A Sarapata1, J W Stayman2, M Finkenthal3, J H Siewerdsen2, F Pfeiffer4, D Stutman3. 1. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218 and Department of Physics and Institute of Medical Engineering, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218. 3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218. 4. Department of Physics and Institute of Medical Engineering, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The authors present initial progress toward a clinically compatible x-ray phase contrast CT system, using glancing-angle x-ray grating interferometry to provide high contrast soft tissue images at estimated by computer simulation dose levels comparable to conventional absorption based CT. METHODS: DPC-CT scans of a joint phantom and of soft tissues were performed in order to answer several important questions from a clinical setup point of view. A comparison between high and low fringe visibility systems is presented. The standard phase stepping method was compared with sliding window interlaced scanning. Using estimated dose values obtained with a Monte-Carlo code the authors studied the dependence of the phase image contrast on exposure time and dose. RESULTS: Using a glancing angle interferometer at high x-ray energy (∼ 45 keV mean value) in combination with a conventional x-ray tube the authors achieved fringe visibility values of nearly 50%, never reported before. High fringe visibility is shown to be an indispensable parameter for a potential clinical scanner. Sliding window interlaced scanning proved to have higher SNRs and CNRs in a region of interest and to also be a crucial part of a low dose CT system. DPC-CT images of a soft tissue phantom at exposures in the range typical for absorption based CT of musculoskeletal extremities were obtained. Assuming a human knee as the CT target, good soft tissue phase contrast could be obtained at an estimated absorbed dose level around 8 mGy, similar to conventional CT. CONCLUSIONS: DPC-CT with glancing-angle interferometers provides improved soft tissue contrast over absorption CT even at clinically compatible dose levels (estimated by a Monte-Carlo computer simulation). Further steps in image processing, data reconstruction, and spectral matching could make the technique fully clinically compatible. Nevertheless, due to its increased scan time and complexity the technique should be thought of not as replacing, but as complimentary to conventional CT, to be used in specific applications.
PURPOSE: The authors present initial progress toward a clinically compatible x-ray phase contrast CT system, using glancing-angle x-ray grating interferometry to provide high contrast soft tissue images at estimated by computer simulation dose levels comparable to conventional absorption based CT. METHODS: DPC-CT scans of a joint phantom and of soft tissues were performed in order to answer several important questions from a clinical setup point of view. A comparison between high and low fringe visibility systems is presented. The standard phase stepping method was compared with sliding window interlaced scanning. Using estimated dose values obtained with a Monte-Carlo code the authors studied the dependence of the phase image contrast on exposure time and dose. RESULTS: Using a glancing angle interferometer at high x-ray energy (∼ 45 keV mean value) in combination with a conventional x-ray tube the authors achieved fringe visibility values of nearly 50%, never reported before. High fringe visibility is shown to be an indispensable parameter for a potential clinical scanner. Sliding window interlaced scanning proved to have higher SNRs and CNRs in a region of interest and to also be a crucial part of a low dose CT system. DPC-CT images of a soft tissue phantom at exposures in the range typical for absorption based CT of musculoskeletal extremities were obtained. Assuming a human knee as the CT target, good soft tissue phase contrast could be obtained at an estimated absorbed dose level around 8 mGy, similar to conventional CT. CONCLUSIONS: DPC-CT with glancing-angle interferometers provides improved soft tissue contrast over absorption CT even at clinically compatible dose levels (estimated by a Monte-Carlo computer simulation). Further steps in image processing, data reconstruction, and spectral matching could make the technique fully clinically compatible. Nevertheless, due to its increased scan time and complexity the technique should be thought of not as replacing, but as complimentary to conventional CT, to be used in specific applications.
Authors: F Pfeiffer; M Bech; O Bunk; P Kraft; E F Eikenberry; Ch Brönnimann; C Grünzweig; C David Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2008-01-20 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Min A Yoon; Se Hyung Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Hyoun Sik Woo; Eun Sun Lee; Se Jin Ahn; Joon Koo Han Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2012 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Susanne Grandl; Marian Willner; Julia Herzen; Doris Mayr; Sigrid D Auweter; Alexander Hipp; Franz Pfeiffer; Maximilian Reiser; Karin Hellerhoff Journal: Z Med Phys Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 4.820
Authors: Franz Pfeiffer; Julia Herzen; Marian Willner; Michael Chabior; Sigrid Auweter; Maximilian Reiser; Fabian Bamberg Journal: Z Med Phys Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 4.820
Authors: Peter B Noël; Julia Herzen; Alexander A Fingerle; Marian Willner; Marco K Stockmar; Dieter Hahn; Marcus Settles; Enken Drecoll; Irene Zanette; Timm Weitkamp; Ernst J Rummeny; Franz Pfeiffer Journal: Z Med Phys Date: 2013-04-06 Impact factor: 4.820
Authors: Arne Tapfer; Rickmer Braren; Martin Bech; Marian Willner; Irene Zanette; Timm Weitkamp; Marija Trajkovic-Arsic; Jens T Siveke; Marcus Settles; Michaela Aichler; Axel Walch; Franz Pfeiffer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alex George; Peter Y Chen; Alejandro Morales-Martinez; Alireza Panna; Andrew A Gomella; Eric E Bennett; Han Wen Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2017-03-24
Authors: Jonas Francisco Scopel; Luciano de Souza Queiroz; Francis Pierce O'Dowd; Marcondes Cavalcante França Júnior; Anamarli Nucci; Marcelo Gonçalves Hönnicke Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: A Velroyen; A Yaroshenko; D Hahn; A Fehringer; A Tapfer; M Müller; P B Noël; B Pauwels; A Sasov; A Ö Yildirim; O Eickelberg; K Hellbach; S D Auweter; F G Meinel; M F Reiser; M Bech; F Pfeiffer Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 8.143