Periderms present in plant barks are essential protective barriers to water diffusion, mechanical breakdown, and pathogenic invasion. They consist of densely packed layers of dead cells with cell walls that are embedded with suberin. Understanding the interplay of molecular structure, dynamics, and biomechanics in these cell wall-associated insoluble amorphous polymeric assemblies presents substantial investigative challenges. We report solid-state NMR coordinated with FT-IR and tensile strength measurements for periderms from native and wound-healing potatoes and from potatoes with genetically modified suberins. The analyses include the intact suberin aromatic-aliphatic polymer and cell-wall polysaccharides, previously reported soluble depolymerized transmethylation products, and undegraded residues including suberan. Wound-healing suberized potato cell walls, which are 2 orders of magnitude more permeable to water than native periderms, display a strikingly enhanced hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance, a degradation-resistant aromatic domain, and flexibility suggestive of an altered supramolecular organization in the periderm. Suppression of ferulate ester formation in suberin and associated wax remodels the periderm with more flexible aliphatic chains and abundant aromatic constituents that can resist transesterification, attenuates cooperative hydroxyfatty acid motions, and produces a mechanically compromised and highly water-permeable periderm.
Periderms present in plant barks are essential protective barriers to water diffusion, mechanical breakdown, and pathogenic invasion. They consist of densely packed layers of dead cells with cell walls that are embedded with suberin. Understanding the interplay of molecular structure, dynamics, and biomechanics in these cell wall-associated insoluble amorphous polymeric assemblies presents substantial investigative challenges. We report solid-state NMR coordinated with FT-IR and tensile strength measurements for periderms from native and wound-healing potatoes and from potatoes with genetically modified suberins. The analyses include the intact suberin aromatic-aliphatic polymer and cell-wall polysaccharides, previously reported soluble depolymerized transmethylation products, and undegraded residues including suberan. Wound-healing suberized potato cell walls, which are 2 orders of magnitude more permeable to water than native periderms, display a strikingly enhanced hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance, a degradation-resistant aromatic domain, and flexibility suggestive of an altered supramolecular organization in the periderm. Suppression of ferulate ester formation in suberin and associated wax remodels the periderm with more flexible aliphatic chains and abundant aromatic constituents that can resist transesterification, attenuates cooperative hydroxyfatty acid motions, and produces a mechanically compromised and highly water-permeable periderm.
Cork, technically designated as phellem,
is the outermost tissue
of the periderm, a complex dermal structure that replaces the plant
epidermis in mature (secondary) organs such as tree trunks, roots
and tubers, and healing tissues.[1] Cork
works as an efficient barrier that protects the plant from dehydration
and injuries. It is made of tightly packed dead cells evolved to fulfill
two main requirements: to be impermeable to water and elastic enough
to withstand mechanical stress. Cork hydrophobicity and mechanical
resistance are attributed to the suberin macromolecule that is embedded
within cork cell walls,[2,3] making an understanding of this
composite material potentially useful for the design of analogous
engineered polymeric materials.The suberin polymer is comprised
of aromatic and aliphatic domains
linked via ester bonds.[4−7] Its aromatic lignin-like domain consists of a polymer made from
monolignols and hydroxycinnamic (mostly ferulic) acids and derivatives;
this domain is thought to be covalently bound to primary cell-wall
polysaccharides.[8,9] The aliphatic domain is a biopolyester
that upon transesterification releases mainly soluble C16–C28 ω-hydroxyacids and α,ω-diacids
but also fatty acids and primary alcohols, glycerol, and small amounts
of ferulic acid.[10] Deposited between the
primary wall and the cell plasma membrane, the aliphatic domain forms
a polymeric matrix in which a mixture of extractable lipids (associated
waxes), most related to suberin monomers, is dispersed. Under the
electron microscope, the aliphatic matrix with embedded waxes appears
as a multilamellar stack indicative of a highly organized macromolecular
assembly.[11] Substantial residues that resist
saponification, which broadly speaking are designated as suberan,
have also been reported in suberized tissues.[8,12−14] They represent a portion of the suberin macromolecular
assembly containing aliphatic and aromatic constituents and covalently
linked polysaccharides.Although extensive compositional information
is available for suberin,
its macromolecular organization[7,15] and interactions with
other cell-wall polymers[6] are still far
from being understood. A central challenge for the molecular characterization
of cell-wall biopolymers involves focusing on the material of interest
without compromising its inherent molecular structure. The suberin
information obtained by GC-MS is limited to the portion of the polymer
susceptible to breakdown and is largely confined to identification
of monomeric fragments. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (ssNMR),
which can elucidate the functional groups and cross-link sites within
intact polymers,[16−18] provides a complementary investigative route. For
instance, previous ssNMR studies have yielded important structural
information on cutin, the cell wall biopolyester in the epidermis
of leaves, young shoots, and fruits.[16,19−22] Information derived from ssNMR has also been reported on suberin
from industrial cork[23−26] and from potato tuber periderm. Whereas most studies of potatosuberin
by ssNMR and FT-IR methods have used the wound periderm,[9,27−31] recently the native tuber periderm has also been investigated.[13,32,33] The two types of periderm are
similar in relative aliphaticsuberin composition[34,35] but differ significantly with respect to the aromatic products resulting
from thioacidolysis[36] and have permeabilities
to water that span 2 orders of magnitude.[34] By considering the respective intact polymers, soluble depolymerization
products and undegraded residues in concert, a more comprehensive
understanding of suberin should be available.Targeted genetic
engineering, which can be applied to specifically
modify individual polymers without damaging the structural integrity
of the cell wall, is a powerful tool for the investigation of plant
macromolecular assemblies. Recently, potato lines with genetically
modified suberin were generated by RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated
gene silencing: StKCS6, involved in aliphatic chain elongation;[37] CYP86A33, responsible for the ω-hydroxylation
of fatty acids; and FHT, necessary for the formation of suberin alkyl
ferulates.[38] These studies revealed significant
changes in suberin composition and ultrastructure but also in periderm
texture and water barrier properties (Table 1). The availability of these modified potato periderms for ssNMR
analyses, supported by FT-IR and tensile strength, offers exciting
new prospects for determining how the molecular interactions ultimately
control the viscoelastic properties and permeability of the cork cell
walls.
