Literature DB >> 15004801

Maximum likelihood estimation of signal amplitude and noise variance from MR data.

J Sijbers1, A J den Dekker.   

Abstract

In MRI, the raw data, which are acquired in spatial frequency space, are intrinsically complex valued and corrupted by Gaussian-distributed noise. After applying an inverse Fourier transform, the data remain complex valued and Gaussian distributed. If the signal amplitude is to be estimated, one has two options. It can be estimated directly from the complex valued data set, or one can first perform a magnitude operation on this data set, which changes the distribution of the data from Gaussian to Rician, and estimate the signal amplitude from the obtained magnitude image. Similarly, the noise variance can be estimated from both the complex and magnitude data sets. This article addresses the question whether it is better to use complex valued data or magnitude data for the estimation of these parameters using the maximum likelihood method. As a performance criterion, the mean-squared error (MSE) is used. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15004801     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  58 in total

1.  Diffusion time dependence of magnetic resonance diffusion signal decays: an investigation of water exchange in human brain in vivo.

Authors:  Marzieh Nezamzadeh
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  ROBUST MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION IN Q-SPACE MRI.

Authors:  B A Landman; J A D Farrell; S A Smith; P A Calabresi; P C M van Zijl; J L Prince
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2008-05-14

Review 3.  MR thermometry for monitoring tumor ablation.

Authors:  Baudouin Denis de Senneville; Charles Mougenot; Bruno Quesson; Iulius Dragonu; Nicolas Grenier; Chrit T W Moonen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  COmplex-Model-Based Estimation of thermal noise for fMRI data in the presence of artifacts.

Authors:  Yin Xu; Gaohong Wu; Daniel B Rowe; Yuan Ma; Rongyan Zhang; Guofan Xu; Shi-Jiang Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Quantitative image quality evaluation of MR images using perceptual difference models.

Authors:  Jun Miao; Donglai Huo; David L Wilson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Sequential anisotropic multichannel Wiener filtering with Rician bias correction applied to 3D regularization of DWI data.

Authors:  M Martin-Fernandez; E Muñoz-Moreno; L Cammoun; J-P Thiran; C-F Westin; C Alberola-López
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Rician noise removal by non-Local Means filtering for low signal-to-noise ratio MRI: applications to DT-MRI.

Authors:  Nicolas Wiest-Daesslé; Sylvain Prima; Pierrick Coupé; Sean Patrick Morrissey; Christian Barillot
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2008

8.  Assessment of bias in experimentally measured diffusion tensor imaging parameters using SIMEX.

Authors:  Carolyn B Lauzon; Ciprian Crainiceanu; Brian C Caffo; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  A framework for accurate determination of the T₂ distribution from multiple echo magnitude MRI images.

Authors:  Ruiliang Bai; Cheng Guan Koay; Elizabeth Hutchinson; Peter J Basser
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the diffusion parameter EStImation with Gibbs and NoisE removal pipeline.

Authors:  Benjamin Ades-Aron; Jelle Veraart; Peter Kochunov; Stephen McGuire; Paul Sherman; Elias Kellner; Dmitry S Novikov; Els Fieremans
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.