AIMS: β-Lapachone (β-lap), a novel radiosensitizer with potent antitumor efficacy alone, selectively kills solid cancers that over-express NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1). Since breast or other solid cancers have heterogeneous NQO1 expression, therapies that reduce the resistance (e.g., NQO1(low)) of tumor cells will have significant clinical advantages. We tested whether NQO1-proficient (NQO1(+)) cells generated sufficient hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) after β-lap treatment to elicit bystander effects, DNA damage, and cell death in neighboring NQO1(low) cells. RESULTS: β-Lap showed NQO1-dependent efficacy against two triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) xenografts. NQO1 expression variations in human breast cancer patient samples were noted, where ~60% cancers over-expressed NQO1, with little or no expression in associated normal tissue. Differential DNA damage and lethality were noted in NQO1(+) versus NQO1-deficient (NQO1(-)) TNBC cells and xenografts after β-lap treatment. β-Lap-treated NQO1(+) cells died by programmed necrosis, whereas co-cultured NQO1(-) TNBC cells exhibited DNA damage and caspase-dependent apoptosis. NQO1 inhibition (dicoumarol) or H2O2 scavenging (catalase [CAT]) blocked all responses. Only NQO1(-) cells neighboring NQO1(+) TNBC cells responded to β-lap in vitro, and bystander effects correlated well with H2O2 diffusion. Bystander effects in NQO1(-) cells in vivo within mixed 50:50 co-cultured xenografts were dramatic and depended on NQO1(+) cells. However, normal human cells in vitro or in vivo did not show bystander effects, due to elevated endogenous CAT levels. Innovation and Conclusions: NQO1-dependent bystander effects elicited by NQO1 bioactivatable drugs (β-lap or deoxynyboquinone [DNQ]) likely contribute to their efficacies, killing NQO1(+) solid cancer cells and eliminating surrounding heterogeneous NQO1(low) cancer cells. Normal cells/tissue are protected by low NQO1:CAT ratios.
AIMS: β-Lapachone (β-lap), a novel radiosensitizer with potent antitumor efficacy alone, selectively kills solid cancers that over-express NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1). Since breast or other solid cancers have heterogeneous NQO1 expression, therapies that reduce the resistance (e.g., NQO1(low)) of tumor cells will have significant clinical advantages. We tested whether NQO1-proficient (NQO1(+)) cells generated sufficient hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) after β-lap treatment to elicit bystander effects, DNA damage, and cell death in neighboring NQO1(low) cells. RESULTS: β-Lap showed NQO1-dependent efficacy against two triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) xenografts. NQO1 expression variations in human breast cancer patient samples were noted, where ~60% cancers over-expressed NQO1, with little or no expression in associated normal tissue. Differential DNA damage and lethality were noted in NQO1(+) versus NQO1-deficient (NQO1(-)) TNBC cells and xenografts after β-lap treatment. β-Lap-treated NQO1(+) cells died by programmed necrosis, whereas co-cultured NQO1(-) TNBC cells exhibited DNA damage and caspase-dependent apoptosis. NQO1 inhibition (dicoumarol) or H2O2 scavenging (catalase [CAT]) blocked all responses. Only NQO1(-) cells neighboring NQO1(+) TNBC cells responded to β-lap in vitro, and bystander effects correlated well with H2O2 diffusion. Bystander effects in NQO1(-) cells in vivo within mixed 50:50 co-cultured xenografts were dramatic and depended on NQO1(+) cells. However, normal human cells in vitro or in vivo did not show bystander effects, due to elevated endogenous CAT levels. Innovation and Conclusions: NQO1-dependent bystander effects elicited by NQO1 bioactivatable drugs (β-lap or deoxynyboquinone [DNQ]) likely contribute to their efficacies, killing NQO1(+) solid cancer cells and eliminating surrounding heterogeneous NQO1(low) cancer cells. Normal cells/tissue are protected by low NQO1:CAT ratios.
