Literature DB >> 24512637

Quantitative proteomic analysis of the Salmonella-lettuce interaction.

Yuping Zhang1, Renu Nandakumar, Shannon L Bartelt-Hunt, Daniel D Snow, Laurie Hodges, Xu Li.   

Abstract

Human pathogens can internalize food crops through root and surface uptake and persist inside crop plants. The goal of the study was to elucidate the global modulation of bacteria and plant protein expression after Salmonella internalizes lettuce. A quantitative proteomic approach was used to analyse the protein expression of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis and lettuce cultivar Green Salad Bowl 24 h after infiltrating S. Infantis into lettuce leaves. Among the 50 differentially expressed proteins identified by comparing internalized S. Infantis against S. Infantis grown in Luria Broth, proteins involved in glycolysis were down-regulated, while one protein involved in ascorbate uptake was up-regulated. Stress response proteins, especially antioxidant proteins, were up-regulated. The modulation in protein expression suggested that internalized S. Infantis might utilize ascorbate as a carbon source and require multiple stress response proteins to cope with stresses encountered in plants. On the other hand, among the 20 differentially expressed lettuce proteins, proteins involved in defense response to bacteria were up-regulated. Moreover, the secreted effector PipB2 of S. Infantis and R proteins of lettuce were induced after bacterial internalization into lettuce leaves, indicating human pathogen S. Infantis triggered the defense mechanisms of lettuce, which normally responds to plant pathogens.
© 2014 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24512637      PMCID: PMC4265081          DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Biotechnol        ISSN: 1751-7915            Impact factor:   5.813


Introduction

Outbreaks of diseases associated with contamination of fresh produce by human pathogens have increased in the past decades (Lynch et al., 2009; Schikora et al., 2012). Better practice during postharvest processing or the use of a terminal control such as disinfection could reduce the load of microorganisms on the surfaces of fresh produce. However, concerns are raised over food crops contaminated with human pathogens that get internalized in plants during field production, because washing or disinfection may not be effective to remove the internalized bacteria (Wei et al., 1995; Weissinger et al., 2000). Human pathogens can internalize into plants through root or leaf uptake. Salmonella enterica serovars Cubana and Dublin can accumulate inside hydroponically grown alfalfa and lettuce, respectively, through root uptake both at the level of 4 log CFU/g fresh weight (Dong et al., 2003; Klerks et al., 2007,2007). Internalization of human pathogens can also occur through root uptake when the pathogens are introduced by contaminated soil or irrigation water (Wachtel et al., 2002; Hora et al., 2005; Klerks et al., 2007,2007). A recent study on leaf uptake shows that spray irrigation with contaminated water can lead to the internalization of Escherichia coli O157:H7 into spinach leaves (Erickson et al., 2010). The fate of human pathogens inside plants is determined by their interaction with plants. Schikora and colleagues (2001) found that Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infiltrated into Arabidopsis leaves multiplied within the first 2 days after infiltration and remained viable for at least 4 days. Escherichia coli O157:H7 could survive inside spinach leaves for up to 14 days after spray inoculation (Erickson et al., 2010). In contrast, internalized S. Newport could not be detected in basil leaves 22 h after introducing the bacteria by placing cut petiole in a bacteria suspension (Gorbatsevich et al., 2013). Despite the important findings reported in these studies, it is still poorly understood how internalized human pathogens adjust their metabolism to survive inside plants. In recent years, mRNA-based transcriptomic approaches have been used to examine the gene expression of human pathogens living in and on plants. After spray-inoculated on lettuce leaf surface for 1–3 days, E. coli K-12 and O157:H7 up-regulated genes associated with starvation and curli production (Fink et al., 2012). Similarly, E. coli K-12 cells that were attached to and internalized inside the lettuce root up-regulated genes involved in attachment, stress responses and protein synthesis (Hou et al., 2012). After 15–30 min of exposure to lettuce leaf lysates, E. coli O157:H7 up-regulated its flagellar machinery, fimbrial, type III secretion system (T3SS) (a virulent factor) and stress response (especially oxidative stress) genes (Kyle et al., 2010). Collectively, these observations suggest that human pathogens encounter stresses in plants and the temporal changes in the expression of certain genes depend on the location of the bacteria (i.e. outside or inside the plant root or leaf). Despite the important information gained from these transcriptomic studies, it should be noted that the expressional levels of mRNA and proteins are not directly proportional and transcriptomics cannot detect post-translational modifications on proteins (Abbott, 1999). Different from transcriptomics, proteomics directly studies the ultimate products of gene expression. Although the advantages of using proteomics to study bacterial adaptation to plant-associated environments has been recognized (Knief et al., 2011), the application of proteomics in studying the interaction between human pathogens and plants has been limited. The objective of this study was to investigate the proteomic responses of Salmonella after internalizing lettuce leaf and the proteomic responses of lettuce leaf to internalized Salmonella. Two-dimensional nanoliquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (2D nano LC-MS/MS) approach was utilized for the quantitative shotgun proteomic analysis. Two comparisons were made: global proteome profiles of internalized Salmonella versus Salmonella grown in Luria Broth (LB), and proteome profiles of lettuce leaf containing internalized Salmonella versus lettuce leaf without internalized Salmonella.

