| Literature DB >> 24510395 |
Abstract
Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures are serious injuries to a major weight-bearing joint. These injuries are often associated with severe soft tissue injuries that complicate surgical management. We reviewed 54 consecutive patients who sustained bicondylar tibial plateau fractures that were treated with limited open reduction and cannulated screw fixation combined with fine-wire circular external fixation. Forty-six patients met the inclusion criteria of this retrospective review. Eight patients were excluded because they did not complete a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Thirty-six patients had Schatzker type-VI, and ten patients had Schatzker type-V fractures. All fractures were united without loss of reduction; there were no incidences of wound complications, osteomyelitis or septic arthritis. The average Knee Society Clinical Rating Score was 81.6, translating to good clinical results. Minor pin track infection was the most common complication encountered. This review concludes that fine-wire circular external fixation, combined with limited open reduction and cannulated screw fixation, consistently produces good functional results without serious complications.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24510395 PMCID: PMC3951617 DOI: 10.1007/s11751-014-0185-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr ISSN: 1828-8928
Patient demographics
| Age/gender | Mechanism of injury | Schatzker | Soft tissue injury | Additional injuries | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tscherne | Gustilo–Anderson | |||||
| 1. | 38 M | Pedestrian accident | VI | IIIB | ||
| 2. | 43 F | Motor vehicle accident | VI | III | ||
| 3. | 29 M | Pedestrian accident | VI | III | Contralateral tibial plateau fracture | |
| 4. | 34 M | Motor vehicle accident | VI | IIIA | ||
| 5. | 40 F | Fall | VI | III | ||
| 6. | 57 M | Pedestrian accident | VI | III | ||
| 7. | 59 F | Pedestrian accident | VI | II | Femur fracture | |
| 8. | 19 M | Pedestrian accident | VI | IIIB | Femur fracture | |
| 9. | 56 F | Motor vehicle accident | VI | III | ||
| 10. | 42 M | Fall | VI | III | ||
| 11. | 37 M | Fall | VI | III | ||
| 12. | 21 F | Motor vehicle accident | V | III | Contralateral tibia fracture | |
| 13. | 51 F | Motor vehicle accident | VI | III | Acetabulum fracture, Monteggia fracture | |
| 14. | 50 M | Motor vehicle accident | VI | III | ||
| 15. | 40 M | Assault | V | II | ||
| 16. | 50 M | Motor vehicle accident | V | II | ||
| 17. | 52 M | Pedestrian accident | VI | III | ||
| 18. | 26 M | Motor vehicle accident | VI | III | Bilateral femur fracture | |
| 19. | 27 M | Motor vehicle accident | V | II | ||
| 20. | 59 M | Motor vehicle accident | VI | III | ||
| 21 | 41 F | Fall | V | III | ||
| 22. | 46 M | Fall | VI | III | ||
| 23. | 34 M | Fall | VI | III | ||
| 24. | 43 F | Fall | VI | III | Clavicle fracture | |
| 25. | 57 M | Motor vehicle accident | VI | II | Bilateral plateau fracture | |
| 26. | 57 M | Motor vehicle accident | VI | II | Bilateral plateau fracture | |
| 27. | 45 M | Motor vehicle accident | VI | IIIA | ||
| 28. | 36 M | Fall | VI | III | ||
| 29. | 53 M | Bicycle accident | VI | III | ||
| 30. | 43 M | Pedestrian accident | VI | III | ||
| 31. | 24 F | Fall | V | II | ||
| 32. | 37 M | Motor vehicle accident | V | I | ||
| 33. | 28 F | Pedestrian accident | VI | II | ||
| 34. | 33 M | Fall | VI | III | Intercondylar femur fracture | |
| 35. | 26 F | Fall | V | I | ||
| 36. | 51 M | Pedestrian accident | VI | III | ||
| 37. | 52 F | Fall | VI | III | ||
| 38. | 47 M | Motor vehicle accident | VI | IIIA | ||
| 39. | 41 M | Fall | V | I | ||
| 40. | 52 F | Fall | VI | III | ||
| 41. | 52 M | Pedestrian accident | VI | III | ||
| 42. | 68 F | Motor vehicle accident | VI | III | ||
| 43. | 37 F | Fall | V | III | ||
| 44. | 56 F | Fall | VI | III | ||
| 45. | 48 M | Motor vehicle accident | VI | III | Femur, tibia, tibial pilon fracture | |
| 46. | 41 F | Pedestrian accident | VI | II | ||
Management and complications
| Co-morbidities | Fixator | Time to union (weeks) | Complications | Follow-up (months) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | None | Ilizarov | 34 | Meta-diaphyseal non-union | 18 |