Authors: Long Shan Li; Erik A Bey; Ying Dong; Jieru Meng; Biswanath Patra; Jingsheng Yan; Xian-Jin Xie; Rolf A Brekken; Carlton C Barnett; William G Bornmann; Jinming Gao; David A Boothman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: S M Freeman; C N Abboud; K A Whartenby; C H Packman; D S Koeplin; F L Moolten; G N Abraham Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1993-11-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: A Marín; A López de Cerain; E Hamilton; A D Lewis; J M Martinez-Peñuela; M A Idoate; J Bello Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1997 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Erik A Bey; Melissa S Bentle; Kathryn E Reinicke; Ying Dong; Chin-Rang Yang; Luc Girard; John D Minna; William G Bornmann; Jinming Gao; David A Boothman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-07-03 Impact factor: 12.779
Authors: Ying Dong; Shook-Fong Chin; Elvin Blanco; Erik A Bey; Wareef Kabbani; Xian-Jin Xie; William G Bornmann; David A Boothman; Jinming Gao Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Xiaofei Chen; Jade Mims; Xiumei Huang; Naveen Singh; Edward Motea; Sarah M Planchon; Muhammad Beg; Allen W Tsang; Mercedes Porosnicu; Melissa L Kemp; David A Boothman; Cristina M Furdui Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2017-12-20 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Stephanie P Totten; Young Kyuen Im; Eduardo Cepeda Cañedo; Ouafa Najyb; Alice Nguyen; Steven Hébert; Ryuhjin Ahn; Kyle Lewis; Benjamin Lebeau; Rachel La Selva; Valérie Sabourin; Constanza Martínez; Paul Savage; Hellen Kuasne; Daina Avizonis; Nancy Santos Martínez; Catherine Chabot; Adriana Aguilar-Mahecha; Marie-Line Goulet; Matthew Dankner; Michael Witcher; Kevin Petrecca; Mark Basik; Michael Pollak; Ivan Topisirovic; Rongtuan Lin; Peter M Siegel; Claudia L Kleinman; Morag Park; Julie St-Pierre; Josie Ursini-Siegel Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-06-03 Impact factor: 17.694
Authors: Dimithree Kahanda; Gaurab Chakrabarti; Marc A Mcwilliams; David A Boothman; Jason D Slinker Journal: Biosens Bioelectron Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 12.545
Authors: Molly A Silvers; Stanislaw Deja; Naveen Singh; Robert A Egnatchik; Jessica Sudderth; Xiuquan Luo; Muhammad S Beg; Shawn C Burgess; Ralph J DeBerardinis; David A Boothman; Matthew E Merritt Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 5.486
Authors: Xiumei Huang; Edward A Motea; Zachary R Moore; Jun Yao; Ying Dong; Gaurab Chakrabarti; Jessica A Kilgore; Molly A Silvers; Praveen L Patidar; Agnieszka Cholka; Farjana Fattah; Yoonjeong Cha; Glenda G Anderson; Rebecca Kusko; Michael Peyton; Jingsheng Yan; Xian-Jin Xie; Venetia Sarode; Noelle S Williams; John D Minna; Muhammad Beg; David E Gerber; Erik A Bey; David A Boothman Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2016-12-12 Impact factor: 38.585
Authors: Long-Shan Li; Srilakshmi Reddy; Zhen-Hua Lin; Shuangping Liu; Hyunsil Park; Stephen G Chun; William G Bornmann; Joel Thibodeaux; Jingsheng Yan; Gaurab Chakrabarti; Xian-Jin Xie; Baran D Sumer; David A Boothman; John S Yordy Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 6.009
Authors: Eduardo H G da Cruz; Molly A Silvers; Guilherme A M Jardim; Jarbas M Resende; Bruno C Cavalcanti; Igor S Bomfim; Claudia Pessoa; Carlos A de Simone; Giancarlo V Botteselle; Antonio L Braga; Divya K Nair; Irishi N N Namboothiri; David A Boothman; Eufrânio N da Silva Júnior Journal: Eur J Med Chem Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 6.514