Literature DB >> 24510076

The role of religious values in decisions about genetics and the public's health.

Stephen M Modell1, Toby Citrin, Susan B King, Sharon L R Kardia.   

Abstract

The latest health care legislation, which promotes prevention and health screening, ultimately depends for its success on recognition of people's values concerning the technologies being employed, not just the interventions' technical virtues. Values concerning the deterministic nature of a condition and what groups should be targeted rest on a sense of what is morally, often religiously right in a given health circumstance. This paper looks at a number of leading-edge case examples--breast cancer genetic screening and family decision-making, and newborn screening and biobanks--in examining how the choices made at the individual, family, and societal levels rest on faith in a higher source of efficacy and moral perspectives on the measures that can be taken. Qualitative responses expressing people's attitudes toward these technologies underscore the importance of considering faith-based values in individual decisions and collective policies on their use. These examples are considered in the context of the historic interplay between science and religion and recent definitions and models of health which incorporate physical, emotional, and social elements, and most importantly, are expanding to incorporate the religious and spiritual values domains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24510076     DOI: 10.1007/s10943-013-9814-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Relig Health        ISSN: 0022-4197


  11 in total

Review 1.  Solving the puzzle of socioeconomic status and health: the need for integrated, multilevel, interdisciplinary research.

Authors:  N B Anderson
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Toward a framework of mutualism: the Jewish community in genetics research.

Authors:  Karen H Rothenberg; Amy B Rutkin
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  1998

3.  Psycho-endocrine-immune response to mindfulness-based stress reduction in individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: a quasiexperimental study.

Authors:  F Patrick Robinson; Herbert L Mathews; Linda Witek-Janusek
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.579

4.  Preimplantation sex selection and genetic screening in contemporary Jewish law and ethics.

Authors:  R V Grazi; J B Wolowelsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  A qualitative exploration of the community partner experience in a faith-based breast cancer educational intervention.

Authors:  Elisa M Rodriguez; Janice V Bowie; Shannon Frattaroli; Andrea Gielen
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2009-03-23

Review 6.  Levels of analysis in health science. A framework for integrating sociobehavioral and biomedical research.

Authors:  N B Anderson
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  The Michigan BioTrust for Health: using dried bloodspots for research to benefit the community while respecting the individual.

Authors:  Denise Chrysler; Harry McGee; Janice Bach; Ed Goldman; Peter D Jacobson
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  Spiritual faith and genetic testing decisions among high-risk breast cancer probands.

Authors:  M D Schwartz; C Hughes; J Roth; D Main; B N Peshkin; C Isaacs; C Kavanagh; C Lerman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Michigan BioTrust for Health: public support for using residual dried blood spot samples for health research.

Authors:  D Duquette; C Langbo; J Bach; M Kleyn
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Community-based dialogue: engaging communities of color in the United states' genetics policy conversation.

Authors:  Vence L Bonham; Toby Citrin; Stephen M Modell; Tené Hamilton Franklin; Esther W B Bleicher; Leonard M Fleck
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.265

View more
  8 in total

1.  Self-reported race and ethnicity of US biobank participants compared to the US Census.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gross Cohn; Nalo Hamilton; Elaine L Larson; Janet K Williams
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-06-16

2.  Playing God? Religious Perspectives on Manipulating the Genome.

Authors:  V Kalidasan; Kumitaa Theva Das
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2022-01-13

Review 3.  Phase changes in the BRCA policy domain.

Authors:  Stephen M Modell; Susan B King; Toby Citrin; Sharon L R Kardia
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2014-06

Review 4.  Screening and vaccination as determined by the Social Ecological Model and the Theory of Triadic Influence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anayawa Nyambe; Guido Van Hal; Jarl K Kampen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Harmony Between Humanity and Nature: Natural Vs. Synthetic Drug Preference in Chinese Atheists and Taoists.

Authors:  Yu Cao; Heng Li
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2021-06-19

6.  Exploring Genetic Numeracy Skills in a Sample of U.S. University Students.

Authors:  Margo W Bergman; Patricia Goodson; Heather Honoré Goltz
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-08-29

7.  The good, the bad, and the utilitarian: attitudes towards genetic testing and implications for disability.

Authors:  Alexandra Maftei; Oana Dănilă
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-01-17

8.  Patient-Centered Obstetric Care in the Age of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Prenatal Screening.

Authors:  Patricia K Agatisa; Mary Beth Mercer; Ariane Mitchum; Marissa B Coleridge; Ruth M Farrell
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2017-08-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.