| Literature DB >> 24511321 |
Muhammad Tauseef Sultan1, Masood Sadiq Butt2, Roselina Karim1, M Zia-Ul-Haq3, Rizwana Batool2, Shakeel Ahmad4, Luigi Aliberti5, Vincenzo De Feo5.
Abstract
In the recent era, diabetes mellitus has emerged as one of the significant threats to public health and this situation demands the attention of the researchers and allied stakeholders. Dietary regimens using functional and nutraceutical foods are gaining wide range of acceptance and some traditional medicinal plants are of considerable importance. The main objective of this instant study was to explore the antidiabetic potential of Nigella sativa fixed oil (NSFO) and essential oil (NSEO). Three experimental groups of rats received diets during the entire study duration, that is, D1 (control), D2 (NSFO: 4.0%), and D3 (NSEO: 0.30%). Experimental diets (NSFO & NSEO) modulated the lipid profile, while decreasing the antioxidant damage. However, production of free radicals, that is, MDA, and conjugated dienes increased by 59.00 and 33.63%, respectively, in control. On the contrary, NSFO and NSEO reduced the MDA levels by 11.54 and 26.86% and the conjugated dienes levels by 32.53 and 38.39%, respectively. N. sativa oils improved the health and showed some promising anti-diabetic results.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24511321 PMCID: PMC3910438 DOI: 10.1155/2014/826380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Diet plan used in the study.
| Diets | |
|---|---|
| Group-I | D1: (control/placebo diet) |
| Group-II | D2: (4.0% fixed oil) |
| Group-III | D3: (0.3% essential oil) |
Figure 1Feed and water intake and body weight of diabetic rats. D1 (control), D2 (NSFO), and D3 (NSEO).
Effects of diets containing NSFO and NSEO on blood glucose and insulin levels in diabetic rats.
| Parameters | Diets | Study intervals (days) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 28 | 56 | ||
| Glucose | D1 (control) | 211.78 ± 12.22c | 241.67 ± 7.83b | 282.10 ± 8.20a |
| D2 (NSFO) | 217.41 ± 9.09c | 214.28 ± 7.20c | 208.50 ± 9.18c | |
| D3 (NSEO) | 210.47 ± 8.01c | 195.36 ± 9.51d | 188.94 ± 8.39e | |
|
| ||||
| Insulin | D1 (control) | 42.11 ± 1.35b | 32.07 ± 1.04d | 20.33 ± 0.59e |
| D2 (NSFO) | 40.35 ± 1.03bc | 38.68 ± 0.70c | 42.62 ± 0.89b | |
| D3 (NSEO) | 42.38 ± 0.52b | 45.44 ± 1.34a | 46.80 ± 2.08a | |
Means sharing same letters in a column/row do not differ significantly at P < 0.05.
Effects of diets containing NSFO and NSEO on cholesterol, HDL, LDL, and triglycerides levels in diabetic rats.
| Parameters | Diets | Study intervals (days) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 28 | 56 | ||
| Cholesterol | D1 (control) | 106.56 ± 3.42de | 130.37 ± 4.22b | 147.76 ± 4.30a |
| D2 (NSFO) | 110.36 ± 2.81cd | 108.90 ± 1.98cd | 98.97 ± 2.08e | |
| D3 (NSEO) | 116.31 ± 1.42c | 113.92 ± 3.36c | 105.97 ± 4.70de | |
|
| ||||
| HDL | D1 (control) | 38.36 ± 2.21 | 36.79 ± 1.19 | 37.40 ± 1.90 |
| D2 (NSFO) | 40.45 ± 1.69 | 42.46 ± 1.43 | 42.68 ± 1.88 | |
| D3 (NSEO) | 39.08 ± 1.49 | 41.79 ± 2.03 | 41.82 ± 1.86 | |
|
| ||||
| LDL | D1 (control) | 47.71 ± 2.75d | 72.79 ± 2.36b | 83.41 ± 4.23a |
| D2 (NSFO) | 51.13 ± 2.14c | 48.54 ± 1.63d | 38.99 ± 1.72e | |
| D3 (NSEO) | 57.44 ± 2.19c | 53.20 ± 2.59c | 46.02 ± 2.04d | |
|
| ||||
| Triglycerides | D1 (control) | 102.45 ± 5.91b | 103.96 ± 3.37b | 130.34 ± 6.61a |
| D2 (NSFO) | 93.89 ± 3.93d | 89.50 ± 3.01e | 86.48 ± 3.81e | |
| D3 (NSEO) | 98.94 ± 3.77c | 94.64 ± 4.61d | 93.67 ± 4.16d | |
Means sharing same letters in a column/row do not differ significantly at P < 0.05.
Indices of antioxidants damage in diabetic rats treated with NSFO and NSEO.
| Parameters | Diets | Study intervals (days) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 28 | 56 | ||
| Total antioxidants | D1 (control) | 0.52 ± 0.03de | 0.44 ± 0.01e | 0.29 ± 0.02f |
| D2 (NSFO) | 0.56 ± 0.02d | 0.65 ± 0.02c | 0.78 ± 0.03b | |
| D3 (NSEO) | 0.47 ± 0.02de | 0.67 ± 0.03c | 0.91 ± 0.04a | |
|
| ||||
| MDA | D1 (control) | 6.61 ± 0.38c | 9.02 ± 0.29b | 10.51 ± 0.53a |
| D2 (NSFO) | 7.00 ± 0.29c | 5.86 ± 0.20d | 4.89 ± 0.21e | |
| D3 (NSEO) | 7.06 ± 0.27c | 3.66 ± 0.18f | 3.28 ± 0.15f | |
|
| ||||
| Conjugated dienes (CD) | D1 (control) | 2.25 ± 0.13c | 2.63 ± 0.08b | 3.01 ± 0.15a |
| D2 (NSFO) | 2.08 ± 0.09c | 1.90 ± 0.06cd | 1.84 ± 0.08d | |
| D3 (NSEO) | 2.08 ± 0.08c | 1.58 ± 0.08e | 1.41 ± 0.061e | |
Means sharing same letters in a column/row do not differ significantly at P < 0.05.
Correlation matrix of some important parameters in diabetic rats.
| Chl | HDL | TG | LDL | Gl. | Insulin | MDA | TAC | CD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chl | 1.00 | ||||||||
| HDL | −0.82** | 1.00 | |||||||
| TG | 0.94** | −0.80* | 1.00 | ||||||
| LDL | 0.99** | −0.87** | 0.90** | 1.00 | |||||
| Gl | 0.93** | −0.75* | 0.89** | 0.92** | 1.00 | ||||
| Insulin | −0.57ns | 0.27ns | −0.65ns | −0.50ns | −0.74* | 1.00 | |||
| MDA | 0.74* | −0.69ns | 0.78* | 0.73* | 0.86** | −0.72* | 1.00 | ||
| TAC | −0.68ns | 0.66ns | −0.70* | −0.68ns | −0.77* | 0.69ns | −0.96** | 1.00 | |
| CD | 0.86** | −0.72* | 0.87** | 0.83** | 0.96** | −0.79** | 0.94** | −0.86** | 1.00 |
*Significant (P < 0.05); **highly significant (P < 0.01); and ns: non-significant.
Chl: cholesterol; HDL: high density lipoprotein; TG: triglycerides; LDL: low density lipoprotein; Gl: glucose; MDA: malonaldehyde; TAC: total antioxidant capacity; CD: conjugated dienes.