Results and discussion

Quantitative proteomic analysis

Leaves of 5-week old leafy lettuce (Lactuca sativa) cultivar Green Salad Bowl were inoculated by Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis (S. Infantis) suspension using syringe infiltration (Katagiri et al., 2002). Because previous experiences with syringe infiltration showed only a fraction of the cells in a bacterial suspension could end up in leaves, 300 μl of 1010 CFU/ml bacterial culture (stationary phase S. Infantis grown in Luria Broth), which was washed and re-suspended in sterile water, was infiltrated to ensure sufficient internalized S. Infantis cells to elicit significant proteomic response. Control plants were infiltrated with the same amount of sterile water. Two biological replicates were included in each group (i.e. treatment and control groups). Lettuce leaves were harvested 24 h after infiltration, and bacteria on the leaf surface were removed by sonication and vortexing for 4 times. Bacterial and plant proteins in lettuce leaf samples containing internalized S. Infantis were separated (details in Supporting Information). In addition, bacterial protein was extracted from stationary phase S. Infantis grown in LB and plant proteins from lettuce leaf without internalized S. Infantis. Protein digestion and 2D LC-MS/MS analysis were performed as previously described in the literature (Nandakumar et al., 2011; Li et al., 2012). The acquired MS/MS spectra from the bacterial protein samples were searched against the S. Typhimurium 14028S database (5323 sequences), and those from the lettuce protein samples against both the Lactuca sativa expressed sequence tag (EST) database (128172 sequences) and a custom-made database including Lactuca sativa protein sequences (1506 entries) on NCBI (Cho et al., 2009). The criteria for protein identification included the detection of at least one unique peptide per protein and a protein probability score of ≥90%. Relative quantitation of proteins was done by using the label-free method of spectral counting (Liu et al., 2004) with the normalized spectral counts for each protein. Proteins having ≥ 2-fold change in abundance (P ≤ 0.05) were considered as differentially expressed. More details about the methods can be found in Supporting Information.

Protein expression profile of S. Infantis

The protein expression profile was compared between the S. Infantis internalized in lettuce leaves (i.e. 24 h after infiltration) and the stationary-phase S. Infantis grown in LB medium (i.e. immediately before infiltration). A total of 541 proteins were detected, and 50 proteins were differentially expressed (≥ 2-fold and P < 0.05), among which 34 proteins were up-regulated and 16 were down-regulated (Table 1).
Table 1

Proteins that were differentially expressed in S. Infantis after internalization into lettuce

