Larry W Forrester1, Anindo Roy2, Amanda Krywonis3, Glenn Kehs4, Hermano Igo Krebs5, Richard F Macko6. 1. University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA VA RR&D Maryland Exercise and Robotics Center of Excellence, Baltimore, MD, USA lforrester@som.umaryland.edu. 2. University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA VA RR&D Maryland Exercise and Robotics Center of Excellence, Baltimore, MD, USA University of Maryland School of Engineering, College Park, MD, USA. 3. University of Maryland Rehabilitation and Orthopaedics Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA University of Maryland Rehabilitation and Orthopaedics Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA. 5. University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. 6. University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA VA RR&D Maryland Exercise and Robotics Center of Excellence, Baltimore, MD, USA Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND. Modular lower extremity robotics may offer a valuable avenue for restoring neuromotor control after hemiparetic stroke. Prior studies show that visually guided and visually evoked practice with an ankle robot (anklebot) improves paretic ankle motor control that translates into improved overground walking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and efficacy of daily anklebot training during early subacute hospitalization poststroke. METHODS:Thirty-four inpatients from a stroke unit were randomly assigned to anklebot (n = 18) or passive manual stretching (n = 16) treatments. All suffered a first stroke with residual hemiparesis (ankle manual muscle test grade 1/5 to 4/5), and at least trace muscle activation in plantar- or dorsiflexion. Anklebot training employed an "assist-as-needed" approach during >200 volitional targeted paretic ankle movements, with difficulty adjusted to active range of motion and success rate. Stretching included >200 daily mobilizations in these same ranges. All sessions lasted 1 hour and assessments were not blinded. RESULTS: Both groups walked faster at discharge; however, the robot group improved more in percentage change of temporal symmetry (P = .032) and also of step length symmetry (P = .038), with longer nonparetic step lengths in the robot (133%) versus stretching (31%) groups. Paretic ankle control improved in the robot group, with increased peak (P ≤ .001) and mean (P ≤ .01) angular speeds, and increased movement smoothness (P ≤ .01). There were no adverse events. CONCLUSION: Though limited by small sample size and restricted entry criteria, our findings suggest that modular lower extremity robotics during early subacute hospitalization is well tolerated and improves ankle motor control and gait patterning.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND. Modular lower extremity robotics may offer a valuable avenue for restoring neuromotor control after hemiparetic stroke. Prior studies show that visually guided and visually evoked practice with an ankle robot (anklebot) improves paretic ankle motor control that translates into improved overground walking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and efficacy of daily anklebot training during early subacute hospitalization poststroke. METHODS: Thirty-four inpatients from a stroke unit were randomly assigned to anklebot (n = 18) or passive manual stretching (n = 16) treatments. All suffered a first stroke with residual hemiparesis (ankle manual muscle test grade 1/5 to 4/5), and at least trace muscle activation in plantar- or dorsiflexion. Anklebot training employed an "assist-as-needed" approach during >200 volitional targeted paretic ankle movements, with difficulty adjusted to active range of motion and success rate. Stretching included >200 daily mobilizations in these same ranges. All sessions lasted 1 hour and assessments were not blinded. RESULTS: Both groups walked faster at discharge; however, the robot group improved more in percentage change of temporal symmetry (P = .032) and also of step length symmetry (P = .038), with longer nonparetic step lengths in the robot (133%) versus stretching (31%) groups. Paretic ankle control improved in the robot group, with increased peak (P ≤ .001) and mean (P ≤ .01) angular speeds, and increased movement smoothness (P ≤ .01). There were no adverse events. CONCLUSION: Though limited by small sample size and restricted entry criteria, our findings suggest that modular lower extremity robotics during early subacute hospitalization is well tolerated and improves ankle motor control and gait patterning.
Authors: Jan F Veneman; Rik Kruidhof; Edsko E G Hekman; Ralf Ekkelenkamp; Edwin H F Van Asseldonk; Herman van der Kooij Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: T George Hornby; Donielle D Campbell; Jennifer H Kahn; Tobey Demott; Jennifer L Moore; Heidi R Roth Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-05-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Andreas Mayr; Markus Kofler; Ellen Quirbach; Heinz Matzak; Katrin Fröhlich; Leopold Saltuari Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2007-05-02 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Konstantinos P Michmizos; Stefano Rossi; Enrico Castelli; Paolo Cappa; Hermano Igo Krebs Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Jan Mehrholz; Simone Thomas; Cordula Werner; Joachim Kugler; Marcus Pohl; Bernhard Elsner Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-05-10