Literature DB >> 11850269

Plasma protein binding of amphotericin B and pharmacokinetics of bound versus unbound amphotericin B after administration of intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) and amphotericin B deoxycholate.

Ihor Bekersky1, Robert M Fielding, Dawna E Dressler, Jean W Lee, Donald N Buell, Thomas J Walsh.   

Abstract

Unilamellar liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) (liposomal AMB) reduces the toxicity of this antifungal drug. The unique composition of liposomal AMB stabilizes the liposomes, producing higher sustained drug levels in plasma and reducing renal and hepatic excretion. When liposomes release their drug payload, unbound, protein-bound, and liposomal drug pools may exist simultaneously in the body. To determine the amounts of drug in these pools, we developed a procedure to measure unbound AMB in human plasma by ultrafiltration and then used it to characterize AMB binding in vitro and to assess the pharmacokinetics of nonliposomal pools of AMB in a phase IV study of liposomal AMB and AMB deoxycholate in healthy subjects. We confirmed that AMB is highly bound (>95%) in human plasma and showed that both human serum albumin and alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein contribute to this binding. AMB binding exhibited an unusual concentration dependence in plasma: the percentage of bound drug increased as the AMB concentration increased. This was attributed to the low solubility of AMB in plasma, which limits the unbound drug concentration to <1 microg/ml. Subjects given 2 mg of liposomal AMB/kg of body weight had lower exposures (as measured by the maximum concentration of drug in serum and the area under the concentration-time curve) to both unbound and nonliposomal drug than those receiving 0.6 mg of AMB deoxycholate/kg. Most of the AMB in plasma remained liposome associated (97% at 4 h, 55% at 168 h) after liposomal AMB administration, so that unbound drug concentrations remained at <25 ng/ml in all liposomal AMB-treated subjects. Although liposomal AMB markedly reduces the total urinary and fecal recoveries of AMB, urinary and fecal clearances based on unbound AMB were similar (94 to 121 ml h(-1) kg(-1)) for both formulations. Unbound drug urinary clearances were equal to the glomerular filtration rate, and tubular transit rates were <16% of the urinary excretion rate, suggesting that net filtration of unbound drug, with little secretion or reabsorption, is the mechanism of renal clearance for both conventional and liposomal AMB in humans. Unbound drug fecal clearances were also similar for the two formulations. Thus, liposomal AMB increases total AMB concentrations while decreasing unbound AMB concentrations in plasma as a result of sequestration of the drug in long-circulating liposomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11850269      PMCID: PMC127463          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.3.834-840.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  24 in total

Review 1.  Liposomal drug delivery. Advantages and limitations from a clinical pharmacokinetic and therapeutic perspective.

Authors:  R M Fielding
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Toxicological profile and pharmacokinetics of a unilamellar liposomal vesicle formulation of amphotericin B in rats.

Authors:  G W Boswell; I Bekersky; D Buell; R Hiles; T J Walsh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Renal clearance of carprofen in the isolated perfused rat kidney.

Authors:  I Bekersky; W A Colburn
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.922

4.  A high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for the determination of amphotericin B serum concentrations after the administration of AmBisome, a liposomal amphotericin B formulation.

Authors:  A Alak; S Moy; I Bekersky
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.681

5.  Lipid-based amphotericin B formulations: from animals to man.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pharm Sci Technolo Today       Date:  1999-06

6.  Quantitation of free and total amphotericin B in human biologic matrices by a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric method.

Authors:  J W Lee; M E Petersen; P Lin; D Dressler; I Bekersky
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.681

7.  Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group.

Authors:  T J Walsh; R W Finberg; C Arndt; J Hiemenz; C Schwartz; D Bodensteiner; P Pappas; N Seibel; R N Greenberg; S Dummer; M Schuster; J S Holcenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Pharmacokinetics, excretion, and mass balance of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) and amphotericin B deoxycholate in humans.

Authors:  Ihor Bekersky; Robert M Fielding; Dawna E Dressler; Jean W Lee; Donald N Buell; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Interaction of plasma proteins and lipoproteins with amphotericin B.

Authors:  J Brajtburg; S Elberg; J Bolard; G S Kobayashi; R A Levy; R E Ostlund; D Schlessinger; G Medoff
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Effects of aggregation and solvent on the toxicity of amphotericin B to human erythrocytes.

Authors:  P Legrand; E A Romero; B E Cohen; J Bolard
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  69 in total

1.  Comparative drug disposition, urinary pharmacokinetics, and renal effects of multilamellar liposomal nystatin and amphotericin B deoxycholate in rabbits.

Authors:  Andreas H Groll; Diana Mickiene; Vidmantas Petraitis; Ruta Petraitiene; Raul M Alfaro; Christine King; Stephen C Piscitelli; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Antifungal agents: in vitro susceptibility testing, pharmacodynamics, and prospects for combination therapy.

Authors:  A H Groll; H Kolve
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  In Vitro and In Vivo Exposure-Effect Relationship of Liposomal Amphotericin B against Aspergillus fumigatus.

Authors:  Maria Siopi; Johan W Mouton; Spyros Pournaras; Joseph Meletiadis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Pharmacodynamic activity of amphotericin B deoxycholate is associated with peak plasma concentrations in a neutropenic murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.

Authors:  Nathan P Wiederhold; Vincent H Tam; Jingduan Chi; Randall A Prince; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis; Russell E Lewis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Synthesis of a highly water-soluble derivative of amphotericin B with attenuated proinflammatory activity.

Authors:  Samusi A Adediran; Timothy P Day; Diptesh Sil; Matthew R Kimbrell; Hemamali J Warshakoon; Subbalakshmi S Malladi; Sunil A David
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Renal handling of amphotericin B and amphotericin B-deoxycholate and potential renal drug-drug interactions with selected antivirals.

Authors:  František Trejtnar; Jana Mandíková; Jana Kočíncová; Marie Volková
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Amphotericin B lipid complex in the management of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Franco Aversa; Filippo Ballerini; Fabio Benedetti; Alessandro Busca; Nicola Cascavilla; Ercole Concia; Andrea Tendas; Francesco Di Raimondo; Patrizio Mazza; Anna Maria Nosari; Giuseppe Rossi
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  Population pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B lipid complex in neonates.

Authors:  Gudrun Würthwein; Andreas H Groll; Georg Hempel; Felice C Adler-Shohet; Jay M Lieberman; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetics of antifungal drugs: practical implications for optimized treatment of patients.

Authors:  Romuald Bellmann; Piotr Smuszkiewicz
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 10.  Antifungals in systemic neonatal candidiasis.

Authors:  Daniel A C Frattarelli; Michael D Reed; George P Giacoia; Jacob V Aranda
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.