Literature DB >> 21989778

Electrode dysfunctions in patients with deep brain stimulation: a clinical retrospective study.

Niels Allert1, Markella Markou, Anna Antonina Miskiewicz, Lars Nolden, Hans Karbe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electrode fractures are known hardware problems in patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) and require surgical revision. Short circuits, loose connections or disconnections of only single contacts of the common quadripolar stimulation electrodes are more subtle dysfunctions and can result in decreased efficacy of DBS. Measuring the impedances of electrodes helps detect such technical dysfunctions. This study evaluates the frequency and clinical implications of abnormal impedance measurements.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed findings of systematic impedance checks in 591 consecutive patients with DBS for various movement disorders treated in our DBS center between 2005 and 2010.
FINDINGS: A technical dysfunction was found in 36 out of 1,142 electrodes (3.2%). Short circuits (22 electrodes) were more frequent than disconnections of single contacts (8 electrodes) or loose contacts (6 electrodes). Moreover, after 109 replacements of impulse generators another 16 electrodes revealed technical dysfunctions, again with short circuits (9 electrodes) exceeding disconnections of single contacts (5 electrodes) and loose contacts (2 electrodes). Most of the short circuits occurred immediately after surgical interventions. In contrast, among dysfunctions occurring later during long-term DBS, disconnections and loose contacts prevailed. Surgical revision was performed in 4 of the overall 52 electrodes with dysfunctions, whereas in the other electrodes adjustment of stimulation parameters resulted in stable and satisfying symptom control.
CONCLUSIONS: Technical dysfunctions of stimulation electrodes or extension leads are rare but important sources of unsatisfying DBS efficacy. In the majority of cases DBS programming or reprogramming allows avoiding surgical revision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21989778     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-011-1187-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  5 in total

1.  Variation in deep brain stimulation electrode impedance over years following electrode implantation.

Authors:  David Satzer; David Lanctin; Lynn E Eberly; Aviva Abosch
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 1.875

2.  Morphological and chemical analysis of a deep brain stimulation electrode explanted from a dystonic patient.

Authors:  Carlo Marras; Michele Rizzi; Luca Ravagnan; Alessandro De Benedictis; Giovanna Zorzi; Gero Bongiorno; Davide Marchesi; Giuseppe Messina; Roberto Cordella; Angelo Franzini
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Stereotactic surgery for eating disorders.

Authors:  Bomin Sun; Wei Liu
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-04-17

4.  Long-Term Performance and User Satisfaction With Implanted Neuroprostheses for Upright Mobility After Paraplegia: 2- to 14-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Ronald J Triolo; Stephanie Nogan Bailey; Kevin M Foglyano; Rudi Kobetic; Lisa M Lombardo; Michael E Miller; Gilles Pinault
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Management of Elevated Therapeutic Impedances on Deep Brain Stimulation Leads.

Authors:  Wissam Deeb; Amar Patel; Michael S Okun; Aysegul Gunduz
Journal:  Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y)       Date:  2017-09-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.