Table 1
Summary of Functional Properties,
Ultrastructure, and Transesterification Products for Genetically Modified
Native Periderms as Compared with Wild-Type
name
native periderm ultrastructure, waterproofing,
and chemical compositiona
Calculated
as μg of suberin
mg–1 dry periderm (see Table
S1).
Calculated
as μg of suberin
mg–1 dry periderm (see Table
S1).
Materials
and Methods
Plant Material
Wild-type and genetically modified potato
plants (Solanum tuberosum) used in
this work were from cv Desirée. The plants were propagated
in vitro, transferred to soil and greenhouse grown to obtain tubers
as described by Serra et al.[37] For all
experiments, two lines corresponding to two different previously characterized
transformation events were used for each genetic modification (StKCS6-RNAi,
lines 5 and 34; CYP86A33-RNAi, lines 22 and 39; FHT-RNAi, lines 4
and 37). Tomato exocarp was prepared as described previously.[45]
Suberin-Enriched Periderm Membranes
The native periderm
was collected from mature tubers stored at room temperature for 21
days after harvest. The periderm of the tubers (peel) was separated
using a potato peeler and the phellem or cork layer isolated using
an enzymatic mixture. To remove unsuberized tissue, the peels were
shaken at 150 rpm with 2% (v/v) Aspergillus niger cellulase (MP Biomedicals, Illkirch, France) in a 50 mM pH 5.0 acetate
buffer, for 48 h each at 37 and 44 °C, respectively. Subsequently,
the peels were treated with 2% (v/v) A. niger pectinase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in a pH 4.0 acetate buffer, for
24 h each at 28 and 31 °C, respectively. Sodium azide (Sigma,
St. Louis, MO) was added at 1 mM final concentration to inhibit bacterial
growth. Then the isolated periderm membranes, comprising exclusively
the suberized cell walls of the phellem (cork) layer of the periderm,
were washed with deionized water and dried at 35 °C. Although
only the suberized phellem tissue is obtained whereas the phellogen
and phelloderm are digested during the enzymatic treatment, we use
the term periderm instead of phellem following a number of prior authors.[30,39,40]The wound periderm was
obtained from healing potato discs 7 days after wounding. The discs
were prepared by sectioning the potato flesh tissue from 7-month old
tubers with a mandolin slicer and left to heal on wet cellulose filter
paper placed on a wire netting inside plastic boxes that contained
water at the bottom to maintain humidity. The brown layer of wound
periderm on the surface was collected by blade peeling at 7 days as
described previously.[41] Removal of unsuberized
tissues was conducted enzymatically as described above.Wax-free
periderm membranes were obtained by Soxhlet extraction
under reflux conditions using three successive solvents of varying
polarity, methanol, chloroform, and hexane, for 24 h each. The resulting
suberin-rich wax-free periderms were used for ssNMR analysis on intact
suberin; FT-IR experiments were performed on both undewaxed and wax-free
materials.
Undegraded Suberin Residue from Depolymerization
The
residues were obtained from wax-free periderm membranes by incubation
for 18 h at 70 °C with 10% (v/v) n class="Chemical">boron trifluoride in methanol
(BF3; Fluka, St. Louis, MO) to achieve polymer degradation
by transesterification.[42,43] These protocols have
been validated extensively.[29,40,44]
Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy
Compositional analyses
of periderms were made from solid-state NMR spectra. Analogously to
experiments reported for tomato fruit cutins,[45] magic-angle spinning 13CNMR data were collected on 2–5
mg of powdered plant material with a Varian (Agilent) VNMRS NMR spectrometer
equipped with a 1.6 mm FastMAS probe operating at a typical spinning
speed of 10 or 15 kHz (±20 Hz). The ramped-amplitude cross-polarization
magic-angle spinning experiments (CPMAS) were conducted with a spin-lock/cross-polarization
(CP) time of 1–2 ms, a 10–20% linear ramp of the 1H field strength during cross-polarization, and a 3 s recycle
delay between successive acquisitions so as to identify carbon-containing
functional groups via their respective chemical shifts. In addition,
CPMAS 13C experiments with a 10 kHz spinning rate and interrupted
proton decoupling for periods of 10–40 μs prior to signal
acquisition were conducted to suppress signals from carbons relaxed
by attached hydrogens, while retaining nonprotonated and mobile carbon
moieties.[46,47] Direct-polarization experiments (DPMAS)
using a 100 s recycle delay provided relative proportions of each
carbon moiety via integration of specified spectral regions. The SPINAL
method[48] was used to implement high-power
heteronuclear proton decoupling, achieving 1H field strengths
corresponding to 170–185 kHz in separate experiments. Detailed
experimental parameters for both CPMAS and DPMAS measurements have
been reported elsewhere.[45,49,50]The spectral data were typically processed with 100–200
Hz line broadening and analyzed in parallel using VNMRJ (version 2.2C;
Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) and ACD/NMR Processor Academic
Edition (version 12; Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc., Toronto,
ON, Canada, www.acdlabs.com, 2013). Chemical shifts were
referenced externally to the methylene (−CH2−)
group of adamantane (Sigma-Aldrich) at 38.48 ppm. Integrated signal
intensities were measured using both cut-and-weigh methods and Photoshop
software, designating the following chemical shift ranges for each
major structural grouping: alkyl chains (8–50 ppm); alkoxy
groups (50–92 ppm); arenes and alkenes (92–160 ppm);
carboxyl groups (160–185 ppm). Experimental error limits for
the compositional analyses (10–15%) were evaluated by repeating
the DPMAS measurements at two different values of 1H decoupling
power; biological error limits (∼15%) were established from
experiments on replicate periderm samples, as described previously
for tomato fruit cuticles.[45]Molecular
flexibility assessments were made by several methods.
