Literature DB >> 27358515

Epidermal Sutureless Closure of the Umbilical Base Following Laparoscopic Colectomy for Colon Cancer.

Susumu Shibasaki1, Shigenori Homma1, Tadashi Yoshida1, Hideki Kawamura1, Norihiko Takahashi1, Akinobu Taketomi1.   

Abstract

At our institute, a non-suturing method for closure of the umbilical epidermis has been used in laparoscopic colorectal resection to prevent umbilical wound infection. We performed a retrospective evaluation of the incidence of umbilical wound infection using this technique for patients with colorectal cancer. From 2010 to 2014, 178 consecutive patients underwent elective laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. The umbilical fascia was closed using interrupted multifilament absorbable sutures. The skin surface of the umbilicus was compressed using a cotton ball and sealed by water vapor-permeable film. Three (1.7 %) patients required conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. The mean surgery time was 174 ± 48 min, intraoperative blood loss was 29 ± 75 mL, and postoperative hospital stay was 10.5 ± 6.7 days. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, umbilical superficial wound infection occurred in two (1.1 %) patients. The two patients recovered from their wound infections after a few days of drainage, and their hospital discharge was not delayed. Deep umbilical wound infection did not occur in any patient. Our non-suturing closure technique appeared to be effective in preventing wound infection after laparoscopic resection of colon cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Laparoscopic colorectal resection; Surgical site infection; Umbilical wound infection

Year:  2015        PMID: 27358515      PMCID: PMC4907909          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-015-1347-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  25 in total

1.  Surgical site infection rates in laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Rahim Aimaq; Gabriel Akopian; Howard S Kaufman
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Toshiaki Watanabe; Michio Itabashi; Yasuhiro Shimada; Shinji Tanaka; Yoshinori Ito; Yoichi Ajioka; Tetsuya Hamaguchi; Ichinosuke Hyodo; Masahiro Igarashi; Hideyuki Ishida; Megumi Ishiguro; Yukihide Kanemitsu; Norihiro Kokudo; Kei Muro; Atsushi Ochiai; Masahiko Oguchi; Yasuo Ohkura; Yutaka Saito; Yoshiharu Sakai; Hideki Ueno; Takayuki Yoshino; Takahiro Fujimori; Nobuo Koinuma; Takayuki Morita; Genichi Nishimura; Yuh Sakata; Keiichi Takahashi; Hiroya Takiuchi; Osamu Tsuruta; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Masahiro Yoshida; Naohiko Yamaguchi; Kenjiro Kotake; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese and nonobese patients: a case-matched study of 180 patients.

Authors:  Sandrine Kamoun; Arnaud Alves; Frédéric Bretagnol; Jeremy H Lefevre; Patrice Valleur; Yves Panis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Laparoscopy decreases postoperative complication rates after abdominal colectomy: results from the national surgical quality improvement program.

Authors:  Gregory D Kennedy; Charles Heise; Victoria Rajamanickam; Bruce Harms; Eugene F Foley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Comparison of single-incision plus one additional port laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection with conventional laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Futoshi Kawamata; Shigenori Homma; Nozomi Minagawa; Hideki Kawamura; Norihiko Takahashi; Akinobu Taketomi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 8.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence.

Authors:  Emad H Aly
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2009.

Authors:  Celeste Y Kang; Obaid O Chaudhry; Wissam J Halabi; Vinh Nguyen; Joseph C Carmichael; Michael J Stamos; Steven Mills
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Wound infection after elective laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Seiichiro Yamamoto; Shin Fujita; Takayuki Akasu; Seiji Ishiguro; Yutaka Kobayashi; Yoshihiro Moriya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  1 in total

1.  Preoperative Elemental Diet before Laparoscopic Anterior Resection in Patients with Advanced Stenotic Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Tadashi Yoshida; Shigenori Homma; Nobuki Ichikawa; Hiroaki Iijima; Akinobu Taketomi
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2021-10-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.