Literature DB >> 24519389

Determinants of genetic counseling uptake and its impact on breast cancer outcome: a population-based study.

Aurélie Ayme1, Valeria Viassolo, Elisabetta Rapiti, Gérald Fioretta, Hyma Schubert, Christine Bouchardy, Pierre O Chappuis, Simone Benhamou.   

Abstract

Genetic counseling and BRCA1/BRCA2 genes testing are routinely offered in a clinical setting. However, no data are available on the proportion of breast cancer patients with a positive family history undergoing genetic counseling. By linking databases of the Oncogenetics and Cancer Prevention Unit at the Geneva University Hospitals and the population-based Geneva Cancer Registry, we evaluated the uptake of genetic counseling among 1709 breast cancer patients with familial risk of breast cancer and the determinants of such a consultation process. We also studied the impact of genetic counseling on contralateral breast cancer occurrence and survival. Overall, 191 (11.2 %) breast cancer patients had genetic counseling; this proportion was 25.1 % within the high familial risk group. Recent period of diagnosis, early-onset breast cancer, female offspring, high familial risk, tumor size, and chemotherapy treatment were statistically significantly associated with genetic counseling uptake in multivariate analysis. More than 2 % of patients had developed contralateral metachronous breast cancer. An increased risk of contralateral breast cancer of borderline significance was found for patients who had genetic counseling versus those who had not (Cox model adjusted hazard ratio 2.2, 95 % confidence intervals 1.0-5.2, P = 0.063). Stratification by BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status showed that the occurrence of contralateral breast cancer was 8-fold higher among mutation carriers compared with non-carriers. Age-adjusted overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival were not significantly different between patients who underwent genetic counseling and those who did not. In conclusion, we observed a significant increase in the use of genetic counseling over time and found that breast cancer patients with high familial risk had more often genetic counseling than those with moderate familial risk. A more thorough evaluation of sociodemographic and clinical predictors to attend the cancer genetic unit may help improving the use of genetic counseling services for at-risk individuals at a population level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24519389     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-2864-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  8 in total

1.  Low Referral Rate for Genetic Testing in Racially and Ethnically Diverse Patients Despite Universal Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Charles Muller; Sang Mee Lee; William Barge; Shazia M Siddique; Shivali Berera; Gina Wideroff; Rashmi Tondon; Jeremy Chang; Meaghan Peterson; Jessica Stoll; Bryson W Katona; Daniel A Sussman; Joshua Melson; Sonia S Kupfer
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  Why Is Cancer Genetic Counseling Underutilized by Women Identified as at Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer? Patient Perceptions of Barriers Following a Referral Letter.

Authors:  Alyssa Kne; Heather Zierhut; Shari Baldinger; Karen K Swenson; Pamela Mink; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Michaela L Tsai
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Mental Illness and BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing Intention Among Multiethnic Women Undergoing Screening Mammography.

Authors:  Tarsha Jones; Katherine Freeman; Marra Ackerman; Meghna S Trivedi; Thomas Silverman; Peter Shapiro; Rita Kukafka; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Facilitators and Challenges in Psychosocial Adaptation to Being at Increased Familial Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Louise Heiniger; Melanie A Price; Margaret Charles; Phyllis N Butow
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Cancer Predisposition Cascade Screening for Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndromes in Switzerland: Study Protocol.

Authors:  Maria C Katapodi; Valeria Viassolo; Maria Caiata-Zufferey; Christos Nikolaidis; Nicole Buerki; Karl Heinimann; Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz; Olivia Pagani; Pierre O Chappuis; Rosmarie Bührer-Landolt; Rossella Graffeo; Henrik Csaba Horváth; Christian Kurzeder; Manuela Rabaglio; Michael Scharfe; Corinne Urech; Tobias E Erlanger; Nicole Probst-Hensch
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-09-20

6.  Efficacy versus effectiveness of clinical genetic testing criteria for BRCA1 and BRCA2 hereditary mutations in incident breast cancer.

Authors:  Martin P Nilsson; Christof Winter; Ulf Kristoffersson; Martin Rehn; Christer Larsson; Lao H Saal; Niklas Loman
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Written pretest information and germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant testing in unselected breast cancer patients: predictors of testing uptake.

Authors:  Martin P Nilsson; Erik D Nilsson; Barbro Silfverberg; Åke Borg; Niklas Loman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Cancer registries can provide evidence-based data to improve quality of care and prevent cancer deaths.

Authors:  Christine Bouchardy; Elisabetta Rapiti; Simone Benhamou
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2014-03-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.