The fraction of “liquid-like” (CH2) groups was estimated for each potato periderm sample
by comparison of DPMASNMR signal intensities with low-power (∼5
kHz) and high-power (∼175–180 kHz) 1H decoupling.
The rapid (∼108–109 s–1) and slow (∼105 s–1) motions
were each assessed at several carbon sites of the wild-type native
and wound periderms using solid-state NMR spin relaxation experiments.
Traditional 1H rotating-frame relaxation times that allow
for abundant-spin diffusion, ⟨T1ρ(H)⟩, were measured from the decay of carbon signal intensities
with 13C–1H contact time in a CPMAS experiment.[51] Site-specific rotating-frame relaxation times, T1ρ(H), for each 1H nucleus
directly bonded to an observed 13C nucleus, were measured
with a Lee–Goldburg (LG) spin lock and LG cross-polarization
period to suppress 1H spin diffusion;[52,53] the experiments used a short 0.5 ms LGCP time and included 62–106
kHz LG pulses in separate trials. The LGCP experiments were also conducted
rotor asynchronously. The latter spin relaxation experiment was validated
by comparison with published results for crystalline alanine (Sigma-Aldrich).[54,55] To determine the carbon spin–lattice relaxation times T1(C), the recovery of 13C signal
intensity was monitored following cross-polarization with a 2 ms contact
time and inversion of the signal.[56] All
relaxation measurements were conducted at a spinning speed of 10 kHz
(±20 Hz) and a nominal set temperature of 25 °C. Both T1(C) and T1ρ(H) relaxation data were fit using Origin software (OriginLab, Northampton,
MA); for each carbon peak, the relaxation curve obtained using maximal
peak height was fit by a single-exponential function.[57,58]
FT-IR Analysis
Spectra were measured with either of
two instruments equipped for Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR) analyses:
a Satellite FT-IR spectrometer (Mattson Instruments, Madison, WI;
Specac, Slough, England) or a Nicolet 380 Smart MIRacle FT-IR spectrometer
(Thermo Electron Corporation, Madison, WI) for undewaxed and dewaxed
periderms, respectively. Undewaxed periderm samples were enzymatically
isolated membranes, with measurements made for four individual wild-type
tubers and four individual FHT-RNAi tubers (two from line 4 and two
from line 37). Dewaxed periderm samples were powdered material prepared
for the NMR experiments. Spectra were recorded between 4000 and 550
cm–1, with resolution of 4 cm–1 and 16 scans per sample (undewaxed), 2 cm–1 and
64–128 scans (dewaxed). For spectral comparisons, multiple-point
baseline correction including local minima around 4000, 3700, 3000,
2700, 1800, 1700, 1485, 1190, 775, and 630 cm–1 was
performed in conjunction with spectral normalization following Zeier
and Schreiber.[59] Band integration of each
spectrum was conducted using eFTIR software (Essential FTIR, http://www.essentialftir.com/index.html). The aliphatic (CH2) and aromatic (C=C) stretching regions were roughly
integrated in the ranges 2990–2815 and 1700–1480 cm–1, respectively.[13]
Tensile
Strength and SEM Analysis
Undewaxed native
periderm membranes were hydrated by soaking in water for 1 h, then
cut into narrow strips 5 mm in width and 15 mm in length. The strips
were mounted in a dynamic mechanical analyzer (DMA, Mettler Toledo
DMA/SDTA 861e, Columbus, OH) and held by grips exposing a 5.5 mm length
of periderm strip. Then the periderm was pulled to increase the tension
at a constant rate of 0.11 mm min–1 until failure
produced two broken fragments. The broken fragments were fixed under
vacuum with 4% formaldehyde in pH 7.5 phosphate-buffered saline at
room temperature for at least 48 h. Then, they were dehydrated with
an increasing ethanol concentration series, exchanged through amyl
acetate and critical-point dried. The pieces were mounted on copper
stubs and coated with gold. Two replicates of each were obtained for
StKCS6-RNAi (line 34), CYP86A33-RNAi (line 22), FHT-RNAi (line 37),
and wild-type periderms. Specimens were observed using a Zeiss DSM
960A scanning electron microscope (SEM; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
Digital images were collected and processed using Quartz PCI 5.10
software (Quartz Imaging Corporation, Vancouver, Canada).
Results
Molecular Structures of Suberin in Native versus
Wound Periderms
The molecular composition and structure of
suberin were compared for wild-type wound and native periderm samples.
Cross-polarization magic-angle spinning (CPMAS) 13CNMR
was first used to establish the reproducibility of data collected
on nominally identical samples and to make a rapid qualitative assessment
of the chemical moieties present in each periderm type. Figure 1 shows representative spectra of the intact suberin
in native and wound dewaxed periderms. A high degree of similarity
was established among biological replicates (Figure
S1); reproducibility of the spectroscopic results was also
verified by duplicate measurements on the same sample at two different
spinning speeds (10 and 15 kHz). In spite of the observation of relatively
broad resonances,[12] the resolution of the
high-field spectra was sufficient to allow provisional identification
of numerous carbon types by reference to previously published reports.
These assignments are summarized in Figure 1 and Table S2.
Figure 1
CPMAS 13C
NMR (150 MHz) of wax-free wild-type and genetically
modified (RNAi) native and wound periderms, showing analogous aliphatic-aromatic
polyester functional groupings in different proportions. Quantitatively
reliable ratios of different carbon types were obtained from analogous
DPMAS spectra.
