Rajiv Agarwal1. 1. Indiana University School of Medicine and Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Among hemodialysis patients, probing dry weight is an effective strategy for improving control of hypertension. Whether controlling hypertension improves or worsens symptoms among such patients remains unclear. The purpose of the study was to develop a tool to evaluate symptoms and examine the relationship of the change in these symptoms with blood pressure (BP) control. METHODS: Among patients participating in the Hemodialysis Patients Treated withAtenolol or Lisinopril (HDPAL) randomized controlled trial, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to establish the relationship between symptoms and organ systems. Next, the change in symptom scores pertaining to organ systems was analyzed using a mixed model. Finally, the independent effect of lowering home BP on change in symptoms was evaluated. RESULTS: Among 133 participants where symptoms were available at baseline, CFA revealed four level 1 domains: gastrointestinal symptoms, dialysis-related symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms and general symptoms. All except dialysis-related symptoms were ascribed to uremia (level 2 domain). Uremic symptoms improved over 6 months and then increased. Dialysis-related symptoms (fatigue, cramps and orthostatic dizziness) did not worsen despite lowering home BP. Probing dry weight was independently associated with an improvement in cardiovascular symptoms such as shortness of breath. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing BP through the use of a strategy that includes volume control and medication improves symptoms seemingly unrelated to volume excess. In long-term hemodialysis patients, treating hypertension using home BP measurements may improve well-being. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA 2015. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Among hemodialysis patients, probing dry weight is an effective strategy for improving control of hypertension. Whether controlling hypertension improves or worsens symptoms among such patients remains unclear. The purpose of the study was to develop a tool to evaluate symptoms and examine the relationship of the change in these symptoms with blood pressure (BP) control. METHODS: Among patients participating in the Hemodialysis Patients Treated with Atenolol or Lisinopril (HDPAL) randomized controlled trial, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to establish the relationship between symptoms and organ systems. Next, the change in symptom scores pertaining to organ systems was analyzed using a mixed model. Finally, the independent effect of lowering home BP on change in symptoms was evaluated. RESULTS: Among 133 participants where symptoms were available at baseline, CFA revealed four level 1 domains: gastrointestinal symptoms, dialysis-related symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms and general symptoms. All except dialysis-related symptoms were ascribed to uremia (level 2 domain). Uremic symptoms improved over 6 months and then increased. Dialysis-related symptoms (fatigue, cramps and orthostatic dizziness) did not worsen despite lowering home BP. Probing dry weight was independently associated with an improvement in cardiovascular symptoms such as shortness of breath. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing BP through the use of a strategy that includes volume control and medication improves symptoms seemingly unrelated to volume excess. In long-term hemodialysis patients, treating hypertension using home BP measurements may improve well-being. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA 2015. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
Authors: Zhensheng Li; Eduardo Lacson; Edmund G Lowrie; Norma J Ofsthun; Martin K Kuhlmann; J Michael Lazarus; Nathan W Levin Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Rajiv Agarwal; Arjun D Sinha; Maria K Pappas; Terri N Abraham; Getachew G Tegegne Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2014-01-06 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Manisha Jhamb; Francis Pike; Sarah Ramer; Christos Argyropoulos; Jennifer Steel; Mary Amanda Dew; Steven D Weisbord; Lisa Weissfeld; Mark Unruh Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2011-05-09 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Manisha Jhamb; Christos Argyropoulos; Jennifer L Steel; Laura Plantinga; Albert W Wu; Nancy E Fink; Neil R Powe; Klemens B Meyer; Mark L Unruh Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Hiddo J Lambers Heerspink; Toshiharu Ninomiya; Sophia Zoungas; Dick de Zeeuw; Diederick E Grobbee; Meg J Jardine; Martin Gallagher; Matthew A Roberts; Alan Cass; Bruce Neal; Vlado Perkovic Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-02-25 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Christina Sommerauer; Neha Kaushik; Adrine Woodham; Anna Renom-Guiteras; Yolanda V Martinez; David Reeves; Ilkka Kunnamo; Thekraiat Al Qur An; Steffen Hübner; Andreas Sönnichsen Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Jennifer E Flythe; Tara I Chang; Martin P Gallagher; Elizabeth Lindley; Magdalena Madero; Pantelis A Sarafidis; Mark L Unruh; Angela Yee-Moon Wang; Daniel E Weiner; Michael Cheung; Michel Jadoul; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Kevan R Polkinghorne Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2020-03-08 Impact factor: 10.612