| 2. | None | Ilizarov | 14 | None | 24 |
| 3. | None | Ilizarov | 18 | None | 24 |
| 4. | None | Ilizarov | 20 | Compartment syndrome | 15 |
| 5. | None | Ilizarov | 16 | Pin tract sepsis C&O II | 12 |
| 6. | None | Ilizarov | 17 | Pin tract sepsis C&O II | 12 |
| 7. | None | Ilizarov | 28 | None | 12 |
| 8. | None | Ilizarov | 22 | None | 21 |
| 9. | None | Ilizarov | 26 | Pin tract sepsis C&O II | 13 |
| 10. | None | Ilizarov | 20 | Pin tract sepsis C&O II | 12 |
| 11. | None | Ilizarov | 20 | None | 12 |
| 12. | None | Ilizarov | 16 | None | 13 |
| 13. | None | Ilizarov | 19 | None | 14 |
| 14. | None | Ilizarov | 16 | None | 12 |
| 15. | None | Truelok | 14 | Pin tract sepsis C&O II | 13 |
| 16. | Smoker | Ilizarov | 12 | Pin tract sepsis C&O IV | 12 |
| 17. | None | Ilizarov | 18 | None | 17 |
| 18. | HIV positive (CD4 = 360) | Truelok | 54 | Meta-diaphyseal delayed union | 25 |
| 19. | None | Ilizarov | 16 | None | 15 |
| 20. | None | Ilizarov | 10 | None | 13 |
| 21 | None | Truelok | 21 | None | 14 |
| 22. | HIV positive (CD4 = 352) | Ilizarov | 20 | None | 12 |
| 23. | None | Ilizarov | 13 | Compartment syndrome | 24 |
| 24. | None | Ilizarov | 19 | None | 15 |
| 25. | Diabetes mellitus | Truelok | 13 | None | 24 |
| 26. | Diabetes mellitus | Truelok | 13 | None | 24 |
| 27. | Smoker | Ilizarov | 19 | Pin tract sepsis C&O III | 15 |
| 28. | HIV positive (CD4 = 309) | Ilizarov | 15 | None | 14 |
| 29. | None | Truelok | 18 | Pin tract sepsis C&O II | 18 |
| 30. | None | Truelok | 17 | None | 12 |
| 31. | None | Ilizarov | 19 | None | 12 |
| 32. | None | Ilizarov | 18 | None | 13 |
| 33. | RVD positive (CD4 = 314) | Truelok | 15 | None | 14 |
| 34. | None | Truelok | 16 | None | 13 |
| 35. | None | Ilizarov | 9 | None | 12 |
| 36. | HIV positive (CD4 = 612) | Truelok | 10 | None | 17 |
| 37. | Smoker | Truelok | 16 | Pin tract sepsis C&O II | 13 |
| 38. | None | Truelok | 16 | None | 12 |
| 39. | Smoker | Ilizarov | 19 | Pin tract sepsis C&O II | 12 |
| 40. | Smoker | Ilizarov | 17 | Pin tract sepsis C&O II | 12 |
| 41. | None | Truelok | 16 | None | 13 |
| 42. | None | Truelok | 14 | None | 12 |
| 43. | HIV positive (CD4 = 407) | Truelok | 16 | None | 13 |
| 44. | None | Truelok | 15 | None | 13 |
| 45. | HIV positive (CD4 = 347) | Ilizarov | 21 | None | 14 |
| 46. | Smoker | Ilizarov | 30 | None | 12 |
Fig. 152-year-old female with bicondylar tibial plateau fracture
Fig. 2Four ring frame designing with spread along entire length of tibia
Fig. 3Post-operative radiograph showing limited internal fixation and circular external fixator
Knee Society Clinical Rating Scale
| Knee score | Functional score | Rating scale | Grade | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 85 | 90 | 87.5 | Excellent |
| 2. | 65 | 55 | 60 | Fair |
| 3. | 94 | 100 | 97 | Excellent |
| 4. | 83 | 85 | 84 | Good |
| 5. | 90 | 90 | 90 | Excellent |
| 6. | 81 | 100 | 91 | Excellent |
| 7. | 88 | 75 | 81.5 | Good |
| 8. | 100 | 100 | 100 | Excellent |
| 9. | 78 | 55 | 66.5 | Fair |
| 10. | 90 | 90 | 90 | Excellent |
| 11. | 80 | 45 | 62.5 | Fair |
| 12. | 99 | 90 | 94.5 | Excellent |
| 13. | 52 | 55 | 53.5 | Poor |
| 14. | 73 | 75 | 74 | Good |
| 15. | 80 | 85 | 82.5 | Good |
| 16. | 78 | 70 | 74 | Good |
| 17. | 88 | 70 | 79 | Good |
| 18. | 78 | 70 | 74 | Good |
| 19. | 95 | 100 | 97.5 | Excellent |
| 20. | 77 | 80 | 78.5 | Good |
| 21 | 69 | 45 | 57 | Poor |
| 22. | 92 | 80 | 86 | Excellent |
| 23. | 95 | 90 | 92.5 | Excellent |
| 24. | 93 | 90 | 91.5 | Excellent |
| 25. | 97 | 100 | 98.5 | Excellent |
| 26. | 99 | 100 | 99.5 | Excellent |
| 27. | 75 | 75 | 75 | Good |
| 28. | 83 | 80 | 81.5 | Good |
| 29. | 89 | 90 | 89.5 | Excellent |
| 30. | 90 | 80 | 85 | Excellent |
| 31. | 94 | 100 | 97 | Excellent |
| 32. | 75 | 80 | 77.5 | Good |
| 33. | 87 | 70 | 78.5 | Good |
| 34. | 83 | 84 | 83.5 | Good |
| 35. | 92 | 70 | 80.5 | Good |
| 36. | 97 | 90 | 93.5 | Excellent |
| 37. | 100 | 72 | 86 | Excellent |
| 38. | 94 | 100 | 97 | Excellent |
| 39. | 83 | 60 | 71.5 | Good |
| 40. | 90 | 90 | 90 | Excellent |
| 41. | 68 | 50 | 59 | Poor |
| 42. | 99 | 75 | 87 | Excellent |
| 43. | 90 | 80 | 85 | Excellent |
| 44. | 80 | 80 | 80 | Good |
| 45. | 67 | 30 | 48.5 | Poor |
| 46. | 73 | 55 | 64 | Fair |