CPMAS 13CNMR (150 MHz) of wax-free wild-type and genetically
modified (RNAi) native and wound periderms, showing analogous aliphatic-aromatic
polyester functional groupings in different proportions. Quantitatively
reliable ratios of different carbon types were obtained from analogous
DPMAS spectra.As expected for a chemically
heterogeneous aliphatic-aromatic polyester,
the intact suberin in both native and wound periderms exhibits broad
spectral features and displays resonances attributable to long-chain
aliphatics (centered at 25–33 ppm), alkenes and aromatics (120–160
ppm), and carboxyl groups (170–173 ppm).[27] Both materials show characteristic resonances from polysaccharide
cell walls and/or other CHO and CH2O moieties (62–101
ppm) and the CH3O groups typical of guaiacyl and sinapyl
hydroxycinnamic acid moieties. These resonance assignments were also
confirmed in native periderm using delayed decoupling experiments,[46] which distinguish rigid protonated carbons from
nonprotonated and relatively mobile functional groups[27] (Figure S2).Despite the
observation of comparable CPMAS resonances indicating
a common set of carbon-containing moieties, quantitatively reliable
direct-polarization magic-angle spinning (DPMAS) 13CNMR
experiments revealed notably different relative amounts of the principal
structures in intact suberins from native and wound periderms (Figure 2). The latter measurements are essential for amorphous
materials: their comparatively mobile segments cross polarize inefficiently
and are thus undercounted in the traditional CPMAS spectrum, whereas
their most rigid molecular moieties will display broadened resonances
if the 1H decoupling field is too small. Although quantitative
comparisons between spectra of different materials
may also be compromised by instrumental variations or uncertainties
in mass, the relative ratios within each spectrum
permit reliable and informative compositional comparisons.[60] The DPMAS spectra and integrated areas of key
spectral regions reveal, most strikingly, that intact suberin in native
periderm has a greater relative number of chain methylene groups (8–50
ppm) with respect to multiply bonded (92–160 ppm), oxygenated
aliphatic (50–92 ppm), and COO (160–185 ppm) moieties
(Figure 3). Viewed from the perspective of
the (CH2) groups that are
expected to associate strongly with waxes to form a waterproofing
layer, a progressively increasing proportion of alkyl chain content
is observed in potato wound periderm, then native periderm, and finally
tomato fruit cutin.[18,45,49,61] Conversely, the polysaccharide- and polyester-derived
alkoxy carbons outnumber the (CH2) groups in wound-healing tissues.
Figure 2
DPMAS 13C
NMR (150 MHz) of wax-free wild-type and genetically
modified (RNAi) native periderm and wound periderm, used to determine
ratios of carbon types within each spectrum.
Figure 3
Ratios of carbon-containing functional groups in potato periderms
and tomato fruit cuticles, derived from DPMAS 13C NMR spectra
obtained at an operating frequency of 150 MHz. Detailed procedures
and error limits are described in the Materials
and Methods.
DPMASn class="Chemical">13C
NMR (150 MHz) of wax-free wild-type and genetically
modified (RNAi) native periderm and wound periderm, used to determine
ratios of carbon types within each spectrum.
Ratios of carbon-containing functional groups in potato periderms
and tomato fruit cuticles, derived from DPMAS13CNMR spectra
obtained at an operating frequency of 150 MHz. Detailed procedures
and error limits are described in the Materials
and Methods.
Molecular
Structures of Suberin in Genetically
Modified Native Potato Periderm
Intact suberin in native
periderm from potatoes that are genetically modified to alter the
biosynthesis of specific suberin structures (Table 1; see Table S1 for comparative
chemical composition of depolymerization products) was analyzed and
compared with wild-type native and wound periderms. Figure 1 shows CPMAS 13CNMR spectra of StKCS6-RNAi,
CYP86A33-RNAi, and FHT-RNAi intact suberins compared with that of
wild-type. Biological replicates of the RNAi-silenced plants, including
two independent transformation lines for each down-regulated gene,
yielded highly reproducible NMR spectra (Figure
S3). For these intact suberins, our CPMAS spectra and delayed
decoupling results (Figure S2) showed that
each genetically modified macromolecular assembly contains the same
chemical groups, but the spectra also provided preliminary indications
of their notably different relative NMR signal intensities and corresponding
functional group proportions.Quantitative analysis of the corresponding
DPMAS spectra yields the ratios shown in Figure 4, which compare the amounts of each structural element to the long-chain
methylene groups. Figure 4A shows that the
ratios of alkoxy carbons (from the suberin polyester and associated
cell-wall polysaccharides) to (CH2) groups rise to 2.2 and 1.6 times their wild-type values in
CYP86A33-RNAi and FHT-RNAi intact suberins, respectively. Figure 4B shows a qualitatively similar trend for carboxyl
groups as compared with long-chain aliphatics, including progressive
increases for StKCS6-RNAi, FHT-RNAi, and CYP86A33-RNAi intact suberins.
Both of these compositional trends indicate an enhanced hydrophilic–hydrophobic
balance and parallel the findings of prior chemical analyses conducted
for soluble depolymerization (transesterification) products (Table 1). That is, for intact suberins from FHT-RNAi and
CYP86A33-RNAi periderms, the relative reduction in (CH2) groups is reasonable because the amounts
of the predominantly fatty acid and fatty alcohol product mixtures
drop to 38–57% in those two downregulated lines; conversely
the amounts of the intact StKCS6-RNAi suberin products are nearly
identical to the wild-type periderm.
Figure 4
Ratios of carbon-containing functional
groups and fractions of
mobile long-chain methylene groups in native periderms from wild-type
and genetically modified plants, and fractions of mobile long-chain
methylene groups in tomato cutins, derived from DPMAS 13C NMR spectra obtained at an operating frequency of 150 MHz.
