Literature DB >> 11812209

Signal processing in magnetoencephalography.

J Vrba1, S E Robinson.   

Abstract

The subject of this article is detection of brain magnetic fields, or magnetoencephalography (MEG). The brain fields are many orders of magnitude smaller than the environmental magnetic noise and their measurement represent a significant metrological challenge. The only detectors capable of resolving such small fields and at the same time handling the large dynamic range of the environmental noise are superconducting quantum interference devices (or SQUIDs). The SQUIDs are coupled to the brain magnetic fields using combinations of superconducting coils called flux transformers (primary sensors). The environmental noise is attenuated by a combination of shielding, primary sensor geometry, and synthetic methods. One of the most successful synthetic methods for noise elimination is synthetic higher-order gradiometers. How the gradiometers can be synthesized is shown and examples of their noise cancellation effectiveness are given. The MEG signals measured on the scalp surface must be interpreted and converted into information about the distribution of currents within the brain. This task is complicated by the fact that such inversion is nonunique. Additional mathematical simplifications, constraints, or assumptions must be employed to obtain useful source images. Methods for the interpretation of the MEG signals include the popular point current dipole, minimum norm methods, spatial filtering, beamformers, MUSIC, and Bayesian techniques. The use of synthetic aperture magnetometry (a class of beamformers) is illustrated in examples of interictal epileptic spiking and voluntary hand-motor activity. Copyright 2001 Elsevier Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11812209     DOI: 10.1006/meth.2001.1238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  222 in total

Review 1.  Brain imaging and functional gastrointestinal disorders: has it helped our understanding?

Authors:  A R Hobson; Q Aziz
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Cortical oscillatory changes in human middle temporal cortex underlying smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Benjamin T Dunkley; Tom C A Freeman; Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy; Krish D Singh
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Seeing touch and pain in a stranger modulates the cortical responses elicited by somatosensory but not auditory stimulation.

Authors:  Elia Valentini; Meng Liang; Salvatore Maria Aglioti; Gian Domenico Iannetti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  An MEG study of the spatiotemporal dynamics of bilingual verb generation.

Authors:  Elizabeth W Pang; Matt J MacDonald
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Recollection and familiarity make independent contributions to memory judgments.

Authors:  Lisa H Evans; Edward L Wilding
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Emotional automaticity is a matter of timing.

Authors:  Qian Luo; Tom Holroyd; Catherine Majestic; Xi Cheng; Julia Schechter; R James Blair
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Sensitivity of beamformer source analysis to deficiencies in forward modeling.

Authors:  Olaf Steinsträter; Stephanie Sillekens; Markus Junghoefer; Martin Burger; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  The use of contact heat evoked potential stimulator (CHEPS) in magnetoencephalography for pain research.

Authors:  Raghavan Gopalakrishnan; Andre G Machado; Richard C Burgess; John C Mosher
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Anxiety, a benefit and detriment to cognition: behavioral and magnetoencephalographic evidence from a mixed-saccade task.

Authors:  Brian R Cornwell; Sven C Mueller; Raphael Kaplan; Christian Grillon; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Vector projection of biomagnetic fields.

Authors:  L A Bradshaw; A Myers; W O Richards; W Drake; J P Wikswo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.