Shihong Li1, Eric Y Chang2, Won C Bae3, Christine B Chung2, Yanqing Hua4, Yi Zhou5, Jiang Du3. 1. Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California 92103-8226; Department of Radiology, Hua Dong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China; Yancheng Medical College, Jiangsu, China; and The First People's Hospital of Yancheng City, Jiangsu 224005, China. 2. VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California 92161 and Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California 92103-8226. 3. Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California 92103-8226. 4. Department of Radiology, Hua Dong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China. 5. The First People's Hospital of Yancheng City, Jiangsu 224005, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of excitation, fat saturation, long T2 saturation, and adiabatic inversion pulses on ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging with bicomponent analysis of bound and free water in cortical bone for potential applications in osteoporosis. METHODS: Six bovine cortical bones and six human tibial midshaft samples were harvested for this study. Each bone sample was imaged with eight sequences using 2D UTE imaging at 3T with half and hard excitation pulses, without and with fat saturation, long T2 saturation, and adiabatic inversion recovery (IR) preparation pulses. Single- and bicomponent signal models were utilized to calculate the T2(*)s and/or relative fractions of short and long T2(*)s. RESULTS: For all bone samples UTE T2(*) signal decay showed bicomponent behavior. A higher short T2(*) fraction was observed on UTE images with hard pulse excitation compared with half pulse excitation (75.6% vs 68.8% in bovine bone, 79.9% vs 73.2% in human bone). Fat saturation pulses slightly reduced the short T2(*) fraction relative to regular UTE sequences (5.0% and 2.0% reduction, respectively, with half and hard excitation pulses for bovine bone, 6.3% and 8.2% reduction, respectively, with half and hard excitation pulses for human bone). Long T2 saturation pulses significantly reduced the long T2(*) fraction relative to regular UTE sequence (18.9% and 17.2% reduction, respectively, with half and hard excitation pulses for bovine bone, 26.4% and 27.7% reduction, respectively, with half and hard excitation pulses for human bone). With IR-UTE preparation the long T2(*) components were significantly reduced relative to regular UTE sequence (75.3% and 66.4% reduction, respectively, with half and hard excitation pulses for bovine bone, 87.7% and 90.3% reduction, respectively, with half and hard excitation pulses for human bone). CONCLUSIONS: Bound and free water T2(*)s and relative fractions can be assessed using UTE bicomponent analysis. Long T2(*) components are affected more by long T2 saturation and IR pulses, and short T2(*) components are affected more by fat saturation pulses.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of excitation, fat saturation, long T2 saturation, and adiabatic inversion pulses on ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging with bicomponent analysis of bound and free water in cortical bone for potential applications in osteoporosis. METHODS: Six bovine cortical bones and six human tibial midshaft samples were harvested for this study. Each bone sample was imaged with eight sequences using 2D UTE imaging at 3T with half and hard excitation pulses, without and with fat saturation, long T2 saturation, and adiabatic inversion recovery (IR) preparation pulses. Single- and bicomponent signal models were utilized to calculate the T2(*)s and/or relative fractions of short and long T2(*)s. RESULTS: For all bone samples UTE T2(*) signal decay showed bicomponent behavior. A higher short T2(*) fraction was observed on UTE images with hard pulse excitation compared with half pulse excitation (75.6% vs 68.8% in bovine bone, 79.9% vs 73.2% in human bone). Fat saturation pulses slightly reduced the short T2(*) fraction relative to regular UTE sequences (5.0% and 2.0% reduction, respectively, with half and hard excitation pulses for bovine bone, 6.3% and 8.2% reduction, respectively, with half and hard excitation pulses for human bone). Long T2 saturation pulses significantly reduced the long T2(*) fraction relative to regular UTE sequence (18.9% and 17.2% reduction, respectively, with half and hard excitation pulses for bovine bone, 26.4% and 27.7% reduction, respectively, with half and hard excitation pulses for human bone). With IR-UTE preparation the long T2(*) components were significantly reduced relative to regular UTE sequence (75.3% and 66.4% reduction, respectively, with half and hard excitation pulses for bovine bone, 87.7% and 90.3% reduction, respectively, with half and hard excitation pulses for human bone). CONCLUSIONS: Bound and free water T2(*)s and relative fractions can be assessed using UTE bicomponent analysis. Long T2(*) components are affected more by long T2 saturation and IR pulses, and short T2(*) components are affected more by fat saturation pulses.
Authors: Shihong Li; Eric Y Chang; Won C Bae; Christine B Chung; Song Gao; Shanglian Bao; Graeme M Bydder; Yanqing Hua; Jiang Du Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Shihong Li; Lanqing Ma; Eric Y Chang; Hongda Shao; Jun Chen; Christine B Chung; Graeme M Bydder; Jiang Du Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 4.044