Literature DB >> 24519241

Weight change and change in tibial cartilage volume and symptoms in obese adults.

Andrew J Teichtahl1, Anita E Wluka1, Stephanie K Tanamas1, Yuanyuan Wang1, Boyd J Strauss2, Joseph Proietto3, John B Dixon4, Graeme Jones5, Andrew Forbes1, Flavia M Cicuttini1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of data examining the effects of weight change on knee joint structures and symptoms. This study examined the effect of weight change on change in knee cartilage volume and symptoms in an obese cohort.
METHODS: 112 obese subjects (Body Mass Index ≥30 kg/m(2)) were recruited from various community sources to examine the effect of obesity on musculoskeletal health. Tibial cartilage volume, determined by MRI, and knee symptoms, determined by the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were collected at baseline and an average of 2.3 years later.
RESULTS: Percentage weight change was associated with change in medial tibial cartilage volume (β -1.2 mm(3), 95% CI -2.3 to -0.1 mm(3), p=0.03) that was consistent throughout the spectrum of weight loss through to mild weight gain. Percentage weight change was not associated with change in the lateral tibial (p=0.93) or patella (p=0.32) cartilage volumes. Percentage weight change was associated with change in all WOMAC subscales (all p≤0.01): pain (β -1.8 mm, 95% CI -3.2 to -0.4 mm), stiffness (β -1.6 mm, 95% CI -2.5 to -0.7 mm) and function (β -6.9 mm, 95% CI -11.6 to -2.1 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: The linearity of effect implies that weight loss is associated with reduced medial cartilage volume loss and improved knee symptoms, while weight gain is associated with increased medial cartilage volume loss and worse knee symptoms. These results suggest that in obese people, small amounts of weight change may have the potential for a disease modifying effect on both knee joint structure and symptoms. While weight loss is an important primary management strategy in obese individuals, avoidance of further weight gain should also be a clinical goal. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24519241     DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  17 in total

1.  Tool for osteoarthritis risk prediction (TOARP) over 8 years using baseline clinical data, X-ray, and MRI: Data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Gabby B Joseph; Charles E McCulloch; Michael C Nevitt; Jan Neumann; Alexandra S Gersing; Martin Kretzschmar; Benedikt J Schwaiger; John A Lynch; Ursula Heilmeier; Nancy E Lane; Thomas M Link
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Successes, challenges and developments in Australian rheumatology.

Authors:  Eric F Morand; Michelle T Leech
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  The role of thermal balneotherapy in the treatment of obese patient with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Stefano Masiero; Filippo Vittadini; Costanza Ferroni; Anna Bosco; Roberto Serra; Anna Chiara Frigo; Antonio Frizziero
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 4.  State-of-the-Art management of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Kenton H Fibel; Howard J Hillstrom; Brian C Halpern
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Musculoskeletal Pain, Physical Function, and Quality of Life After Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Sharon Bout-Tabaku; Resmi Gupta; Todd M Jenkins; Justin R Ryder; Amy E Baughcum; Rebecca D Jackson; Thomas H Inge; John B Dixon; Michael A Helmrath; Anita P Courcoulas; James E Mitchell; Carroll M Harmon; Changchun Xie; Marc P Michalsky
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Body mass index changes after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty do not adversely influence patient outcomes.

Authors:  Zhan Xia; Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Graham Seow-Hng Goh; Hwei Chi Chong; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Is Weight Loss Associated with Less Progression of Changes in Knee Articular Cartilage among Obese and Overweight Patients as Assessed with MR Imaging over 48 Months? Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Alexandra S Gersing; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Michael C Nevitt; Gabby B Joseph; Nattagan Chanchek; Julio B Guimaraes; John Mbapte Wamba; Luca Facchetti; Charles E McCulloch; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  State of the evidence.

Authors:  Kelli D Allen; Yvonne M Golightly
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Conservatively treated knee injury is associated with knee cartilage matrix degeneration measured with MRI-based T2 relaxation times: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Felix C Hofmann; Jan Neumann; Ursula Heilmeier; Gabby B Joseph; Michael C Nevitt; Charles E McCulloch; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Progression of cartilage degeneration and clinical symptoms in obese and overweight individuals is dependent on the amount of weight loss: 48-month data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  A S Gersing; M Solka; G B Joseph; B J Schwaiger; U Heilmeier; G Feuerriegel; M C Nevitt; C E McCulloch; T M Link
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 6.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.