Literature DB >> 2451815

The analgesic efficacy of flupirtine in comparison to pentazocine and placebo assessed by EEG and subjective pain ratings.

B Bromm1, R Ganzel, W M Herrmann, W Meier, E Scharein.   

Abstract

In a placebo-controlled double-blind study the analgesic efficacy of the non-narcotic analgesic flupirtine (80 mg i.v.) was evaluated in comparison with the opioid pentazocine (30 mg i.v.). The variables investigated were the subjects' pain ratings (E), the somatosensory evoked cerebral potentials (SEP), the auditory evoked potentials (AEP) and the power spectral density of the ongoing EEG (PSD). One stimulus block before (PRE) and one stimulus block after (POST) medication were applied. In one stimulus block 80 intracutaneous electrical stimuli of two- and three-fold pain threshold amperage were given in randomized order of intensity and inter-stimulus intervals. Both treatments reduced the subjects' pain ratings significantly, while the placebo values were constant. These effects on pain ratings were in parallel with the SEP changes. The peak-to-peak amplitudes of the late components were significantly diminished by both drugs. Placebo had no effect on this variable. The AEPs remained considerably constant after all three treatments indicating specific drug effect on the pain-related somatosensory pathways. Flupirtine showed effects similar to those of pentazocine in terms of pain relief. The changes in ongoing EEG activity, however, were of a different kind. Pentazocine changed the EEG in an opiate-like manner, while flupirtine increased relative power in the theta and beta range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2451815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  7 in total

1.  [Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): Antirheumatic, anti-pyretic or analgesic drugs?].

Authors:  K Brune
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Tonic versus phasic pain: dose-related effects of ketoprofen.

Authors:  T Hummel; H Huber; S Menzel; G Kobal
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Mode of antinociceptive action of flupirtine in the rat.

Authors:  I Szelenyi; B Nickel; H O Borbe; K Brune
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 4.  Flupirtine. A review of its pharmacological properties, and therapeutic efficacy in pain states.

Authors:  H A Friedel; A Fitton
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Dose-related analgesic effects of flupirtine.

Authors:  T Hummel; T Friedmann; E Pauli; G Niebch; H O Borbe; G Kobal
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Electroencephalography and analgesics.

Authors:  Lasse Paludan Malver; Anne Brokjaer; Camilla Staahl; Carina Graversen; Trine Andresen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Effects of pentazocine and acetylsalicylic acid on pain-rating, pain-related evoked potentials and vigilance in relationship to pharmacokinetic parameters.

Authors:  G Kobal; C Hummel; B Nuernberg; K Brune
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1990-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.