Literature DB >> 34476375

Clinical Potential of Nerve Input to Tumors: A Bioelectricity Perspective.

Jade A Phillips1, Charlotte Hutchings1, Mustafa B A Djamgoz1,2.   

Abstract

We support the notion that the neural connections of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and the associated 'bioelectricity' play significant role in the pathophysiology of cancer. In several cancers, the nerve input promotes the cancer process. While straightforward surgical denervation of tumors, therefore, could improve prognosis, resulting side effects of such a procedure would be unpredictable and irreversible. On the other hand, tumor innervation can be manipulated effectively for therapeutic purposes by alternative novel approaches broadly termed "electroceuticals." In this perspective, we evaluate the clinical potential of targeting the TME first through manipulation of the nerve input itself and second by application of electric fields directly to the tumor. The former encompasses several different biophysical and biochemical approaches. These include implantable devices, nanoparticles, and electroactive polymers, as well as optogenetics and chemogenetics. As regard bioelectrical manipulation of the tumor itself, the "tumor-treating field" technique, applied to gliomas commonly in combination with chemotherapy, is evaluated. Also, as electroceuticals, drugs acting on ion channels and neurotransmitter receptors are highlighted for completeness. It is concluded, first, that electroceuticals comprise a broad range of biomedical tools. Second, such electroceuticals present significant clinical potential for exploiting the neural component of the TME as a strategy against cancer. Finally, the inherent bioelectric characteristics of tumors themselves are also amenable to complementary approaches. Collectively, these represent an evolving, dynamic field and further progress and applications can be expected to follow both conceptually and technically. Copyright 2021, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemogenetics; electroactive polymers; implantable devices; nanotechnology; optogenetics; tumor microenvironment; tumor-treating fields

Year:  2021        PMID: 34476375      PMCID: PMC8390776          DOI: 10.1089/bioe.2020.0051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectricity        ISSN: 2576-3105


  117 in total

Review 1.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.

Authors:  Daniel R Merrill; Marom Bikson; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 2.  Biocompatible propulsion for biomedical micro/nano robotics.

Authors:  Arnab Halder; Yi Sun
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 10.618

3.  Aptamers as targeted therapeutics: current potential and challenges.

Authors:  Jiehua Zhou; John Rossi
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 4.  The potential of nanoparticle vaccines as a treatment for cancer.

Authors:  David Urbanavicius; Tara Alvarez; Georgina K Such; Angus P R Johnston; Justine D Mintern
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.407

5.  A Theoretical Study on the Biophysical Mechanisms by Which Tumor Treating Fields Affect Tumor Cells During Mitosis.

Authors:  Xing Li; Fan Yang; Boris Rubinsky
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 6.  The calcium-cancer signalling nexus.

Authors:  Gregory R Monteith; Natalia Prevarskaya; Sarah J Roberts-Thomson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 7.  Nerves in cancer.

Authors:  Ali H Zahalka; Paul S Frenette
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 8.  Cancer-Associated Neurogenesis and Nerve-Cancer Cross-talk.

Authors:  Deborah A Silverman; Vena K Martinez; Patrick M Dougherty; Jeffrey N Myers; George A Calin; Moran Amit
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 13.312

9.  Genome-wide analysis reveals conserved transcriptional responses downstream of resting potential change in Xenopus embryos, axolotl regeneration, and human mesenchymal cell differentiation.

Authors:  Vaibhav P Pai; Christopher J Martyniuk; Karen Echeverri; Sarah Sundelacruz; David L Kaplan; Michael Levin
Journal:  Regeneration (Oxf)       Date:  2015-11-26

10.  Use of genetically encoded, light-gated ion translocators to control tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Brook T Chernet; Dany S Adams; Maria Lobikin; Michael Levin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.