Literature DB >> 24512561

The practice of going helps children to stop: the importance of context monitoring in inhibitory control.

Nicolas Chevalier1, Christopher H Chatham2, Yuko Munakata3.   

Abstract

How do we stop ourselves during ongoing action? Recent work implies that stopping per se is easy given sufficient monitoring of contextual cues signaling the need to change action. We test key implications of this idea for improving inhibitory control. Seven- to 9-year-old children practiced stopping an ongoing action or monitoring for cues that signaled the need to go again. Both groups subsequently showed better response inhibition in a Stop-Signal task than active controls, and practice monitoring yielded a dose-response relationship. When monitoring practice was optimized to occur while children engaged in responding, the greatest benefits were observed-even greater than from practicing stopping itself. These findings demonstrate the importance of monitoring processes in developing response inhibition and suggest promising new directions for interventions. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24512561      PMCID: PMC4057641          DOI: 10.1037/a0035868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  23 in total

1.  The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.

Authors:  A Miyake; N P Friedman; M J Emerson; A H Witzki; A Howerter; T D Wager
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Paul C Fletcher; Ed T Bullmore; Barbara J Sahakian; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Pupillometric and behavioral markers of a developmental shift in the temporal dynamics of cognitive control.

Authors:  Christopher H Chatham; Michael J Frank; Yuko Munakata
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Bayesian parametric estimation of stop-signal reaction time distributions.

Authors:  Dora Matzke; Conor V Dolan; Gordon D Logan; Scott D Brown; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-11-19

6.  Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten.

Authors:  Clancy Blair; Rachel Peters Razza
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr

7.  A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety.

Authors:  Terrie E Moffitt; Louise Arseneault; Daniel Belsky; Nigel Dickson; Robert J Hancox; Honalee Harrington; Renate Houts; Richie Poulton; Brent W Roberts; Stephen Ross; Malcolm R Sears; W Murray Thomson; Avshalom Caspi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Executive "brake failure" following deactivation of human frontal lobe.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Mark A Bellgrove; Mark G Stokes; Tracy R Henderson; Hugh Garavan; Ian H Robertson; Adam P Morris; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Hugh Garavan; Mark A Bellgrove
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Dissociating inhibition, attention, and response control in the frontoparietal network using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chris M Dodds; Sharon Morein-Zamir; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  18 in total

1.  Sensory processes modulate differences in multi-component behavior and cognitive control between childhood and adulthood.

Authors:  Krutika Gohil; Annet Bluschke; Veit Roessner; Ann-Kathrin Stock; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Intergenerational associations in executive function between mothers and children in the context of risk.

Authors:  Matthew H Kim; Lisa Shimomaeda; Ryan J Giuliano; Elizabeth A Skowron
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-07-28

3.  Training voluntary motor suppression with real-time feedback of motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  D S Adnan Majid; Christina Lewis; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Perceptual Surprise Improves Action Stopping by Nonselectively Suppressing Motor Activity via a Neural Mechanism for Motor Inhibition.

Authors:  Isabella C Dutra; Darcy A Waller; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Research on Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Implications for the Bilingual Advantage Hypothesis.

Authors:  Naomi P Friedman
Journal:  Linguist Approaches Biling       Date:  2016-05-10

6.  A developmental window into trade-offs in executive function: the case of task switching versus response inhibition in 6-year-olds.

Authors:  Katharine A Blackwell; Christopher H Chatham; Melody Wiseheart; Yuko Munakata
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The temporal dynamic of response inhibition in early childhood: an ERP study of partial and successful inhibition.

Authors:  Nicolas Chevalier; Kathleen M Kelsey; Sandra A Wiebe; Kimberly Andrews Espy
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  Using language to get ready: Familiar labels help children engage proactive control.

Authors:  Sabine Doebel; John P Dickerson; Jerome D Hoover; Yuko Munakata
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-09-14

9.  Time Isn't of the Essence: Activating Goals Rather Than Imposing Delays Improves Inhibitory Control in Children.

Authors:  Jane E Barker; Yuko Munakata
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-11-05

Review 10.  Demystifying cognitive flexibility: Implications for clinical and developmental neuroscience.

Authors:  Dina R Dajani; Lucina Q Uddin
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 13.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.