Literature DB >> 24515437

Defying DNA double-strand break-induced death during prophase I meiosis by temporal TAp63α phosphorylation regulation in developing mouse oocytes.

Dal-Ah Kim1, Eun-Kyung Suh.   

Abstract

The dichotomy in DNA damage sensitivity of developing mouse oocytes during female germ line development is striking. Embryonic oocytes withstand hundreds of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) required for meiotic recombination. Postnatal immature oocytes fail to tolerate even a few DSBs induced by gamma radiation treatment. TAp63α, a p53 family member, undergoes phosphorylation and mediates postnatal immature oocyte death following gamma radiation treatment, which is thought important for germ line quality maintenance. Whether prenatal meiotic oocytes tolerate DNA DSBs simply because they lack TAp63α expression is not clear. We found a significant number of oocytes in newborn mice initiate TAp63α expression and simultaneously carry meiotic DNA DSBs. However, the risk of premature death appears unlikely, because newborn oocytes strongly abate TAp63α phosphorylation induction and resist normally lethal doses of ionizing radiation damage. A calyculin A-sensitive Ser/Thr phosphatase activity downregulates TAp63α phosphorylation and ATM kinase mediates phosphorylation. Possible alterations in the relative balance of these counteracting activities during development may first temper TAp63α phosphorylation and death induction during meiotic DNA DSB repair and recombination, and afterward, implement germ line quality control in later stages. Insights into inherent DNA DSB resistance mechanisms in newborn oocytes may help prevent infertility in women in need of radiation or chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24515437      PMCID: PMC3993582          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01223-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  57 in total

Review 1.  Serine/threonine phosphatases in the DNA damage response and cancer.

Authors:  A Peng; J L Maller
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  A positive role for c-Abl in Atm and Atr activation in DNA damage response.

Authors:  X Wang; L Zeng; J Wang; J F L Chau; K P Lai; D Jia; A Poonepalli; M P Hande; H Liu; G He; L He; B Li
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  The p53 family: guardians of maternal reproduction.

Authors:  Arnold J Levine; Richard Tomasini; Frank D McKeon; Tak W Mak; Gerry Melino
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  Ionizing radiation-induced TAp63α phosphorylation at C-terminal S/TQ motifs requires the N-terminal transactivation (TA) domain.

Authors:  Dal-Ah Kim; Byong-Linne Lee; Eun-Kyung Suh
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 5.  Beyond ATM: the protein kinase landscape of the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Ariel Bensimon; Ruedi Aebersold; Yosef Shiloh
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Meiotic recombination provokes functional activation of the p53 regulatory network.

Authors:  Wan-Jin Lu; Joseph Chapo; Ignasi Roig; John M Abrams
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Portrait of an oocyte: our obscure origin.

Authors:  Roger Gosden; Bora Lee
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Repo-man controls a protein phosphatase 1-dependent threshold for DNA damage checkpoint activation.

Authors:  Aimin Peng; Andrea L Lewellyn; William P Schiemann; James L Maller
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.

Authors:  Alberto Ciccia; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  DNA damage in oocytes induces a switch of the quality control factor TAp63α from dimer to tetramer.

Authors:  Gregor B Deutsch; Elisabeth M Zielonka; Daniel Coutandin; Tobias A Weber; Birgit Schäfer; Jens Hannewald; Laura M Luh; Florian G Durst; Mohamed Ibrahim; Jan Hoffmann; Frank H Niesen; Aycan Sentürk; Hana Kunkel; Bernd Brutschy; Enrico Schleiff; Stefan Knapp; Amparo Acker-Palmer; Manuel Grez; Frank McKeon; Volker Dötsch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  The meiotic checkpoint network: step-by-step through meiotic prophase.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi V Subramanian; Andreas Hochwagen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 2.  Biochemical alterations in the oocyte in support of early embryonic development.

Authors:  Jacinta H Martin; Elizabeth G Bromfield; R John Aitken; Brett Nixon
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  CHK2 sets the stage for CK1 in oocyte quality control.

Authors:  Sebastian Kehrloesser; Marcel Tuppi; Volker Dötsch
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 4.  BRCA Mutations, DNA Repair Deficiency, and Ovarian Aging.

Authors:  Kutluk Oktay; Volkan Turan; Shiny Titus; Robert Stobezki; Lin Liu
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  Impeding DNA Break Repair Enables Oocyte Quality Control.

Authors:  Huanyu Qiao; H B D Prasada Rao; Yan Yun; Sumit Sandhu; Jared H Fong; Manali Sapre; Michael Nguyen; Addy Tham; Benjamin W Van; Tiffany Y H Chng; Amy Lee; Neil Hunter
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 6.  Structural Evolution and Dynamics of the p53 Proteins.

Authors:  Giovanni Chillemi; Sebastian Kehrloesser; Francesca Bernassola; Alessandro Desideri; Volker Dötsch; Arnold J Levine; Gerry Melino
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 6.915

7.  Double Strand Break DNA Repair occurs via Non-Homologous End-Joining in Mouse MII Oocytes.

Authors:  Jacinta H Martin; Elizabeth G Bromfield; R John Aitken; Tessa Lord; Brett Nixon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Prenatal androgen exposure and transgenerational susceptibility to polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Sanjiv Risal; Yu Pei; Haojiang Lu; Maria Manti; Romina Fornes; Han-Pin Pui; Zhiyi Zhao; Julie Massart; Claes Ohlsson; Eva Lindgren; Nicolas Crisosto; Manuel Maliqueo; Barbara Echiburú; Amanda Ladrón de Guevara; Teresa Sir-Petermann; Henrik Larsson; Mina A Rosenqvist; Carolyn E Cesta; Anna Benrick; Qiaolin Deng; Elisabet Stener-Victorin
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  High-resolution array-CGH analysis on 46,XX patients affected by early onset primary ovarian insufficiency discloses new genes involved in ovarian function.

Authors:  I Bestetti; C Castronovo; A Sironi; C Caslini; C Sala; R Rossetti; M Crippa; I Ferrari; A Pistocchi; D Toniolo; L Persani; A Marozzi; P Finelli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 10.  Crosstalk between PTEN/PI3K/Akt Signalling and DNA Damage in the Oocyte: Implications for Primordial Follicle Activation, Oocyte Quality and Ageing.

Authors:  Mila Maidarti; Richard A Anderson; Evelyn E Telfer
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.