Ratios of carbon-containing functional
groups and fractions of
mobile long-chain methylene groups in native periderms from wild-type
and genetically modified plants, and fractions of mobile long-chain
methylene groups in tomato cutins, derived from DPMAS13CNMR spectra obtained at an operating frequency of 150 MHz.In an analogous manner, Figure 4C illustrates
the similarity in relative amounts of aromatics and alkenes with respect
to (CH2) groups for StKCS6-RNAi
intact suberin compared to the wild-type, but also a nearly 2-fold
increase for the CYP86A33-RNAi and FHT-RNAi suberins. It should be
noted that in our quantitative estimates the resonances between 92
and 160 ppm are considered as a group, although qualitative differences
are observable among the native periderm spectra displayed in Figure 2, especially for the FHT-RNAi. For CYP86A33-RNAi,
this observation parallels the prior transesterification results,
which show lesser reductions in aromatic breakdown products than either
fatty acids or alcohols.[44] Thus, the sharp
reduction of fatty acid and alcohols along with their (CH2) groups could contribute to this relative
increase in aromatics. The augmented aromatic content of FHT-RNAi
compared with wild-type is also supported by FT-IR spectra of the
periderms (Figure S4), albeit with a larger
degree of variability among undewaxed biological replicates. These
latter spectra display notably enhanced ratios of stretching bands
attributable to phenolic acids and aromatics conjugated with C=C
moieties (1700–1480 cm–1) with respect to
aliphatic chain CH2 groups (2990–2815 cm–1),[13] in addition to hydrogen-bonded OH
groups (3356 cm–1) attributable to both polyesters
and waxes; measurements for dewaxed periderms (Figure S4) were largely consistent with the NMR-derived compositional
trends for native and wound periderms. The augmented prevalence of
arenes and alkenes for the FHT-RNAi periderm, which may appear surprising
in light of notably reduced ferulates found among the corresponding
soluble transesterification products,[38] is addressed below in terms of possible structural changes within
the aromatic suberin domain. Nonetheless, delayed decoupling 13C CPMAS spectra for both native FHT-RNAi and wild-type periderms
(Figure S2) yield CH/C estimates (0.5–0.7)
indicative of predominantly sinapyl and guaiacyl phenolic units, as
reported previously for wild-type potato wound periderm.[9]
Molecular Structures of Undegraded
Residues
versus Intact Suberins
In order to obtain a more reliable
and comprehensive view of the molecular constituents of the periderm
biopolymers, soluble depolymerization products and insoluble depolymerization
residues were considered in concert. The CPMAS spectra in Figure 5A show a native periderm residue that demonstrates
significant removal of the aliphatic chain moieties (∼25–35
ppm) and multiply bonded functional groups (110–150 ppm), in
agreement with prior reports.[13,33] Consistent data are
obtained for replicate biological samples, with the trends confirmed
quantitatively by DPMAS spectral acquisition (Figure S5). The preferential retention of rigid (CH2) resonances at 33 ppm, reported recently
for river birch (Betula nigra) bark
suberan,[14] was not observed for these undegraded
suberin residues. The removal of most aliphatic chain moieties from
the insoluble polymer composite is expected in light of the abundant
18:1 ω-hydroxyacids and α,ω-diacids reported among
the soluble transesterification products, but the retention of significant
peak intensity in the COO region (∼172 ppm) could be attributable
to aliphatic esters or polysaccharideuronic acids[62] that can possibly resist this depolymerization treatment.
Figure 5
CPMAS 13C NMR (150 MHz) spectra of wild-type and genetically
modified native periderms and their undegraded solid residues after
methanolysis.
CPMAS 13Cn class="Chemical">NMR (150 MHz) spectra of wild-type and genetically
modified native periderms and their undegraded solid residues after
methanolysis.
For the corresponding
wound suberin shown in Figure 5B, long-chain
aliphatics contribute modestly to the spectrum
of the intact suberin and are further diminished in the undegraded
residue, following the same qualitative trend as native suberin (Figure 5A) and as reported previously.[12] In addition to retention of the carboxylates, the aromatic
resonances are largely retained in the solid-state 13CNMR spectrum of the undegraded wound suberin residue (Figure 5B).The recalcitrant residues from native
wild-type, StKCS6-RNAi, CYP86A33-RNAi,
and FHT-RNAi suberin each display 13CNMR spectra with
attenuated (CH2) NMR signals
and prominent oxygenated aliphaticcarbon resonances. For the StKCS6-RNAi
(Figure 5C) and CYP86A33-RNAi (Figure 5D), aromatic constituents are nearly gone and carboxyl
signals are partially attenuated as described for the native wild-type
residue. Finally, Figure 5E shows significant
signal intensity remaining in all regions of the 13CNMR
spectrum for the FHT-RNAi suberin residue. Whereas for wild-type,
StKCS6-RNAi, and CYP86A33-RNAi the undegraded residues are dominated
by alkoxy carbon resonances attributable primarily to polysaccharides,
the FHT-RNAi residue maintains a suberin-like character: carboxyl,
arene, and alkene moieties are evident as is a broadened distribution
of chain-methylene resonances. This substantial retention of aromatic
resonances supports significant contributions of the aromatic suberin
domain to the high aromatic content found in FHT-RNAi intact suberin
(Figure 4C) and is in accord with the qualitative
spectral variations noted between 92 and 160 ppm (Figure 2).Taken together, these findings directly
demonstrate the efficacy
of chemical hydrolysis for esters located putatively in the aliphatic
domain of wild-type, StKCS6-RNAi, and CYP86A33-RNAi periderms. Moreover,
the substantial spectral features in the chemical shift range between
60 and 180 ppm indicate oxygenated aliphatics, multiply bonded moieties,
and carboxylates retained in the undegraded solid residue and support
the preservation of both polysaccharides and an aromatic suberin domain
that are architecturally inaccessible to hydrolytic attack and/or
rich in other nonhydrolyzable structures. For FHT-RNAi periderms,
however, the retention of significant 13CNMR signal intensity
in all spectral regions is an unexpected finding.
