| Literature DB >> 24516454 |
Georgia Cristina Tavolaro Soares1, Daniela Sales Alviano2, Gabriela da Silva Santos1, Celuta Sales Alviano2, Ana Luiza Mattos-Guaraldi3, Prescilla Emy Nagao1.
Abstract
GBS serotypes III and V were the most prevalent in pregnant women and exhibited resistance to tetracycline, clindamycin and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. Serotype III showed high sialic acid content and PFGE analysis discerned 33 heterogeneous profiles. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization could be relevant to control GBS infections unaffected by intra-partum chemoprophylaxis.Entities:
Keywords: Group B Streptococcus; PFGE; antimicrobial susceptibility; sialic acid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24516454 PMCID: PMC3910203 DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822013000300032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Characteristics of the multiple-strain clonal clusters of 39 GBS isolates in Rio de Janeiro
| Number of isolates | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Serotype | Total | PFGE patterns | Resistance phenotypes | Sialic acid content | ||||
|
|
| |||||||
| SMX/TMP | TET | CLIN | < 2 | 2–4 | ≥ 4 | |||
| Ia | 4 | A1 (2), B1 (1), B2 (1) | R (1) | R (2) | R (1) | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Ib | 2 | A2 (1), C1 (1) | R (1) | R (1) | R (0) | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| II | 3 | D1 (1), D2 (1), E (1) | R (1) | R (2) | R (0) | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| III | 15 | F1 (2), F2 (1), G1 (1), H1 (2), I1 (1), J1 (1), K1 (2), L1 (1), M1 (1), N1 (1), N2 (1), O1 (1) | R (2) | R (12) | R (1) | 3 | 8 | 4 |
| V | 10 | P1 (2), P2 (1), Q1 (1), R1 (1), S1 (2), T1 (1), U1 (1), V1 (1) | R (2) | R (7) | R (1) | 4 | 5 | 1 |
| NT | 5 | W1 (1), W2 (1), X1 (1), Y1 (1), Z1 (1) | R (0) | R (3) | R (0) | 2 | 3 | 0 |
SMX/TMP, trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole; TET, tetracycline; CLIN, clindamycin; NT, non-typeable.
μg/mg of cells dry weight.
Figure 1Phylogenetic analysis of PFGE profiles for GBS isolates. The dendrogram was constructed with PFGE profiles by similarity and clustering analyses using the unweighted-pair group method with arithmetic averages and Dice’s coefficient. The levels of genetic similarity in percentages are shown on the left. The strain serotype and codes PFGE subtype are indicated on the right.