Protein nameUniprot AccessionGeneFold changeP-value# of unique peptides
Metabolism
Carbon
Putative PTS system, ascorbate-specific IIB componentD0ZQJ737.0<1.0E-042
Alcohol dehydrogenaseD0ZXP4adhP−5.9<1.0E-047
Phosphopyruvate hydrataseD0ZVP5eno−8.8<1.0E-047
Amino acid
Tryptophan synthase subunit alphaD0ZIZ5trpA20.6<1.0E-041
Aspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenaseD0ZJH4asd5.3<1.0E-041
Putative aspartate racemaseD0ZU785.0<1.0E-041
Nucleotide
AllantoinaseD0ZP18allB3.53.4E-022
Cytidylate kinaseD0ZSI5cmk6.55.1E-041
DihydroorotaseD0ZUK7pyrC20.5<1.0E-041
Lipid
Acyl carrier proteinD0ZUP3acpP2.0<1.0E-043
Cofactors and vitamins
Adenosylcobinamide kinaseD0ZMB8cobU4.01.7E-021
Protein synthesis
50S Ribosomal protein L13D0ZY47rplM4.58.8E-032
Transcriptional regulatorD0ZR7410.5<1.0E-041
tRNA-dihydrouridine synthase CD0ZNJ3yohl6.01.1E-032
DNA binding proteinD0ZU24stpA4.01.7E-021
23S rRNA 5-methyluridine methyltransferaseD0ZVQ3rlmD4.01.7E-021
30S Ribosomal subunit S22D0ZXP1rpsV-5.71.9E-023
Pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs)
FlagellinD0ZL85fliC-6.01.2E-024
Elongation factor TuD0ZIM1tuf_1-2.13.2E-039
Lipid A biosynthesis lauroyl acyltransferaseD0ZUJ8htrB5.8<1.0E-041
Stress response
Superoxide dismutaseD0ZWV7sodB7.02.4E-041
Superoxide dismutaseD0ZWW6sodC_22.56.3E-032
Putative thiol-alkyl hydroperoxide reductaseD0ZMY22.02.7E-033
Bacterioferritin, iron storage and detoxification proteinD0ZIL8bfr7.02.4E-041
NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (quinone)D0ZTQ2wraB3.31.2E-023
Putative intracellular proteinaseD0ZXW4yhbO−25.0<1.0E-044
ChaperoninD0ZS62groL−2.52.6E-02
ThioredoxinD0ZNP5trxA−8.71.3E-047
Transcriptional regulator HU subunit alphaD0ZQX4hupA−2.5<1.0E-045
Hypothetical protein STM14_1832D0ZXI6ydeI−11.0<1.0E-043
Cell envelope
dTDP-Glucose 4,6-dehydrataseD0ZNQ1rffG5.52.2E-031
Transport
Hypothetical protein STM14_1021D0ZS98ybjL6.01.1E-033
Sodium/panthothenate symporterD0ZIF6panF4.58.8E-032
Low affinity gluconate transporterD0ZJH7gntU2.05.7E-031
Putative ABC-type multidrug transport system ATPase componentD0ZKD9yhiH3.53.4E-021
Unknown
Hypothetical protein STM14_0531D0ZN355.52.2E-031
Phage tail component H-like proteinD0ZST42.21.9E-022
Putative cytoplasmic proteinD0ZXI36.5<1.0E-041
Putative cytoplasmic proteinD0ZIZ8yciE2.0<1.0E-049
Hypothetical protein STM14_2884D0ZQJ3yfcC6.01.1E-031
Hypothetical protein STM14_3293D0ZTU4yfjG4.01.7E-021
Hypothetical protein STM14_4694D0ZMW1yifE2.41.7E-021
Putative type II restriction enzyme methylase subunitD0ZU545.52.2E-031
Hypothetical protein STM14_0428D0ZM36yahO−5.71.9E-022
Hypothetical protein STM14_0454D0ZM62psiF−3.97.5E-044
Putative cytoplasmic proteinD0ZVJ6−14.01.0E-042
Hypothetical protein STM14_1588D0ZW41spy−5.42.8E-023
Putative cytoplasmic proteinD0ZJ87−6.37.9E-031
Hypothetical protein STM14_4278D0ZJJ1yhhA−8.82.1E-042
Proteins that were differentially expressed in S. Infantis after internalization into lettuce