Site-Specific Flexibility and Overall Periderm
Resilience: Rapid Local Motions and Cooperative Slow Motions
As noted previously, the significant differences in permeability
and resistance to infection of protective plant coverings are expected
to reflect their supramolecular architectures, intercomponent packing
efficiencies, and cracking tendencies.[22,28,37,38,44,61,63−66] Thus, measurements of alkyl chain flexibility were undertaken as
a proxy for periderm resiliency and a prelude to tests of mechanical
performance.The fraction of “liquid-like” aliphatic
chains in the wild-type native and genetically modified periderms
was estimated by comparing DPMAS13CNMR signal intensities
of the mobile portion (low-power 1H decoupling) with the
entire (CH2) population (high-power
decoupling). These measurements report on the prevalence of rapid
local segmental motions at resonance frequencies of ∼108–109 s–1. Roughly 35–40%
of the chain methylenes are highly mobile for both wild-type and StKCS6-RNAi
periderms (Figure 4D), tracking their similar
alkoxy-to-bulk methylene ratios and hydrophilic–hydrophobic
balance (Figure 4A,B). These mobile fractions
match reports for tomato cutin,[61] but they
are double the values obtained for potato wound periderm using a different
analytical protocol.[28] By contrast, although
the FHT-RNAi and CYP86A33-RNAi chain methylenes are diminished in
number compared with other structural moieties (Figure 4A–C), ∼50–60% of them have “liquid-like”
flexibility in the context of solid-state NMR (Figure 4D). Comparative flexibility assessments of the cross-polarizable
chain methylenes were also obtained from the delayed decoupling spectra
(Figure S2), for which signal intensities
of rigid protonated carbons are suppressed but mobile protonated carbons
are preferentially retained together with nonprotonated carbons if 1H–13C dipolar interactions are partially
averaged by molecular motion. Both mobile and rigid alkyl chain components
(30 and 33 ppm, respectively) appear in wild-type as well as in all
of the genetically modified periderms, most prominently in the CYP86A33-RNAi
periderm for which lamellar structure is absent.For the major
“solid-like” (comparatively rigid)
carbon fractions that can be cross polarized in 13CNMR
experiments, spin relaxation measurements were used to compare flexibility
within the aliphatic domain for wild-type (native and wound) and FHT-RNAi
periderms. Figure 6 summarizes the spin–lattice
relaxation time T1(C) values that reflect
nanosecond segmental molecular flexibilities (∼108–109 s–1) across the spectrum
of molecular sites and have been related to the bulk modulus and other
mechanical properties of solid polymers.[67] Each periderm exhibits efficient local motion (short spin–lattice
relaxation times) for (CH2) groups (30 and 33 ppm) but substantial rigidity for CH2O groups (62–64 ppm) and CHO (72 ppm) moieties. These site-specific
variations are in accord with prior spin relaxation measurements for
wound periderm.[28] Among the (CH2) resonances, noticeably longer values
of T1(C) (fewer nanosecond motions) are
also evident at the 33 ppm carbon sites in each sample, for which
environmental and motional variations have been taken to indicate
proximity to polyester–polysaccharide anchoring sites[24,28] or ordered aliphatic suberan chains that resist chemical depolymerization.[14] As deduced above from the DPMAS spectra that
report on all carbons in the periderm samples, the cross-polarizable
carbon fraction at 33 ppm has lengthened values of T1(C) that are indicative of more rigid aliphatic chains;
this trend is especially pronounced for FHT-RNAi (Figure 6). On the other hand, the primarily polysaccharide
moieties (62–64 and 72 ppm) exhibit moderately diminished local
flexibility (longer values of T1(C)) for
both the native wild-type and FHT-RNAi with respect to wound periderm
samples (Figure 6).
Figure 6
NMR spin relaxation times
for native and wound-healing wild-type
(Desirée) potato periderms. (A) 13C spin–lattice
relaxation times, T1(C), for functional
groups including long-chain aliphatics (30 and 33 ppm), CH2O (62–64 ppm), and CHO (72 ppm). (B) Rotating-frame spin relaxation
times, T1ρ(H), measured using an
∼90 kHz Lee–Goldburg (LG) spin-lock field via the respective
attached carbons with chemical shifts as noted above. Additional measurements
with a LG spin-lock field of ∼106 kHz are shown in Figure S6.
NMR spin relaxation times
for native and wound-healing wild-type
(Desirée) potato periderms. (A) 13C spin–lattice
relaxation times, T1(C), for functional
groups including long-chain aliphatics (30 and 33 ppm), CH2O (62–64 ppm), and CHO (72 ppm). (B) Rotating-frame spin relaxation
times, T1ρ(H), measured using an
∼90 kHz Lee–Goldburg (LG) spin-lock field via the respective
attached carbons with chemical shifts as noted above. Additional measurements
with a LG spin-lock field of ∼106 kHz are shown in Figure S6.Finally, wild-type and FHT-RNAi native and wound periderms
were
compared in terms of the slower microsecond cooperative molecular
motions (∼105 s–1) that have been
correlated with impact strength or toughness in synthetic polymers.[68] Contrary to the trends observed for T1(C), Figure 6B reveals
fewer microsecond molecular motions (longer values of T1ρ(H)) for alkyl chain sites (30 and 33 ppm) in
the native wild-type and FHT-RNAi periderms compared to wild-type
wound periderm. The disparity in rotating-frame spin relaxation times
that reflect collective motions is particularly clear for the semicrystalline
33 ppm (CH2) groups. The CH2O (62–64 ppm) and CHO (72 ppm) moieties, which are
largely retained in the undegraded residues and primarily polysaccharide
in character, reorient similarly on this slower (microsecond) time
scale in wild-type native and wound periderms; FHT-RNAi exhibits relatively
higher T1ρ(H) values indicating
somewhat less efficient motions for CH2O groups that are
retained preferentially with respect to CHO moieties in the undegraded
residue spectrum (Figure S5). Taken together,
the spin relaxation data demonstrate flexibility variations that depend
on the periderm sample, which time scale is probed, and which polymeric
constituent is considered.
