BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The retention of plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles in subendothelial space following transcytosis across the endothelium is the initial step of atherosclerosis. Whether or not C-reactive protein (CRP) can directly affect the transcytosis of LDL is not clear. Here we have examined the effect of CRP on transcytosis of LDL across endothelial cells and have explored the underlying mechanisms. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Effects of CRP on transcytosis of FITC-labelled LDL were examined with human umbilical vein endothelial cells and venous rings in vitro and, in vivo, ApoE(-/-) mice. Laser scanning confocal microscopy, immunohistochemistry and Oil Red O staining were used to assay LDL. KEY RESULTS: CRP increased transcytosis of LDL. An NADPH oxidase inhibitor, diphenylene iodonium, and the reducing agent, dithiothreitol partly or completely blocked CRP-stimulated increase of LDL transcytosis. The PKC inhibitor, bisindolylmaleimide I and the Src kinase inhibitor, PP2, blocked the trafficking of the molecules responsible for transcytosis. Confocal imaging analysis revealed that CRP stimulated LDL uptake by endothelial cells and vessel walls. In ApoE(-/-) mice, CRP significantly promoted early changes of atherosclerosis, which were blocked by inhibitors of transcytosis. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: CRP promoted atherosclerosis by directly increasing the transcytosis of LDL across endothelial cells and increasing LDL retention in vascular walls. These actions of CRP were associated with generation of reactive oxygen species, activation of PKC and Src, and translocation of caveolar or soluble forms of the N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The retention of plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles in subendothelial space following transcytosis across the endothelium is the initial step of atherosclerosis. Whether or not C-reactive protein (CRP) can directly affect the transcytosis of LDL is not clear. Here we have examined the effect of CRP on transcytosis of LDL across endothelial cells and have explored the underlying mechanisms. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Effects of CRP on transcytosis of FITC-labelled LDL were examined with human umbilical vein endothelial cells and venous rings in vitro and, in vivo, ApoE(-/-) mice. Laser scanning confocal microscopy, immunohistochemistry and Oil Red O staining were used to assay LDL. KEY RESULTS:CRP increased transcytosis of LDL. An NADPH oxidase inhibitor, diphenylene iodonium, and the reducing agent, dithiothreitol partly or completely blocked CRP-stimulated increase of LDL transcytosis. The PKC inhibitor, bisindolylmaleimide I and the Src kinase inhibitor, PP2, blocked the trafficking of the molecules responsible for transcytosis. Confocal imaging analysis revealed that CRP stimulated LDL uptake by endothelial cells and vessel walls. In ApoE(-/-) mice, CRP significantly promoted early changes of atherosclerosis, which were blocked by inhibitors of transcytosis. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: CRP promoted atherosclerosis by directly increasing the transcytosis of LDL across endothelial cells and increasing LDL retention in vascular walls. These actions of CRP were associated with generation of reactive oxygen species, activation of PKC and Src, and translocation of caveolar or soluble forms of the N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein.
Authors: Mark B Pepys; Gideon M Hirschfield; Glenys A Tennent; J Ruth Gallimore; Melvyn C Kahan; Vittorio Bellotti; Philip N Hawkins; Rebecca M Myers; Martin D Smith; Alessandra Polara; Alexander J A Cobb; Steven V Ley; J Andrew Aquilina; Carol V Robinson; Isam Sharif; Gillian A Gray; Caroline A Sabin; Michelle C Jenvey; Simon E Kolstoe; Darren Thompson; Stephen P Wood Journal: Nature Date: 2006-04-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Seungkirl Ahn; Jihee Kim; Carmen L Lucaveche; Mary C Reedy; Louis M Luttrell; Robert J Lefkowitz; Yehia Daaka Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2002-05-13 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Philippe G Frank; Stephanos Pavlides; Michelle W-C Cheung; Kristin Daumer; Michael P Lisanti Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2008-05-28 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Stephen P H Alexander; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Michael Spedding; John A Peters; Anthony J Harmar Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Caitlin A Dow; Danielle L Templeton; Grace M Lincenberg; Jared J Greiner; Brian L Stauffer; Christopher A DeSouza Journal: Life Sci Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 5.037
Authors: Maria Daniela Garcia-Castillo; Daniel J-F Chinnapen; Wayne I Lencer Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 10.005
Authors: Guy Eelen; Pauline de Zeeuw; Lucas Treps; Ulrike Harjes; Brian W Wong; Peter Carmeliet Journal: Physiol Rev Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 37.312
Authors: Bomy Lee Chung; Michael J Toth; Nazila Kamaly; Yoshitaka J Sei; Jacob Becraft; Willem J M Mulder; Zahi A Fayad; Omid C Farokhzad; YongTae Kim; Robert Langer Journal: Nano Today Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 20.722
Authors: M Mazidi; A Heidari-Bakavoli; S S Khayyatzadeh; M R Azarpazhooh; M Nematy; M Safarian; H Esmaeili; S M R Parizadeh; M Ghayour-Mobarhan; A P Kengne; G A Ferns Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Susan M Armstrong; Michael G Sugiyama; Karen Y Y Fung; Yizhuo Gao; Changsen Wang; Andrew S Levy; Paymon Azizi; Mark Roufaiel; Su-Ning Zhu; Dante Neculai; Charles Yin; Steffen-Sebastian Bolz; Nabil G Seidah; Myron I Cybulsky; Bryan Heit; Warren L Lee Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 10.787