Ryan J Marker1, Jennifer L Stephenson2, Benzi M Kluger3, Douglas Curran-Everett4, Katrina S Maluf5. 1. Rehabilitation Science Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. 2. Clinical Science Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. 4. Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. 5. Rehabilitation Science Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Physical Therapy Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. Electronic address: Katrina.Maluf@ucdenver.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Psychosocial stress has been associated with a variety of chronic pain disorders although the mechanisms responsible for this relationship are unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the excitability of intracortical and corticospinal pathways to the trapezius muscle in individuals with and without chronic neck pain during exposure to low and high levels of psychosocial stress. METHODS: Single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) during mental math performed in the presence and absence of social evaluative threat. RESULTS: All participants demonstrated higher amplitude MEPs in the high stress compared to the low stress condition (p < 0.01). Participants with chronic neck pain had significantly greater SICI than healthy participants in the low stress condition (p = 0.03). During exposure to the stressor, healthy participants showed an increase in SICI, whereas participants with neck pain showed no change (group difference for change in SICI, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that individuals with chronic neck pain inhibit motor output to the trapezius in the presence of minor stressors, and are unable to compensate for additional stress-evoked increases in corticospinal excitability through further modulation of SICI. This observation has potential implications for the management of patients who have difficulty relaxing painful muscles during times of stress.
OBJECTIVE: Psychosocial stress has been associated with a variety of chronic pain disorders although the mechanisms responsible for this relationship are unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the excitability of intracortical and corticospinal pathways to the trapezius muscle in individuals with and without chronic neck pain during exposure to low and high levels of psychosocial stress. METHODS: Single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) during mental math performed in the presence and absence of social evaluative threat. RESULTS: All participants demonstrated higher amplitude MEPs in the high stress compared to the low stress condition (p < 0.01). Participants with chronic neck pain had significantly greater SICI than healthy participants in the low stress condition (p = 0.03). During exposure to the stressor, healthy participants showed an increase in SICI, whereas participants with neck pain showed no change (group difference for change in SICI, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that individuals with chronic neck pain inhibit motor output to the trapezius in the presence of minor stressors, and are unable to compensate for additional stress-evoked increases in corticospinal excitability through further modulation of SICI. This observation has potential implications for the management of patients who have difficulty relaxing painful muscles during times of stress.
Authors: Peter Schwenkreis; Andrea Scherens; Anne-Kathrin Rönnau; Oliver Höffken; Martin Tegenthoff; Christoph Maier Journal: BMC Neurosci Date: 2010-06-11 Impact factor: 3.288
Authors: Craig D Tokuno; Martin Keller; Mark G Carpenter; Gonzalo Márquez; Wolfgang Taube Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Paulo E P Teixeira; Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Muhammed Enes Gunduz; Anna Carolyna Gianlorenço; Luis Castelo-Branco; Felipe Fregni Journal: Neurophysiol Clin Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Klara Saczuk; Barbara Lapinska; Paulina Wilmont; Lukasz Pawlak; Monika Lukomska-Szymanska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 3.390