Literature DB >> 24508704

Inconsistent outcomes of transcranial direct current stimulation may originate from anatomical differences among individuals: electric field simulation using individual MRI data.

Jung-Hoon Kim1, Do-Won Kim1, Won Hyuk Chang2, Yun-Hee Kim2, Kiwoong Kim3, Chang-Hwan Im4.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulation protocol that can facilitate or inhibit cortical excitability in particular areas of the brain. Although recent studies have reported that tDCS can successfully modulate the excitability of various brain sites, outcomes of tDCS were not consistent between subjects even when identical stimulation protocols were applied. Thus far, however, no studies have clearly verified the main cause of this individual variability. In this study, the main hypothesis was that individual variability in tDCS effects might be partly explained by anatomical differences among subjects. To verify our hypothesis, we investigated the relationship between the behavioral outcomes of a verbal working memory (WM) task and current density values at the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) simulated using the finite element method (FEM). A 3-back verbal working memory task experiment was conducted in 17 healthy subjects before and after tDCS with cathode and anode electrodes located at the right supraorbital and F3 locations, respectively. The results showed that participants who showed evidence of enhanced WM task performance after tDCS had a significantly larger current density at the DLPFC than other participants, suggesting that inconsistent behavioral outcomes of tDCS might be partly due to individual anatomical differences.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC); Finite element method; Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); Working memory task

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24508704     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.01.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  51 in total

1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of frontal cortex decreases performance on the WAIS-IV intelligence test.

Authors:  Kristin K Sellers; Juliann M Mellin; Caroline M Lustenberger; Michael R Boyle; Won Hee Lee; Angel V Peterchev; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  New information on the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on n-back task performance.

Authors:  Nira Mashal; Shlomit Metzuyanim-Gorelick
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Exploring prefrontal cortex functions in healthy humans by transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Min-Fang Kuo; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 4.  Current challenges: the ups and downs of tACS.

Authors:  Nicholas S Bland; Martin V Sale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The strategy and motivational influences on the beneficial effect of neurostimulation: a tDCS and fNIRS study.

Authors:  Kevin T Jones; Filiz Gözenman; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Electrical Stimulation Over Human Posterior Parietal Cortex Selectively Enhances the Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory.

Authors:  Sisi Wang; Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Yixuan Ku
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Ludovica Labruna; Asif Jamil; Shane Fresnoza; Giorgi Batsikadze; Min-Fang Kuo; Benjamin Vanderschelden; Richard B Ivry; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  The critical role of cognitive-based trait differences in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) suppression of food craving and eating in frank obesity.

Authors:  Mary Katherine Ray; Maria D Sylvester; Lauren Osborn; Joel Helms; Bulent Turan; Emilee E Burgess; Mary M Boggiano
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Direct-Current Stimulation Does Little to Improve the Outcome of Working Memory Training in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jonna Nilsson; Alexander V Lebedev; Anders Rydström; Martin Lövdén
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.