Literature DB >> 15720086

Regulation of enteric endophytic bacterial colonization by plant defenses.

A Leonardo Iniguez1, Yuemei Dong, Heather D Carter, Brian M M Ahmer, Julie M Stone, Eric W Triplett.   

Abstract

Bacterial endophytes reside within the interior of plants without causing disease or forming symbiotic structures. Some endophytes, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae 342 (Kp342), enhance plant growth and nutrition. Others, such as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. typhimurium), are human pathogens that contaminate raw produce. Several lines of evidence are presented here to support the hypothesis that plant defense response pathways regulate colonization by endophytic bacteria. An ethylene-insensitive mutant of Medicago truncatula is hypercolonized by Kp342 compared to the parent genotype. Addition of ethylene, a signal molecule for induced systemic resistance in plants, decreased endophytic colonization in Medicago spp. This ethylene-mediated inhibition of endophytic colonization was reversed by addition of the ethylene action inhibitor, 1-methylcyclopropene. Colonization of Medicago spp. by S. typhimurium also was affected by exogenous ethylene. Mutants lacking flagella or a component of the type III secretion system of Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (TTSS-SPI1) colonize the interior of Medicago spp. in higher numbers than the wild type. Arabidopsis defense response-related genotypes indicated that only salicylic acid (SA)-independent defense responses contribute to restricting colonization by Kp342. In contrast, colonization by S. typhimurium is affected by both SA-dependent and -independent responses. S. typhimurium mutants further delineated these responses, suggesting that both flagella and TTSS-SPI1 effectors can be recognized. Flagella act primarily through SA-independent responses (compromising SA accumulation still affected colonization in the absence of flagella). Removal of a TTSS-SPI1 effector resulted in hypercolonization regardless of whether the genotype was affected in either SA-dependent or SA-independent responses. Consistent with these results, S. typhimurium activates the promoter of PR1, a SA-dependent pathogenesis-related gene, while S. typhimurium mutants lacking the TTSS-SPI1 failed to activate this promoter. These observations suggest approaches to reduce contamination of raw produce by human enteric pathogens and to increase the number of growth-promoting bacteria in plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15720086     DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-18-0169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact        ISSN: 0894-0282            Impact factor:   4.171


  70 in total

1.  Influence of prgH on the Persistence of Ingested Salmonella enterica in the Leafhopper Macrosteles quadrilineatus.

Authors:  José Pablo Dundore-Arias; Russell L Groves; Jeri D Barak
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  The majority of in vitro macrophage activation exhibited by extracts of some immune enhancing botanicals is due to bacterial lipoproteins and lipopolysaccharides.

Authors:  Nirmal D Pugh; Hemlata Tamta; Premalatha Balachandran; Xiangmei Wu; J'Lynn Howell; Franck E Dayan; David S Pasco
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 4.932

3.  Restructuring of endophytic bacterial communities in grapevine yellows-diseased and recovered Vitis vinifera L. plants.

Authors:  Daniela Bulgari; Paola Casati; Paola Crepaldi; Daniele Daffonchio; Fabio Quaglino; Lorenzo Brusetti; Piero Attilio Bianco
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Regulation of bacterial virulence by Csr (Rsm) systems.

Authors:  Christopher A Vakulskas; Anastasia H Potts; Paul Babitzke; Brian M M Ahmer; Tony Romeo
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  Unveiling the putative functional genes present in root-associated endophytic microbiome from maize plant using the shotgun approach.

Authors:  Ayomide Emmanuel Fadiji; Ayansina Segun Ayangbenro; Olubukola Oluranti Babalola
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Virulence Gene Regulation by L-Arabinose in Salmonella enterica.

Authors:  Javier López-Garrido; Elena Puerta-Fernández; Ignacio Cota; Josep Casadesús
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Influence of the plant defense response to Escherichia coli O157:H7 cell surface structures on survival of that enteric pathogen on plant surfaces.

Authors:  Suengwook Seo; Karl R Matthews
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Factors Required for Adhesion of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium to Corn Salad (Valerianella locusta).

Authors:  Laura Elpers; Juliane Kretzschmar; Sean-Paul Nuccio; Andreas J Bäumler; Michael Hensel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Specific responses of Salmonella enterica to tomato varieties and fruit ripeness identified by in vivo expression technology.

Authors:  Jason T Noel; Nabil Arrach; Ali Alagely; Michael McClelland; Max Teplitski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Use of Attenuated but Metabolically Competent Salmonella as a Probiotic To Prevent or Treat Salmonella Infection.

Authors:  Anice Sabag-Daigle; Henry M Blunk; Juan F Gonzalez; Brandi L Steidley; Prosper N Boyaka; Brian M M Ahmer
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.