Literature DB >> 23593934

Electroencephalography and analgesics.

Lasse Paludan Malver1, Anne Brokjaer, Camilla Staahl, Carina Graversen, Trine Andresen, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes.   

Abstract

To assess centrally mediated analgesic mechanisms in clinical trials with pain patients, objective standardized methods such as electroencephalography (EEG) has many advantages. The aim of this review is to provide the reader with an overview of present findings in analgesics assessed with spontaneous EEG and evoked brain potentials (EPs) in humans. Furthermore, EEG methodologies will be discussed with respect to translation from animals to humans and future perspectives in predicting analgesic efficacy. We searched PubMed with MeSH terms 'analgesics', 'electroencephalography' and 'evoked potentials' for relevant articles. Combined with a search in their reference lists 15 articles on spontaneous EEG and 55 papers on EPs were identified. Overall, opioids produced increased activity in the delta band in the spontaneous EEG, but increases in higher frequency bands were also seen. The EP amplitudes decreased in the majority of studies. Anticonvulsants used as analgesics showed inconsistent results. The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist ketamine showed an increase in the theta band in spontaneous EEG and decreases in EP amplitudes. Tricyclic antidepressants increased the activity in the delta, theta and beta bands in the spontaneous EEG while EPs were inconsistently affected. Weak analgesics were mainly investigated with EPs and a decrease in amplitudes was generally observed. This review reveals that both spontaneous EEG and EPs are widely used as biomarkers for analgesic drug effects. Methodological differences are common and a more uniform approach will further enhance the value of such biomarkers for drug development and prediction of treatment response in individual patients.
© 2013 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  analgesics; electroencephalography; evoked potentials; pain; pharmacologic actions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23593934      PMCID: PMC3895349          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  144 in total

1.  Can the flow of medicines be improved? Fundamental pharmacokinetic and pharmacological principles toward improving Phase II survival.

Authors:  Paul Morgan; Piet H Van Der Graaf; John Arrowsmith; Doug E Feltner; Kira S Drummond; Craig D Wegner; Steve D A Street
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 2.  Aligning strategies for using EEG as a surrogate biomarker: a review of preclinical and clinical research.

Authors:  Steven C Leiser; John Dunlop; Mark R Bowlby; David M Devilbiss
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 5.858

3.  Rationale and methods for assessment of pain-depressed behavior in preclinical assays of pain and analgesia.

Authors:  S Stevens Negus; Edward J Bilsky; Gail Pereira Do Carmo; Glenn W Stevenson
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

4.  Effects of sufentanil on median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  M A Kimovec; A Koht; T B Sloan
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 5.  Sufentanil. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  J P Monk; R Beresford; A Ward
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Visualizing the complex brain dynamics of chronic pain.

Authors:  Carl Saab
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Analgesic effects of dihydrocodeine and tramadol when administered either in the morning or evening.

Authors:  T Hummel; H G Kraetsch; J Lötsch; M Hepper; J Liefhold; G Kobal
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  No contribution of morphine-6-glucuronide to clinical morphine effects after short-term administration.

Authors:  J Lötsch; G Kobal; G Geisslinger
Journal:  Clin Neuropharmacol       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.592

9.  Identification of sensory blockade by somatosensory and pain-induced evoked potentials.

Authors:  Gunter N Schmidt; Eckehard Scharein; Markus Siegel; Jakob Müller; Stefan Debener; Rainer Nitzschke; Andreas Engel; Petra Bischoff
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 10.  Electroencephalogram-based pharmacodynamic measures: a review.

Authors:  Michael Bewernitz; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.366

View more
  17 in total

1.  Single-sweep spectral analysis of contact heat evoked potentials: a novel approach to identify altered cortical processing after morphine treatment.

Authors:  Tine M Hansen; Carina Graversen; Jens B Frøkjaer; Anne E Olesen; Massimiliano Valeriani; Asbjørn M Drewes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Usefulness of laser-evoked potentials and quantitative sensory testing in the diagnosis of neuropathic spinal cord injury pain: a multiple case study.

Authors:  G Landmann; M F Berger; L Stockinger; E Opsommer
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Venlafaxine and oxycodone have different effects on spinal and supraspinal activity in man: a somatosensory evoked potential study.

Authors:  Dina Lelic; Massimiliano Valeriani; Iben W D Fischer; Albert Dahan; Asbjørn M Drewes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Interacting Influences of Sleep, Pain, and Analgesic Medications on Sleep Studies in Rodents.

Authors:  Linda A Toth
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 0.982

5.  Pleiotropic Effects of Kappa Opioid Receptor-Related Ligands in Non-human Primates.

Authors:  Mei-Chuan Ko; Stephen M Husbands
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2020-12-04

6.  Electroencephalography and delirium in the postoperative period.

Authors:  B J A Palanca; T S Wildes; Y S Ju; S Ching; M S Avidan
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, multi-center trial in healthy subjects to investigate the effects of lacosamide, pregabalin, and tapentadol on biomarkers of pain processing observed by electroencephalography (EEG).

Authors:  Keith G Phillips; Rolf-Detlef Treede; André Mouraux; Petra Bloms-Funke; Irmgard Boesl; Ombretta Caspani; Sonya C Chapman; Giulia Di Stefano; Nanna Brix Finnerup; Luis Garcia-Larrea; Marcus Goetz; Anna Kostenko; Bernhard Pelz; Esther Pogatzki-Zahn; Karin Schubart; Alexandre Stouffs; Andrea Truini; Irene Tracey; Iñaki F Troconiz; Johannes Van Niel; Jose Miguel Vela; Katy Vincent; Jan Vollert; Vishvarani Wanigasekera; Matthias Wittayer
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Prediction of Hemodynamic Reactivity by Electroencephalographically Derived Pain Threshold Index in Children Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Lei Wu; Siyuan Wang; Yanting Wang; Kan Zhang; Jie Bai; Jijian Zheng
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Magnetoencephalography reveals increased slow-to-fast alpha power ratios in patients with chronic pain.

Authors:  Bart Witjes; Sylvain Baillet; Mathieu Roy; Robert Oostenveld; Frank J P M Huygen; Cecile C de Vos
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2021-06-03

10.  Sensory testing and topical capsaicin can characterize patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Bjoern Anders; Malte Anders; Matthias Kreuzer; Sebastian Zinn; Lukas Fricker; Christoph Maier; Miriam Wolters; Michaela Köhm; Frank Behrens; Carmen Walter
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 3.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.