Metabolism

The most significant change among all differentially expressed bacterial proteins, a 37-fold increase, was seen in a putative cytoplasmic protein. The protein is determined to be an ascorbate-specific IIB component and is believed to phosphorylate ascorbate during transmembrane transport. Interestingly, ascorbate (vitamin C) is abundant in lettuce leaf [9.2 mg/100 g (USDA, 2013)], and Salmonella has been reported to be capable of consuming ascorbate when its preferred carbon sources are not available (Eddy and Ingram, 1953). Phosphopyruvate hydratase and alcohol dehydrogenase, two enzymes involved in glycolysis, were down-regulated 8.8- and 5.9-fold respectively. In addition, several enzymes involved in glycolysis (i.e. 6-phosphofructokinase, phosphoglycerate kinase and phosphoglycerate mutases) were detected only in the Salmonella grown in LB but not in the Salmonella grown in lettuce leaves (Fig. 1). Glycolysis starts with glucose and fructose, which are present in leaf lettuce at the levels of 0.36 g and 0.43 g per 100 g respectively (USDA, 2013). The decrease in the abundance of multiple enzymes involved in glycolysis suggests that these monosaccharides may not be available to Salmonella inside lettuce leaves. Alternatively, internalized Salmonella may utilize less preferred but available substrates, such as ascorbate. In plants, the level of ascorbate increases under stress conditions, such as pathogen invasion (Noctor and Foyer, 1998).
Fig 1

Changes in selective metabolic pathways (i.e. glycolysis, amino acid metabolism, ascorbate metabolism and TCA) of Salmonella internalized in lettuce leaves compared to Salmonella grown in LB. Proteins shown are: (1) 6-phosphofructokinase; (2) phosphoglycerate kinase; (3) 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglycerate mutase; (4) 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-dependent phosphoglycerate mutase; (5) phosphopyruvate hydratase; (6) alcohol dehydrogenase; (7) putative PTS system, ascorbate-specific IIB component; (8) tryptophan synthase subunit alpha; (9) L-asparaginase; (10) putative aspartate racemase; (11) aspartate kinase; (12) aspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase; (13) malate dehydrogenase.

Changes in selective metabolic pathways (i.e. glycolysis, amino acid metabolism, ascorbate metabolism and TCA) of Salmonella internalized in lettuce leaves compared to Salmonella grown in LB. Proteins shown are: (1) 6-phosphofructokinase; (2) phosphoglycerate kinase; (3) 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglycerate mutase; (4) 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-dependent phosphoglycerate mutase; (5) phosphopyruvate hydratase; (6) alcohol dehydrogenase; (7) putative PTS system, ascorbate-specific IIB component; (8) tryptophan synthase subunit alpha; (9) L-asparaginase; (10) putative aspartate racemase; (11) aspartate kinase; (12) aspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase; (13) malate dehydrogenase.

