BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recommendations to decrease the dialysate sodium (DNa) prescription demand analyses of patient outcomes. We analyzed morbidity and mortality at various levels of DNa, simultaneously accounting for interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) and for the mortality risk associated with lower predialysis serum sodium (SNa) levels. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We used multiply-adjusted linear mixed models to evaluate the magnitude of IDWG and Cox proportional hazards models to assess hospitalizations and deaths in 29,593 patients from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study with baseline DNa and SNa as predictors, categorized according to lowest to highest levels. RESULTS: IDWG increased with higher DNa across all SNa categories, by 0.17% of body weight per 2 mEq/L higher DNa; however, higher DNa was not associated with higher mortality in a fully adjusted model (also adjusted for SNa; hazard ratio [HR]=0.98 per 2 mEq/L higher DNa, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-1.02). Instead, higher DNa was associated with lower hospitalization risk (HR=0.97 per 2 mEq/L higher DNa, 95% CI 0.95-1.00, P=0.04). Additional adjustments for IDWG did not change these results. In sensitivity analyses restricted to study facilities, in which 90%-100% of patients have the same DNa (56%), the adjusted HR for mortality was 0.88 per 2 mEq/L higher DNa (95% CI 0.83-0.94). These analyses represented a pseudo-randomized experiment in which the association between DNa and mortality is unlikely to have been confounded by indication. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of randomized prospective studies, the benefit of reducing IDWG by decreasing DNa prescriptions should be carefully weighed against an increased risk for adverse outcomes.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recommendations to decrease the dialysate sodium (DNa) prescription demand analyses of patient outcomes. We analyzed morbidity and mortality at various levels of DNa, simultaneously accounting for interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) and for the mortality risk associated with lower predialysis serum sodium (SNa) levels. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We used multiply-adjusted linear mixed models to evaluate the magnitude of IDWG and Cox proportional hazards models to assess hospitalizations and deaths in 29,593 patients from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study with baseline DNa and SNa as predictors, categorized according to lowest to highest levels. RESULTS: IDWG increased with higher DNa across all SNa categories, by 0.17% of body weight per 2 mEq/L higher DNa; however, higher DNa was not associated with higher mortality in a fully adjusted model (also adjusted for SNa; hazard ratio [HR]=0.98 per 2 mEq/L higher DNa, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-1.02). Instead, higher DNa was associated with lower hospitalization risk (HR=0.97 per 2 mEq/L higher DNa, 95% CI 0.95-1.00, P=0.04). Additional adjustments for IDWG did not change these results. In sensitivity analyses restricted to study facilities, in which 90%-100% of patients have the same DNa (56%), the adjusted HR for mortality was 0.88 per 2 mEq/L higher DNa (95% CI 0.83-0.94). These analyses represented a pseudo-randomized experiment in which the association between DNa and mortality is unlikely to have been confounded by indication. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of randomized prospective studies, the benefit of reducing IDWG by decreasing DNa prescriptions should be carefully weighed against an increased risk for adverse outcomes.
Authors: Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Deborah L Regidor; Csaba P Kovesdy; David Van Wyck; Suphamai Bunnapradist; Tamara B Horwich; Gregg C Fonarow Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-01-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ronald L Pisoni; Brenda W Gillespie; David M Dickinson; Kenneth Chen; Michael H Kutner; Robert A Wolfe Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: E Sbardella; A M Isidori; G Arnaldi; M Arosio; C Barone; A Benso; R Berardi; G Capasso; M Caprio; F Ceccato; G Corona; S Della Casa; L De Nicola; M Faustini-Fustini; E Fiaccadori; L Gesualdo; S Gori; A Lania; G Mantovani; P Menè; G Parenti; C Pinto; R Pivonello; P Razzore; G Regolisti; C Scaroni; F Trepiccione; A Lenzi; A Peri Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Hugh C Rayner; Lindsay Zepel; Douglas S Fuller; Hal Morgenstern; Angelo Karaboyas; Bruce F Culleton; Donna L Mapes; Antonio A Lopes; Brenda W Gillespie; Takeshi Hasegawa; Rajiv Saran; Francesca Tentori; Manfred Hecking; Ronald L Pisoni; Bruce M Robinson Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Geoffrey A Block; David P Rosenbaum; Maria Leonsson-Zachrisson; Bergur V Stefansson; Tina Rydén-Bergsten; Peter J Greasley; Susanne A Johansson; Mikael Knutsson; Björn C Carlsson Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 8.237