Literature DB >> 24599711

Phase changes in the BRCA policy domain.

Stephen M Modell1, Susan B King, Toby Citrin, Sharon L R Kardia.   

Abstract

The recent US Supreme Court ruling against gene patenting has been accompanied by the passage at the federal level of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, both events representing a thawing or phase change in policies that will now make preventive techniques, such as BRCA genetic testing to predict risk for familial breast and ovarian cancer, more affordable and accessible. Authors including Yun-Han Huang in this journal have noted the judicial ruling is one step--a significant one--in the process of patent system reform. This commentary links such changes with policy formation and action taken by members of diverse religious communities in the aftermath of the Human Genome Project and continuing in today's genome sequencing area. Religious engagement has acted as a catalyzing force for change in the creation and dissemination of genetic developments. Religious perspectives are needed to solve the new ethical dilemmas posed by population screening for BRCA mutations and the rise of direct-to-consumer and provider marketing of such genetic tests, which have far-reaching consequences at the individual, family, and societal levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24599711     DOI: 10.1007/s10943-014-9836-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Relig Health        ISSN: 0022-4197


  17 in total

1.  DNA patents and human dignity.

Authors:  D B Resnik
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Case report: genetic susceptibility testing for breast and ovarian cancer: a patient's perspective.

Authors:  N Prouser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Evidence and anecdotes: an analysis of human gene patenting controversies.

Authors:  Timothy Caulfield; Robert M Cook-Deegan; F Scott Kieff; John P Walsh
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Ashkenazi Jews and breast cancer: the consequences of linking ethnic identity to genetic disease.

Authors:  Sherry I Brandt-Rauf; Victoria H Raveis; Nathan F Drummond; Jill A Conte; Sheila M Rothman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Patenting gene sequences.

Authors:  A L Caplan; J Merz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-04-13

Review 7.  Gene patents: a broken incentives system.

Authors:  Yun-Han Huang
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2013-12

Review 8.  Founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.

Authors:  R Ferla; V Calò; S Cascio; G Rinaldi; G Badalamenti; I Carreca; E Surmacz; G Colucci; V Bazan; A Russo
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 9.  Ethical issues related to BRCA gene testing in orthodox Jewish women.

Authors:  Pnina Mor; Kathleen Oberle
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.874

10.  Pervasive sequence patents cover the entire human genome.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Rosenfeld; Christopher E Mason
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 11.117

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cancer Survivorship Care: An Opportunity to Revisit Cancer Genetics.

Authors:  Kathryn J Ruddy; Betsy C Risendal; Judy E Garber; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Systematic scoping review of the concept of 'genetic identity' and its relevance for germline modification.

Authors:  Floor M Goekoop; Carla G van El; Guy A M Widdershoven; Nadza Dzinalija; Martina C Cornel; Natalie Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.