Mechanical Performance of
Genetically Modified
Periderm Membranes
Genetically modified potato plants provide
effective investigative probes of the individual contributions of
the suberin components to the mechanical performance of the periderm.
Therefore, uniform strips of undewaxed wild-type and genetically modified
periderms were subjected to tensile strength challenges by pulling
at a constant rate until failure using a dynamic mechanical analyzer.
Once broken, the strips were inspected at their surfaces and fracture
sites by SEM (Figure 7).
Figure 7
SEM images of native
periderm membranes isolated from wild-type
and genetically modified potatoes observed after tensile breaking
stress: (A–C) wild-type periderm; (D–F) StKCS6-RNAi
periderm; (G–I) CYP86A33-RNAi periderm; (J–L) FHT-RNAi
periderm. The inner surface strained periderm (left column), its magnification
(center column), and the fracture site (right column) are shown. White
arrows indicate fissures along cell walls by cell edges that are abundant
in the CYP86A33-RNAi periderm (H) and black-filled arrows fissures
across cell walls typical of FHT-RNAi periderm (K). Note the abundant
wax granules in the internal surface (H, arrowheads) and the indentation
of the cross-sectioned cell walls at the site of fracture of the CYP86A33-RNAi
periderm (H).
SEM images of native
periderm membranes isolated from wild-type
and genetically modified potatoes observed after tensile breaking
stress: (A–C) wild-type periderm; (D–F) StKCS6-RNAi
periderm; (G–I) CYP86A33-RNAi periderm; (J–L) FHT-RNAi
periderm. The inner surface strained periderm (left column), its magnification
(center column), and the fracture site (right column) are shown. White
arrows indicate fissures along cell walls by cell edges that are abundant
in the CYP86A33-RNAi periderm (H) and black-filled arrows fissures
across cell walls typical of FHT-RNAi periderm (K). Note the abundant
wax granules in the internal surface (H, arrowheads) and the indentation
of the cross-sectioned cell walls at the site of fracture of the CYP86A33-RNAi
periderm (H).When subjected to tension,
the periderm strips from StKCS6-RNAi
behaved similarly to wild-type, while those from CYP86A33-RNAi and
FHT-RNAi showed lower strain capacity (54 and 72%, respectively) and
failed at lower loads. Microscopic inspection of wild-type periderm
(Figure 7A,B) showed good dimensional recovery
of the cells after stress relief. A similar recovery was observed
for StKCS6-RNAi periderm (Figure 7D,E). In
contrast, CYP86A33-RNAi and FHT-RNAi showed incomplete recovery with
some breakage of their surfaces. After stress relief, the CYP86A33-RNAi
periderm strips displayed a more folded appearance at the cell edges,
with breakages occurring mostly along the cell walls by cell edges
(Figure 7G,H, white arrows). Because unsuberized
cell walls were removed by cellulase and pectinase before making these
measurements, this CYP86A33-RNAi breakage behavior may indicate thinner
and more heterogeneous suberin walls. Finally, FHT-RNAi strips showed
breakages with straight edges that were mostly across the cell wall
surface (Figure 7J,K, black arrows), suggesting
a stiffer cell wall material.Upon inspection of the cross sectioned
cell walls at the fracture
site, again StKCS6-RNAi showed no differences from wild-type (Figure 7C,F); both materials displayed thin and smooth cell
walls. For CYP86A33-RNAi, cross-sectioned cell walls exhibited characteristic
indentations (Figure 7I, black arrowhead),
suggesting a grained disposition of the suberin in accordance with
the altered ultrastructural lamellation of this periderm (Table 1). However, it should be noted that in this case
a number of wax granules deposited on the cell wall surface (Figure 7H, white arrowhead) may mask the image of the wall
sections. As previously described (Table 1)
the FHT-RNAi periderm is much thicker than wild-type as it accumulates
more phellem cell layers, which are found to be collapsed in the tension-fractured
periderm strips (Figure 7L).
Discussion
Critical Evaluation of the Investigative Approach
An
important goal at the outset of the current study was the rigorous
validation of solid-state 13Cnuclear magnetic resonance
(ssNMR) and FT-IR as reliable, nondestructive spectroscopic techniques
that can probe the macromolecular organization of suberin–polysaccharide
cell wall composites in plant periderms comprehensively. Likewise,
the current study confirms the use of genetically modified suberins
as an effective tool to elucidate the fundamental basis for their
micromechanical and physiological properties.All native, wound,
and genetically modified suberins show the functional groups typical
of a suberized tissue[9,21,23,24,27,69] in their CPMAS 13CNMR spectra (Figure 1), and this conclusion is supported by complementary
FT-IR data for wild-type and FHT-RNAi samples (Figure S4). Biological replicates demonstrate the excellent
reproducibility of the NMR spectroscopic results, indicating the robustness
of the analyses (Figures S1 and S3). For
instance, CPMAS spectra of the native potato periderms (cv. Desirée)
show dominant peaks assigned to aliphatic chains at 30 and 33 ppm,
followed by intense resonances from the polysaccharide and polyester-based
alkoxy carbons (Figure 1); wound periderms
displayed the aliphatic chain features (0–45 ppm) but with
diminished intensity. The DPMASNMR spectra, though requiring substantial
acquisition times, provide quantitative estimates of carbon-based
molecular composition that are representative of the entire polymer
composite (Figure 2).Finally, spin relaxation
data supplement determinations of the
type and relative number of functional groups with site-specific assessments
of molecular flexibility on contrasting and complementary time scales.