Stress response

Stress response proteins accounted for a major class of the differentially expressed proteins (Table 1). Several proteins involved in response to oxidative stress were up-regulated. Superoxide dismutase (SodC_2, up-regulated 2.5-fold) is a periplasmic or membrane-associated protein in several gram-negative bacteria, and protects bacteria from extracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Battistoni, 2003). Another superoxide dismutase (SodB, up-regulated 7-fold) is an intracellular protein, and removes ROS produced by aerobic metabolism (Farrant et al., 1997). Bacterioferritin, an iron storage and detoxification protein (Bfr, up-regulated 7-fold) is the major Fe storage protein in S. Typhimurium. It sequesters Fe to prevent generating highly toxic hydroxyl radical (Fe2+ + H2O2 → Fe3+ + OH− + OH•) when Fe is in excess and releases Fe when exogenous Fe is limiting (Velayudhan et al., 2007). Salmonella bfr mutants appeared to be more susceptible to oxidative stress than the wild type (Velayudhan et al., 2007). Under the control of the central regulator of general stress responses RpoS (Patridge and Ferry, 2006), NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (quinone) (WraB, up-regulated 3.3-fold) is often up-regulated under stresses such as acid, salt and H2O2 (Pomposiello et al., 2001; Tucker et al., 2002; Cheung et al., 2003). Finally, putative thiol-alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (up-regulated 2.0-fold) is an antioxidant, which can scavenge H2O2 and enhance oxidative stress resistance (Hebrard et al., 2009). Because generating ROS is a universal defensive strategy employed by plants when challenged by pathogenic or beneficial bacteria (Shetty et al., 2008), it is not surprising that internalized Salmonella up-regulated multiple proteins to resist ROS. Interestingly, about half of the stress response proteins that were differentially expressed were down-regulated in internalized Salmonella (Table 1). Chaperonin (GroL, down-regulated 2.5-fold) refolds and assembles unfolded polypeptides (Sherman and Goldberg, 1992), and is essential in cell growth and survival under heat and acid stresses (Baumann et al., 1996; Hartke et al., 1997). Genes coding for transcriptional regulator (HupA, down-regulated 2.5-fold) and putative intracellular proteinase (YhbO, down-regulated 25-fold) can increase the survival of S. Typhimurium under the exposure to artificial sea water (Haznedaroglu, 2010), and the latter can act in response to oxidative, thermal, UV and pH stresses (Abdallah et al., 2007).

Pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs)

PAMPs from bacteria can be recognized by host plants and can trigger plants' basal defense responses. Known PAMPs include flagellin, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) (Chisholm et al., 2006; Zipfel, 2008). In this study, flagellin and EF-Tu were down-regulated, while lipid A biosynthesis lauroyl acyltransferase (htrB) involved in LPS biosynthesis was up-regulated (Table 1). Although flagella, which are composed of flagellin, facilitate Salmonella to move toward plant roots or attach to plant leaf surface (Cooley et al., 2003; Kroupitski et al., 2009), they provide little benefit to endophytic bacteria because the endophytes are usually nonmotile upon entering plants (Hattermann and Ries, 1989; Kamoun and Kado, 1990). Studies reported that flagella mutants of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella could survive better in Arabidopsis and in alfalfa (Medicago sativa), respectively, than respective wild types (Iniguez et al., 2005; Seo and Matthews, 2012), suggesting that the down-regulation of flagellin may increase the fitness of human pathogens in plants.

Type III secretion system (T3SS)

In addition to the differentially expressed proteins reported in Table 1, secreted effector protein (PipB2) was detected in internalized Salmonella but not in LB-grown Salmonella. PipB2 can be secreted via T3SS-2, which is often expressed after Salmonella has entered an epithelial cell or a macrophage. T3SS-1 enables bacterial invasion of epithelial cells, and T3SS-2 enhances bacterial survival and replication in epithelial cells (Waterman and Holden, 2003). A recent study demonstrated that Salmonella could suppress the immune system of Arabidopsis plants using T3SS-1 and T3SS-2 (Schikora et al., 2011).

Protein expression profile of lettuce

Two databases were used to identify lettuce proteins: expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences of Lactuca sativa from CGPDB and a custom-built database comprising Lettuce protein sequences available in NCBI (Cho et al., 2009). A total of 289 lettuce proteins were identified using the EST database with 174 and 189 proteins detected in lettuce without and with internalized Salmonella, respectively. Because lettuce sequences in the EST database are not annotated, the sequence hits from the EST database were blasted against the proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana for functional information (Cho et al., 2009). Among the lettuce proteins that are homologous to A. thaliana proteins, 17 proteins were up-regulated and 3 were down-regulated (Table 2). Using the custom-built lettuce protein database, among the 163 proteins identified, 25 proteins were detected only in lettuce with internalized Salmonella but not in control lettuce (Supporting Information, Table S1).
Table 2

