| Literature DB >> 24517259 |
Esther L H Tang, Jayakumar Rajarajeswaran, Shin Yee Fung, M S Kanthimathi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Coriandrum sativum is a popular culinary and medicinal herb of the Apiaceae family. Health promoting properties of this herb have been reported in pharmacognostical, phytochemical and pharmacological studies. However, studies on C. sativum have always focused on the aerial parts of the herb and scientific investigation on the root is limited. The aim of this research was to investigate the antioxidant and anticancer activities of C. sativum root, leaf and stem, including its effect on cancer cell migration, and its protection against DNA damage, with special focus on the roots.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24517259 PMCID: PMC4028854 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-347
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Phenolic content, ferric reducing antioxidant power and DPPH radical scavenging activity of extracts
| 31.38 ± 2.75 | 0.129 ± 0.007 | 2348.3 ± 184.1 | |
| 24.57 ± 0.70 (Ethyl acetate) | 0.136 ± 0.008 (Dichloromethane) | 1335.0 ± 37.7 (Aqueous) | |
| | | | |
| Rutin | 649.93 ± 13.34 | 1.789 ± 0.214 | 42.7 ± 2.3 |
| Quercetin | 1275.62 ± 56.03 | 14.444 ± 0.934 | 22.2 ± 0.9 |
Each value is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).
IC50 values are presented for the DPPH radical scavenging activity.
All values are significantly different at P < 0.05 compared to the negative control as tested by the Student’s t-test.
Correlation analyses of the total phenolic content and antioxidant activities of extracts
| 0.982* | 0.663* | |
| 0.300 | 0.906* | |
TPC, total phenolic content; FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant power; DPPH, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl radical scavenging activity.
* Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.
Summary of the anti-proliferative activities of extracts on MCF-7 and 184B5 cell lines
| 100.0 ± 1.7 | 200.0 ± 2.6 | 174.3 ± 26.0 | 317.0 ± 9.6 | |
| 138.0 ± 8.7 | 432.3 ± 41.0 | ND | ND | |
Each value is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).
ND = Not Detected.
Figure 1Antioxidant enzyme activities in untreated and treated MCF-7 cells with root extract. MCF-7 cells (1.5 × 106) were treated with C. sativum root ethyl acetate extract at 200 μg/ml (IC50 concentration) for 0, 6, 9, 15, 24 and 48 h. DMSO was used to replace the extract in untreated cells. (A) Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity is expressed in U/ml per 106 cells, while (B) glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and (C) catalase (CAT) activities are expressed in nmol/min/ml per 106 cells. Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Activities of caspase-3, -8 and -9 in MCF-7 cells treated with root extract
| Control | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 1.00 ± 0.00 |
| | | | |
| 200 μg/ml | 0.87 ± 0.02 | 0.83 ± 0.00 | 0.84 ± 0.03 |
| 276 μg/ml | 0.86 ± 0.03 | 0.87 ± 0.03 | 0.88 ± 0.04 |
| Positive control | 0.91 ± 0.01 | 0.87 ± 0.01 | 0.87 ± 0.02 |
| | | | |
| 200 μg/ml | 1.20 ± 0.02* | 1.16 ± 0.02* | 1.12 ± 0.03* |
| 276 μg/ml | 1.28 ± 0.02* | 1.21 ± 0.03* | 1.30 ± 0.01* |
| Positive control | 1.06 ± 0.01* | 1.06 ± 0.02* | 1.07 ± 0.02* |
The positive controls used were colchicine (caspase-3) and mitomycin C (caspase-8 and -9) at 1 μM.
Values are expressed as fold change compared to control, mean ± SD (n = 3).
*Values are significantly different at P < 0.05 compared to control as tested by the Student’s t-test.
Sub-G populations in untreated (control) and treated MCF-7 cells with root extract
| 24 | 0.73 ± 0.60 | 18.53 ± 1.25 * |
| 48 | 2.59 ± 2.16 | 35.67 ± 2.61 * |
| 72 | 0.78 ± 1.34 | 42.46 ± 2.06 * |
Each value is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).
*P < 0.01 compared to the control as tested by the Student’s t-test.
Figure 2root extract induces cell cycle arrest at G/M phase in MCF-7 cells. The cell cycle distribution was determined by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. MCF-7 cells were treated with the root ethyl acetate extract (276.0 μg/ml) for 24, 48 and 72 h. Untreated cells at each time point were included as controls. The DNA histogram shows the distribution and the percentage of cells in phases of the cell cycle. Results are the mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments. *P < 0.01 compared to the control as tested by the Student’s t-test. Each DNA histogram represents one of the three independent experiments.
Figure 3Inhibition of HO-induced MCF-7 cell migration by root ethyl acetate extract. Results are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). * P < 0.05 compared to the control (without extract) as tested by the Student’s t-test.
Protection from H O -induced DNA damage in 3 T3-L1 fibroblasts pre-treated with root extract
| 100 | 3.4 ± 4.7* |
| 200 | 6.5 ± 5.5* |
| 300 | 13.4 ± 6.1* |
| 400 | 21.5 ± 6.6* |
Means ± SD are presented (n = 3).
* P < 0.05 compared to control (without extract treatment), as tested by the Student’s t-test.
Figure 4HPLC chromatogram of root extract. Reverse phase separation was performed at 40°C using a Merck Purospher STAR RP-18 endcapped column (5 μm). The mobile phase consisted of trifluoroacetic acid in water at pH 2.6 (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). The gradient program consisted of: 0% to 12.5% B for 2.5 min, 12.5% to 100% B for 17.5 min and 100% B for 10 min. The flow rate was kept at 1 ml/min and injection volume was 10 μl. The eluted peaks were monitored at 254 nm. 1: ascorbic acid; 2: p-coumaric acid; 3: butylated hydroxytoluene; S1: unidentified peaks collected for GC-MS analysis. (BSTFA = N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide).