; Wim Van Biesen; Hanneke Joosten; Daniel Teta; Dimitrie Siriopol; Adrian Covic Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 2.370