Literature DB >> 24504546

Prognostic biomarkers in endometrial and ovarian carcinoma.

Xavier Matias-Guiu1, Ben Davidson.   

Abstract

This article reviews the main prognostic and predictive biomarkers of endometrial (EC) and ovarian carcinoma (OC). In EC, prognosis still relies on conventional pathological features such as histological type and grade, as well as myometrial or lymphovascular space invasion. Estrogen receptor, p53, Ki-67, and ploidy analysis are the most promising biomarkers among a long list of molecules that have been proposed. Also, a number of putative predictive biomarkers have been proposed in molecular targeted therapy. In OC, prognosis is predominantly dependent on disease stage at diagnosis and the extent of residual disease at primary operation. Diagnostic markers which aid in establishing histological type in OC are available. However, not a single universally accepted predictive or prognostic marker exists to date. Targeted therapy has been growingly focused at in recent years, in view of the frequent development of chemoresistance at recurrent disease. The present review emphasizes the crucial role of correct pathological classification and stringent selection criteria of the material studied as basis for any evaluation of biological markers. It further emphasizes the promise of targeted therapy in EC and OC, while simultaneously highlighting the difficulties remaining before this can become standard of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24504546     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-013-1509-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  170 in total

1.  Overexpression of HER-2/neu is not a risk factor in ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroshi Tanabe; Hiroshi Nishii; Akihiko Sakata; Keitaro Suzuki; Yukiko Mori; Hideo Shinozaki; Akihiko Watanabe; Kazuhiko Ochiai; Makoto Yasuda; Tadao Tanaka
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Key features of extrauterine pelvic serous tumours (fallopian tube, ovary, and peritoneum).

Authors:  Deborah Delair; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  HER-2 is an independent prognostic factor in endometrial cancer: association with outcome in a large cohort of surgically staged patients.

Authors:  Carl Morrison; Vanna Zanagnolo; Nilsa Ramirez; David E Cohn; Nicole Kelbick; Larry Copeland; G Larry Maxwell; Larry G Maxwell; Jeffrey M Fowler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Identification of a gene expression signature for survival prediction in type I endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Kristina Levan; Karolina Partheen; Lovisa Osterberg; Björn Olsson; Ulla Delle; Saskia Eklind; György Horvath
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  2010

5.  High-throughput interrogation of PIK3CA, PTEN, KRAS, FBXW7 and TP53 mutations in primary endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Diego A Garcia-Dios; Diether Lambrechts; Lieve Coenegrachts; Ingrid Vandenput; An Capoen; Penelope M Webb; Kaltin Ferguson; Lars A Akslen; Bart Claes; Ignace Vergote; Philippe Moerman; Johan Van Robays; Janusz Marcickiewicz; Helga B Salvesen; Amanda B Spurdle; Frédéric Amant
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 6.  Prognostic parameters of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Jaime Prat
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 7.  Adjuvant chemotherapy in endometrial carcinoma: overview of randomised trials.

Authors:  T Hogberg
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 4.126

8.  The multikinase inhibitor Sorafenib induces apoptosis and sensitises endometrial cancer cells to TRAIL by different mechanisms.

Authors:  D Llobet; N Eritja; A Yeramian; J Pallares; A Sorolla; M Domingo; M Santacana; F J Gonzalez-Tallada; X Matias-Guiu; X Dolcet
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  The E3 ubiquitin ligase EDD is an adverse prognostic factor for serous epithelial ovarian cancer and modulates cisplatin resistance in vitro.

Authors:  P M O'Brien; M J Davies; J P Scurry; A N Smith; C A Barton; M J Henderson; D N Saunders; B S Gloss; K I Patterson; J L Clancy; V A Heinzelmann-Schwarz; Rajmohan Murali; R A Scolyer; Y Zeng; E D Williams; L Scurr; A Defazio; D I Quinn; C K W Watts; N F Hacker; S M Henshall; R L Sutherland
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Functional genomics identifies five distinct molecular subtypes with clinical relevance and pathways for growth control in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Tuan Zea Tan; Qing Hao Miow; Ruby Yun-Ju Huang; Meng Kang Wong; Jieru Ye; Jieying Amelia Lau; Meng Chu Wu; Luqman Hakim Bin Abdul Hadi; Richie Soong; Mahesh Choolani; Ben Davidson; Jahn M Nesland; Ling-Zhi Wang; Noriomi Matsumura; Masaki Mandai; Ikuo Konishi; Boon-Cher Goh; Jeffrey T Chang; Jean Paul Thiery; Seiichi Mori
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 12.137

View more
  15 in total

1.  Clinical significance of Sam68 expression in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Qingying Wang; Yue Li; Jianhong Zhou; Jie Liu; Jinlong Qin; Feng Xing; Jiawen Zhang; Jiajing Cheng
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-01-21

Review 2.  Molecular staging of gynecological cancer: What is the future?

Authors:  Pratibha S Binder; Jaime Prat; David G Mutch
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.237

3.  Prognostic biomarkers: an introduction.

Authors:  Fred T Bosman; Lawrence D True
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Revisiting tumour aneuploidy - the place of ploidy assessment in the molecular era.

Authors:  Håvard E Danielsen; Manohar Pradhan; Marco Novelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Improvement of a predictive model in ovarian cancer patients submitted to platinum-based chemotherapy: implications of a GST activity profile.

Authors:  Deolinda Pereira; Joana Assis; Mónica Gomes; Augusto Nogueira; Rui Medeiros
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Prognostic value of circulating tumor cells and disseminated tumor cells in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Long Cui; Joseph Kwong; Chi Chiu Wang
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.234

7.  Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 is involved in the proliferation of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Nan Jia; Qing Li; Xiang Tao; Jieyu Wang; Keqin Hua; Weiwei Feng
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Expression of P-REX2a is associated with poor prognosis in endometrial malignancies.

Authors:  Sho Takeshita; Yoriko Yamashita; Kosuke Shiomi; Nako Suzuki; Jun Yoshida; Aya Naiki-Ito; Shugo Suzuki; Shinya Akatsuka; Shinya Toyokuni; Takashi Takahashi; Shoko Mase; Atsushi Arakawa; Mayumi Sugiura-Ogasawara; Satoru Takahashi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-05-15

9.  Identification of two poorly prognosed ovarian carcinoma subtypes associated with CHEK2 germ-line mutation and non-CHEK2 somatic mutation gene signatures.

Authors:  Ghim Siong Ow; Anna V Ivshina; Gloria Fuentes; Vladimir A Kuznetsov
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Mitochondrial ribosomal protein S18-2 is highly expressed in endometrial cancers along with free E2F1.

Authors:  Miriam Mints; Muhammad Mushtaq; Natalia Iurchenko; Larysa Kovalevska; Maria C Stip; Daria Budnikova; Sonia Andersson; Ludmila Polischuk; Lubov Buchynska; Elena Kashuba
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.