Proteins that were differentially expressed in lettuce after internalization of S. infantis

Protein nameUniprot AccessionGeneFold changeP-value# of unique peptides
Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 subunit beta-1Q38799PDH27.5<1.0E-042
Triosephosphate isomeraseP48491CTIMC2.31.9E-022
Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase 1F4IGL7FBA1−7.25.8E-031
2-cys PeroxiredoxinQ96291BAS110.05.5E-041
Actin 4P53497ACT123.52.4E-021
Nucleoside diphosphate kinaseP39207NDPK12.92.8E-021
Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activaseF4IVZ7RCA−4.84.1E-022
Selenoprotein, Rdx typeQ8W1E5AT5G586404.03.6E-031
Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn] 1P24704CSD14.31.2E-022
calmodulin 5P59220CAM75.72.4E-021
Plasma membrane-associated cation-binding protein 1Q96262PCAP13.33.0E-021
Oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 3-2Q41932PSBQ22.9<1.0E-043
Oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 1–2Q9S841PSBO23.52.4E-022
Two-component response regulator-like APRR2Q6LA43APRR22.34.5E-031
30S Ribosomal protein S31, chloroplasticO80439RPS313.92.3E-031
Ferredoxin-NADP reductase, leaf-type isozyme 2Q8W493LFNR22.76.8E-042
40S Ribosomal protein S8-2Q9FIF3RPS8B6.05.5E-041
photosystem I reaction center subunit 2-2Q9S714PSAE24.01.2E-022
50S Ribosomal protein L12-1, chloroplasticP36210RPL12A4.14.8E-022
Purple acid phosphatase 13Q9SIV9PAP10−4.8<1.0E-041
Proteins that were differentially expressed in lettuce after internalization of S. infantis Several lettuce proteins were up-regulated in response to S. Infantis internalization (Table 2). Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 subunit beta-1 (up-regulated 7.5-fold) is considered a PAMP-responsive protein. It increased in abundance when Arabidopsis was challenged by a hrpA mutant of Pseudomonas syringae, which could only activate plant basal defense (Jones et al., 2006; Jones and Dangl, 2006). 2-cys Peroxiredoxin (up-regulated 10-fold) may play a role in defense-related redox signaling, because it can reduce reactive nitrogen peroxides generated during incompatible interactions during which the host resists to bacteria and no disease develops (Jones et al., 2004). Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn] 1 was up-regulated 4.3 fold, possibly as a self-protective antioxidant response to the plant ROS induced by internalized Salmonella (Jagadeeswaran et al., 2009). Ferredoxin–NADP reductase, which was up-regulated 2.7-fold following Salmonella internalization, plays a key role in regulating the relative amounts of cyclic and non-cyclic electron flow to meet plant demand for ATP and reducing power (Hanke et al., 2005; Lintala et al., 2007). Its involvement in defense response to bacteria has been inferred from computational annotation and expression patterns (Jones et al., 2006; Jones and Dangl, 2006; Heyndrickx and Vandepoele, 2012). Using the custom-built lettuce protein database, several predicted resistance proteins (RGC1C, RGC2, RGC2C, RGC2K and NBS-LRR resistance-like protein 4T) and a putative ethylene receptor ETR1 (Supporting Information, Table S1) were detected in only lettuce containing internalized S. Infantis. This suggests Salmonella might have induced the expression of resistance proteins (R proteins), and ethylene might be involved in its regulation. It is known that R proteins can recognize specific effectors secreted by pathogens, leading to the hypersensitive response that prevents the pathogens from growing or spreading inside infected plants (Jones and Dangl, 2006). Ethylene along with salicylic acid and jasmonic acid are the three plant hormones involving signaling and regulating R proteins (Jones and Dangl, 2006). A few studies investigated plant responses to human pathogens using transcriptomics. Plant pathogenicity-related genes PR1, PR4, PR5 and DAD1 were induced in lettuce leaf 2 days after S. Dublin entered plants through a hydroponic growing medium (Klerks et al., 2007,2007). The PR genes encode pathogenicity-related proteins, which can be induced as part of systemic acquired resistance (Durrant and Dong, 2004). The expression of PR1 in alfalfa and Arabidopsis was up-regulated by the internalization of S. Typhimurium (Iniguez et al., 2005; Schikora et al., 2001), likely resulting from sensing the T3SS-1 effectors of Salmonella (Iniguez et al., 2005). In this study, several R proteins were also induced by Salmonella, and the secreted effector PipB2 (T3SS-2 effectors) was concurrently detected in internalized S. Infantis.

