Literature DB >> 30644524

Initial experience of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision in Singapore: a case series.

Ming Li Ho1, Cheryl Chong2, Shen Ann Yeo3, Chee Yung Ng4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is increasingly performed worldwide due to its multiple advantages over traditional open surgery. In the surgical treatment of right-sided colonic tumours, the latest technique is laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision (lapCME), which aims to lower the rate of local recurrence and maximise survival as compared to standard laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (lapS).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of our initial experience with lapCME in Singapore General Hospital between 2012 and 2015. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon.
RESULTS: Nine patients underwent lapCME and 16 patients underwent lapS. Indication for lapCME was cancer in the right colon. None of the patients required conversion to open surgery, and all were discharged well. The number of lymph nodes resected in the lapCME group was significantly greater than in the lapS group (29 ± 15 vs. 19 ± 6; p = 0.02) during the study period, and the mean operation time was significantly longer for lapCME (237 ± 50 minutes vs. 156 ± 46 minutes; p = 0.0005). There were no statistically significant differences in terms of demographics, tumour stage, time taken for bowel to open postoperatively, time taken for patient to resume a solid diet postoperatively and length of hospital stay. Two patients who underwent lapS were re-admitted for intra-abdominal collections - one patient required radiology-guided drainage, while the other patient was managed conservatively.
CONCLUSION: Our initial experience with lapCME confirms the feasibility and safety of the procedure. Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  central vascular ligation; colon cancer; complete mesocolic excision; laparoscopic right hemicolectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30644524      PMCID: PMC6535448          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2019008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  42 in total

1.  Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands.

Authors:  E Kapiteijn; H Putter; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  A case-control study of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy vs. open right hemicolectomy.

Authors:  Richard P Baker; Liviu V Titu; John E Hartley; Peter W R Lee; John R T Monson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Skip metastases in colon cancer: assessment by lymph node mapping using molecular detection.

Authors:  A E Merrie; L V Phillips; K Yun; J L McCall
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma.

Authors:  Min-Hua Zheng; Bo Feng; Ai-Guo Lu; Jian-Wen Li; Ming-Liang Wang; Zhi-Hai Mao; Yan-Yan Hu; Feng Dong; Wei-Guo Hu; Dong-Hua Li; Lu Zang; Yuan-Fei Peng; Bao-Ming Yu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project.

Authors:  A L Martling; T Holm; L E Rutqvist; B J Moran; R J Heald; B Cedemark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer.

Authors:  E L Bokey; P H Chapuis; O F Dent; B J Mander; I P Bissett; R C Newland
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Juan C García-Valdecasas; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Pilar Taurá; Josep M Piqué; Josep Visa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer--implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit.

Authors:  Arne Wibe; Bjørn Møller; Jarle Norstein; Erik Carlsen; Johan N Wiig; Richard J Heald; Frøydis Langmark; Helge E Myrvold; Odd Søreide
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision is safe, leads to an increased lymph node yield and to increased survival: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  G Anania; R J Davies; F Bagolini; N Vettoretto; J Randolph; R Cirocchi; A Donini
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) is a safe and feasible option for right colonic cancers: short and midterm results from a single-centre experience.

Authors:  Najaf Siddiqi; Samuel Stefan; Ravish Jootun; Ioannis Mykoniatis; Karen Flashman; Richard Beable; Gerald David; Jim Khan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.