Literature DB >> 25462798

The strategy and motivational influences on the beneficial effect of neurostimulation: a tDCS and fNIRS study.

Kevin T Jones1, Filiz Gözenman2, Marian E Berryhill2.   

Abstract

Working memory (WM) capacity falls along a spectrum with some people demonstrating higher and others lower WM capacity. Efforts to improve WM include applying transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), in which small amounts of current modulate the activity of underlying neurons and enhance cognitive function. However, not everyone benefits equally from a given tDCS protocol. Recent findings revealed tDCS-related WM benefits for individuals with higher working memory (WM) capacity. Here, we test two hypotheses regarding those with low WM capacity to see if they too would benefit under more optimal conditions. We tested whether supplying a WM strategy (Experiment 1) or providing greater extrinsic motivation through incentives (Experiment 2) would restore tDCS benefit to the low WM capacity group. We also employed functional near infrared spectroscopy to monitor tDCS-induced changes in neural activity. Experiment 1 demonstrated that supplying a WM strategy improved the high WM capacity participants' accuracy and the amount of oxygenated blood levels following anodal tDCS, but it did not restore tDCS-linked WM benefits to the low WM capacity group. Experiment 2 demonstrated that financial motivation enhanced performance in both low and high WM capacity groups, especially after anodal tDCS. Here, only the low WM capacity participants showed a generalized increase in oxygenated blood flow across both low and high motivation conditions. These results indicate that ensuring that participants' incentives are high may expand cognitive benefits associated with tDCS. This finding is relevant for translational work using tDCS in clinical populations, in which motivation can be a concern.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional near infrared spectroscopy; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Working memory; Working memory capacity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25462798      PMCID: PMC4262534          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  94 in total

1.  Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia contributions to visual working memory.

Authors:  Bradley Voytek; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Prediction of immediate and future rewards differentially recruits cortico-basal ganglia loops.

Authors:  Saori C Tanaka; Kenji Doya; Go Okada; Kazutaka Ueda; Yasumasa Okamoto; Shigeto Yamawaki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-07-04       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards.

Authors:  Samuel M McClure; David I Laibson; George Loewenstein; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The effect of motivation on working memory: an fMRI and SEM study.

Authors:  Iwona Szatkowska; Piotr Bogorodzki; Tomasz Wolak; Artur Marchewka; Wojciech Szeszkowski
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Motivation enhances visual working memory capacity through the modulation of central cognitive processes.

Authors:  Motoyuki Sanada; Koki Ikeda; Kenta Kimura; Toshikazu Hasegawa
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy maps cortical plasticity underlying altered motor performance induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Bilal Khan; Timea Hodics; Nathan Hervey; George Kondraske; Ann M Stowe; George Alexandrakis
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Selective activation of the superior frontal gyrus in task-switching: an event-related fNIRS study.

Authors:  Simone Cutini; Pietro Scatturin; Enrica Menon; Patrizia Silvia Bisiacchi; Luciano Gamberini; Marco Zorzi; Roberto Dell'Acqua
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  NIRS in clinical neurology - a 'promising' tool?

Authors:  Hellmuth Obrig
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  A brain of two halves: insights into interhemispheric organization provided by near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Fumitaka Homae
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Right prefrontal activity reflects the ability to overcome sleepiness during working memory tasks: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Motoyasu Honma; Takahiro Soshi; Yoshiharu Kim; Kenichi Kuriyama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  27 in total

1.  Frontoparietal neurostimulation modulates working memory training benefits and oscillatory synchronization.

Authors:  Kevin T Jones; Dwight J Peterson; Kara J Blacker; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Older Adults Improve on Everyday Tasks after Working Memory Training and Neurostimulation.

Authors:  Jaclyn A Stephens; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Visual working memory deficits in undergraduates with a history of mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Hector Arciniega; Alexandrea Kilgore-Gomez; Alison Harris; Dwight J Peterson; Jaclyn McBride; Emily Fox; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Individual differences in neuroanatomy and neurophysiology predict effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; Kevin T Jones; Avery E Ostrand; Wan-Yu Hsu; Richard Campusano; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 9.184

5.  Working memory capacity differentially influences responses to tDCS and HD-tDCS in a retro-cue task.

Authors:  Filiz Gözenman; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 6.  The effect of the interval-between-sessions on prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Josefien Dedoncker; Andre R Brunoni; Chris Baeken; Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Longitudinal neurostimulation in older adults improves working memory.

Authors:  Kevin T Jones; Jaclyn A Stephens; Mahtab Alam; Marom Bikson; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Alpha Power Increase After Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at Alpha Frequency (α-tACS) Reflects Plastic Changes Rather Than Entrainment.

Authors:  Alexandra Vossen; Joachim Gross; Gregor Thut
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Wearable functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): expanding vistas for neurocognitive augmentation.

Authors:  Ryan McKendrick; Raja Parasuraman; Hasan Ayaz
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-09

Review 10.  Potentials and limits to enhance cognitive functions in healthy and pathological aging by tDCS.

Authors:  Kristin Prehn; Agnes Flöel
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.505

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.