Concluding remarks

In summary, the global modulation of protein expression revealed S. Infantis may utilize alternative carbon sources such as ascorbate upon internalization because the preferred substrate/carbon sources were not available inside lettuce leaves. In the meanwhile, S. Infantis produced multiple stress response proteins to cope with the stresses encountered inside plants. On the other hand, proteins involved in lettuce's defense response to bacterium were up-regulated, such as pyruvate dehydrogenase, 2-cys peroxiredoxin and ferredoxin–NADP reductase. Interestingly, the secreted effector PipB2 of S. Infantis and R proteins of lettuce were concurrently induced during the interaction between Salmonella and lettuce.
  50 in total

1.  A post-genomic challenge: learning to read patterns of protein synthesis.

Authors:  A Abbott
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Bacterial adaptation to life in association with plants - A proteomic perspective from culture to in situ conditions.

Authors:  Claudia Knief; Nathanaël Delmotte; Julia A Vorholt
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.984

3.  Regulation of enteric endophytic bacterial colonization by plant defenses.

Authors:  A Leonardo Iniguez; Yuemei Dong; Heather D Carter; Brian M M Ahmer; Julie M Stone; Eric W Triplett
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  Kinetics and strain specificity of rhizosphere and endophytic colonization by enteric bacteria on seedlings of Medicago sativa and Medicago truncatula.

Authors:  Yuemei Dong; A Leonardo Iniguez; Brian M M Ahmer; Eric W Triplett
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Gene expression profiling of the pH response in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Don L Tucker; Nancy Tucker; Tyrrell Conway
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Quantitative proteomic profiling of the Escherichia coli response to metallic copper surfaces.

Authors:  Renu Nandakumar; Christophe Espirito Santo; Nandakumar Madayiputhiya; Gregor Grass
Journal:  Biometals       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 2.949

7.  WrbA from Escherichia coli and Archaeoglobus fulgidus is an NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase.

Authors:  Eric V Patridge; James G Ferry
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 8.  Systemic acquired resistance.

Authors:  W E Durrant; X Dong
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 13.078

9.  Internalization of Salmonella enterica in leaves is induced by light and involves chemotaxis and penetration through open stomata.

Authors:  Yulia Kroupitski; Dana Golberg; Eduard Belausov; Riky Pinto; Dvora Swartzberg; David Granot; Shlomo Sela
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  YhbO protects cells against multiple stresses.

Authors:  Jad Abdallah; Teresa Caldas; Fatoum Kthiri; Renée Kern; Gilbert Richarme
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  3 in total

1.  Dissection of allelic interactions among Pto-miR257 and its targets and their effects on growth and wood properties in Populus.

Authors:  B Chen; Q Du; J Chen; X Yang; J Tian; B Li; D Zhang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Effect of Rocket (Eruca sativa) Extract on MRSA Growth and Proteome: Metabolic Adjustments in Plant-Based Media.

Authors:  Agapi I Doulgeraki; Georgios Efthimiou; Spiros Paramithiotis; Katherine M Pappas; Milton A Typas; George-John Nychas
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Complete proteome of a quinolone-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium phage type DT104B clinical strain.

Authors:  Susana Correia; Júlio D Nunes-Miranda; Luís Pinto; Hugo M Santos; María de Toro; Yolanda Sáenz; Carmen Torres; José Luis Capelo; Patrícia Poeta; Gilberto Igrejas
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.