Yinjian Zhou1,2, Ying Dong3, Gang Huang2, Yiguang Wang2, Xiaonan Huang2, Fayun Zhang1, David A Boothman3, Jinming Gao2, Wei Liang1. 1. Protein and Peptide Pharmaceutical Laboratory, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Pharmacology, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, Texas 75390. 3. Laboratory of Molecular Stresses, Departments of Pharmacology and Radiation Oncology, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 6001 Forest Park Drive, ND2.210K Texas 75390-8807.
Abstract
β-Lapachone (β-lap), a novel anticancer agent, is bioactivated by NADP(H):quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), an enzyme over-expressed in numerous tumors, including lung, pancreas, breast, and prostate cancers. Fast renal clearance and methemaglobinemia / hemolytic side-effects from the clinical formulation (β-lap-hydroxyl propyl-β-cyclodextrin complex) hindered its clinical translation. Here, we investigated a dual model pH responsive polymers for β-lap delivery. Three pH-sensitive linkages, including acylhydrazone, ketal and imine bonds for β-lap prodrug syntheses result in an aryl imine linkage the most optimal linkage. The conversion to β-lap was 2.8%, 4.5% and 100% at pH 7.4, 6.5 and 5.0 in 8 h, respectively. β-lap aryl imine prodrug conjugated ultra pH-sensitive (UPS) polymer reached high β-lap loading density (8.3%) and exhibited dual-stages responsiveness to pH variation. In pHs under pHt, at stage I, micelle immediately dissociation and subsequently entering stage II, micelles start quickly release β-lap. In vitro release study showed that the micelles constantly release β-lap (14.9 ± 0.1%) at pHs above pHt in 72 h, whereas boosted release of β-lap (79.4 ± 1.2%) at pH 5.0. Micelle intracellular distribution predominantly in the lysosome organelle guaranteed their pH responsive dissociation and subsequently β-lap controlled release. The M-P micelles retained NQO1-dependent cytotoxicity in A549 lung cancer cells, similar to free drug in both efficacy and mechanism of cell death. The lysosome-oriented dual-stage ultra pH responsive β-lap prodrug micelles potentially offer an alternative nanotherapeutic strategy for lung, as well as other NQO1+ cancer therapies.
β-Lapachone (β-n class="Gene">lap), a novel anticancer agent, is bioactivated by NADP(H):quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), an enzyme over-expressed in numerous tumors, including lung, pancreas, breast, and prostate cancers. Fast renal clearance and methemaglobinemia / hemolytic side-effects from the clinical formulation (β-lap-hydroxyl propyl-β-cyclodextrin complex) hindered its clinical translation. Here, we investigated a dual model pH responsive polymers for β-lap delivery. Three pH-sensitive linkages, including acylhydrazone, ketal and imine bonds for β-lap prodrug syntheses result in an aryl imine linkage the most optimal linkage. The conversion to β-lap was 2.8%, 4.5% and 100% at pH 7.4, 6.5 and 5.0 in 8 h, respectively. β-laparyl imine prodrug conjugated ultra pH-sensitive (UPS) polymer reached high β-lap loading density (8.3%) and exhibited dual-stages responsiveness to pH variation. In pHs under pHt, at stage I, micelle immediately dissociation and subsequently entering stage II, micelles start quickly release β-lap. In vitro release study showed that the micelles constantly release β-lap (14.9 ± 0.1%) at pHs above pHt in 72 h, whereas boosted release of β-lap (79.4 ± 1.2%) at pH 5.0. Micelle intracellular distribution predominantly in the lysosome organelle guaranteed their pH responsive dissociation and subsequently β-lap controlled release. The M-P micelles retained NQO1-dependent cytotoxicity in A549 lung cancer cells, similar to free drug in both efficacy and mechanism of cell death. The lysosome-oriented dual-stage ultra pH responsive β-lap prodrug micelles potentially offer an alternative nanotherapeutic strategy for lung, as well as other NQO1+ cancer therapies.
Authors: Aaron P Griset; Joseph Walpole; Rong Liu; Ann Gaffey; Yolonda L Colson; Mark W Grinstaff Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2009-02-25 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Erik A Bey; Melissa S Bentle; Kathryn E Reinicke; Ying Dong; Chin-Rang Yang; Luc Girard; John D Minna; William G Bornmann; Jinming Gao; David A Boothman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-07-03 Impact factor: 12.779
Authors: Norased Nasongkla; Andy F Wiedmann; Andrew Bruening; Meghan Beman; Dale Ray; William G Bornmann; David A Boothman; Jinming Gao Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.580
Authors: Lifen Cao; Long Shan Li; Christopher Spruell; Ling Xiao; Gaurab Chakrabarti; Erik A Bey; Kathryn E Reinicke; Melissa C Srougi; Zachary Moore; Ying Dong; Peggy Vo; Wareef Kabbani; Chin-Rang Yang; Xiaoyu Wang; Farjana Fattah; Julio C Morales; Edward A Motea; William G Bornmann; John S Yordy; David A Boothman Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 7.468
Authors: Claudio D Navo; Julie Becher; Enrique Gil de Montes; Ana Guerreiro; Lavinia Dunsmore; Emily Hoyt; Libby Brown; Viviane Zelenay; Sigitas Mikutis; Jonathan Cooper; Isaia Barbieri; Stefanie Lawrinowitz; Elise Siouve; Esther Martin; Pedro R Ruivo; Tiago Rodrigues; Filipa P da Cruz; Oliver Werz; George Vassiliou; Peter Ravn; Gonzalo Jiménez-Osés; Gonçalo J L Bernardes Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 24.274