Literature DB >> 24514094

Susceptibility breakpoints for amphotericin B and Aspergillus species in an in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model simulating free-drug concentrations in human serum.

A Elefanti1, J W Mouton, P E Verweij, L Zerva, J Meletiadis.   

Abstract

Although conventional amphotericin B was for many years the drug of choice and remains an important agent against invasive aspergillosis, reliable susceptibility breakpoints are lacking. Three clinical Aspergillus isolates (Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus, and Aspergillus terreus) were tested in an in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model simulating the biphasic 24-h time-concentration profile of free amphotericin B concentrations in human serum with free peak concentrations (fCmax) of 0.1, 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, and 2.4 mg/liter administered once daily. Drug concentrations were measured with a bioassay, and fungal growth was monitored for 72 h with galactomannan production. The fCmax/MIC corresponding to half-maximal activity (P50) was determined for each species, and the percentage of target attainment was calculated for different MICs for the standard (1 mg/kg of body weight) and a lower (0.6-mg/kg) dose of amphotericin B with Monte Carlo simulation analysis. The fCmax/MICs (95% confidence intervals) corresponding to P50 were 0.145 (0.133 to 0.158), 0.371 (0.283 to 0.486), and 0.41 (0.292 to 0.522) for A. fumigatus, A. flavus, and A. terreus, respectively. The median percentages of P50 attainment were ≥88%, 47%, and 0% for A. fumigatus isolates with MICs of ≤0.5, 1, and ≥2 mg/liter, respectively, and ≥81%, 24%, and 0% and ≥75%, 15%, and 0% for A. flavus and A. terreus isolates with MICs of ≤0.25, 0.5, and ≥1 mg/liter, respectively. The lower dose of 0.6 mg/kg would retain efficacy for A. fumigatus, A. flavus, and A. terreus isolates with MICs of ≤0.25, ≤0.125, and ≤0.125 mg/liter, respectively. The susceptibility, intermediate susceptibility, and resistance breakpoints of ≤0.5, 1, and ≥2 mg/liter for A. fumigatus and ≤0.25, 0.5, and ≥1 mg/liter for A. flavus and A. terreus were determined for conventional amphotericin B with a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model simulating free-drug serum concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24514094      PMCID: PMC4023763          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02661-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  44 in total

1.  Susceptibility testing of Aspergillus flavus: inoculum dependence with itraconazole and lack of correlation between susceptibility to amphotericin B in vitro and outcome in vivo.

Authors:  J Mosquera; P A Warn; J Morrissey; C B Moore; C Gil-Lamaignere; D W Denning
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Amphotericin B resistance of Aspergillus terreus in a murine model of disseminated aspergillosis.

Authors:  E Dannaoui; E Borel; F Persat; M A Piens; S Picot
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Pharmacokinetics, excretion, and mass balance of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) and amphotericin B deoxycholate in humans.

Authors:  Ihor Bekersky; Robert M Fielding; Dawna E Dressler; Jean W Lee; Donald N Buell; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Plasma protein binding of amphotericin B and pharmacokinetics of bound versus unbound amphotericin B after administration of intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) and amphotericin B deoxycholate.

Authors:  Ihor Bekersky; Robert M Fielding; Dawna E Dressler; Jean W Lee; Donald N Buell; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Invasive aspergillosis. Disease spectrum, treatment practices, and outcomes. I3 Aspergillus Study Group.

Authors:  T F Patterson; W R Kirkpatrick; M White; J W Hiemenz; J R Wingard; B Dupont; M G Rinaldi; D A Stevens; J R Graybill
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis.

Authors:  Raoul Herbrecht; David W Denning; Thomas F Patterson; John E Bennett; Reginald E Greene; Jörg-W Oestmann; Winfried V Kern; Kieren A Marr; Patricia Ribaud; Olivier Lortholary; Richard Sylvester; Robert H Rubin; John R Wingard; Paul Stark; Christine Durand; Denis Caillot; Eckhard Thiel; Pranatharthi H Chandrasekar; Michael R Hodges; Haran T Schlamm; Peter F Troke; Ben de Pauw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-08-08       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Susceptibility breakpoints and target values for therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole and Aspergillus fumigatus in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Maria Siopi; Eleftheria Mavridou; Johan W Mouton; Paul E Verweij; Loukia Zerva; Joseph Meletiadis
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of amphotericin B colloidal dispersion versus amphotericin B for treatment of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients.

Authors:  Raleigh Bowden; Pranatharthi Chandrasekar; Mary H White; Xin Li; Larry Pietrelli; Marc Gurwith; Jo-Anne van Burik; Michel Laverdiere; Sharon Safrin; John R Wingard
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-07-25       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  In-vitro testing of susceptibility to amphotericin B is a reliable predictor of clinical outcome in invasive aspergillosis.

Authors:  C Lass-Flörl; G Kofler; G Kropshofer; J Hermans; A Kreczy; M P Dierich; D Niederwieser
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Activity of micafungin (FK463) against an itraconazole-resistant strain of Aspergillus fumigatus and a strain of Aspergillus terreus demonstrating in vivo resistance to amphotericin B.

Authors:  P A Warn; G Morrissey; J Morrissey; D W Denning
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  6 in total

1.  In Vitro and In Vivo Exposure-Effect Relationship of Liposomal Amphotericin B against Aspergillus fumigatus.

Authors:  Maria Siopi; Johan W Mouton; Spyros Pournaras; Joseph Meletiadis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Prognostic value of galactomannan: current evidence for monitoring response to antifungal therapy in patients with invasive aspergillosis.

Authors:  Laura L Kovanda; Amit V Desai; William W Hope
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Optimization of polyene-azole combination therapy against aspergillosis using an in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Maria Siopi; Nikolaos Siafakas; Sophia Vourli; Loukia Zerva; Joseph Meletiadis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Treatment of Aspergillosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Jenks; Martin Hoenigl
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-19

5.  In vitro antifungal susceptibility of clinical and environmental isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus flavus in Brazil.

Authors:  Laura Bedin Denardi; Bianca Hoch Dalla-Lana; Francielli Pantella Kunz de Jesus; Cecília Bittencourt Severo; Janio Morais Santurio; Régis Adriel Zanette; Sydney Hartz Alves
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.257

6.  Widespread amphotericin B-resistant strains of Aspergillus fumigatus in Hamilton, Canada.

Authors:  Eta E Ashu; Gregory A Korfanty; Himeshi Samarasinghe; Nicole Pum; Man You; Deborah Yamamura; Jianping Xu
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.