The motional parameters have well-established links to the mechanical
properties of diverse synthetic and natural polymer composites.[71] For instance, local segmental motions at nanosecond
frequencies have been correlated with the bulk modulus of both synthetic
polyesters and protective plant biopolymers from lime and tomato cutin
as well as potato wound suberin,[28,64,66,67] providing a precedent
for the use of ssNMR to establish structure-dynamics-function correlations
in other biomacromolecular assemblies. For cutins and suberins, motions
occurring at the spin-lock frequency in rotating-frame nuclear relaxation
measurements have been proposed, in analogy with engineered polymers,
to reflect the impact strength or toughness of biopolymer-based plant
coverings.[22,28,66,68] Although prior assessments of microsecond
motions have been limited by poor NMR sensitivity and nonexponential
decays (for T1ρ(C)) or averaging
of values by spin diffusion (for ⟨T1ρ(H)⟩),[72] the Lee–Goldburg
(LG) spin-lock procedure used herein preserves site-specific information
while allowing practical measurement of T1ρ(H)s through the 13Cs directly bound to the respective 1H nuclei.[52] The distinct values
observed via each carbon signal show variations for native (wild-type
and FHT-RNAi) and wound periderms that all track the previously reported
⟨T1ρ(C)⟩ trends for
potato wound suberin.[28]
Suberized Cell Walls and Permeability Function
in Native versus Wound Periderm Assemblies
As noted above,
the biopolymers in native and wound periderm exhibit 13CNMR spectra with comparable types of functional groups (Figure 1). However, the primarily polysaccharide alkoxy
groups outnumber the (CH2) carbons for the polyester in wound periderm, whereas the aliphatic
chain carbons appear dominant in spectra of the native suberized cell
walls (Figure 2). Consequently, the wound periderm
is rich in water-loving moieties as judged by the ratio of alkoxy
to alkyl chain moieties (Figure 3A), a reasonable
finding in light of its hundredfold larger permeability.[34] A sparse (CH2) population in the wound periderm could compromise hydrophobic
interactions with waxes that are required to form a blend with good
sealing performance, as also discussed below for the FHT-RNAi and
CYP86A33-RNAi periderms.With regard to the multiply bonded
carbon-containing groups, our NMR spectra show that they outnumber
the (CH2) groups in wound
periderm, but the relative proportions are roughly reversed for native
samples (Figure 3). This relative abundance
of arene and alkene moieties in wound periderm is compatible with
prior solid-state NMR and histological evidence that aromatic structures
assemble prior to their aliphatic counterparts during suberization.[30,73] Though observation of a common set of aromatic resonances and similar
CH/C ratios derived from the 13CNMR spectra of native
(Figure S2) and wound[9] periderms suggest comparable molecular organization of
their suberins, thioacidolysis breakdown products[36] indicate that syringyl or sinapyl units are more dominant
in wound tissues. The multiply bonded (aromatic) chemical groups are
also retained to a greater degree in the undegraded residue from wound
periderm (Figures 5A,B), suggesting they have
fewer covalent (ester) attachments to the degradable aliphatic polyester
groups, a greater fraction of nonester bonds to the cell walls, and
a location within the macromolecular assembly that is inaccessible
to the methanolysis reagent.In addition to the compositional
trends observed for the wound
periderm, there are notable alterations in molecular flexibility that
can be evaluated in site-specific and time scale-specific terms to
gain insights into macromolecular architecture and periderm function.
Compared with native wild-type and FHT-RNAi samples, polyester acyl
chains in the wound periderm display augmented cooperative microsecond
motions that facilitate efficient rotating-frame spin relaxation (shorter T1ρ(H) values), notably for the semicrystalline
(CH2) groups (33 ppm; Figure 6). In wound periderm, the primarily polyesteroxymethylene
groups (62–64 ppm) and largely polysaccharide oxymethine groups
(72 ppm) also show relatively enhanced local segmental nanosecond
motions (shorter values of T1(C); Figure 6). The paucity of (CH2) groups produced by wound suberin thus results in formation
of a macromolecular assembly for which only the most rigid subset
of long-chain segments is “loosened”, suggesting that
anchoring constraints have become less prevalent. For both groups
of alkoxy moieties (62–64 and 72 ppm), restricted motion on
both microsecond and nanosecond time scales can be attributed to contributions
from polysaccharides or cross-linked aliphatic suberan constituents
that are inaccessible to methanolysis. For wound periderms, in particular,
alkoxy segmental motions are notably less constrained, again in accord
with a model in which polyester–polysaccharide anchors are
absent. These observations suggest that, in addition to sufficient
(CH2) groups to form a hydrophobic
seal with periderm waxes, a robust barrier to water transpiration
requires the rigidity and organized suprastructure typical of native
periderms.[34] The spin relaxation findings
also underscore the importance of flexibility on two time scales and
the distinct roles of polyester and polysaccharide constituents in
determining plant periderm protective functions.
Recalcitrant Suberan Biopolymer Fraction
In analogy to the
nonsaponifiable cutan biopolymers derived from
plant cutins and soil organic matter,[21,74−76] we designate suberan as the insoluble residue that persists in transesterified
plant suberins[12−14,33,77] because its covalent linkages are inaccessible or chemically unreactive
with respect to the customary degradative reagents. Whereas a subset
of cutans occur in conjunction with polysaccharides from the underlying
cell walls, many of these materials have been identified as fatty
acid esters and some depolymerization residues have been reported
to possess ether, alcohol, carboxylic acid, epoxy, phenolic, or semicrystalline
polyethylene functional groups.[21,74−76] For depolymerization-resistant suberans, such structural comparisons
are complicated by differences in sample source, chemical treatment
history, breakdown efficiency, and spectroscopic characterization
methodology. For instance, the recalcitrant residues from chemical
transesterification have been reported to comprise 50–90% by
weight of the starting periderm tissues for potatoes and birch bark.[12−14,33] Thus, in addition to arguing
for caution in the analysis of soluble breakdown product profiles,
the partial extent of depolymerization for suberized plant cell walls
limits the scope of our proposals regarding suberan molecular structure.The solid-state 13CNMR spectra of Figures 5 and S5 show that undegraded
residues from all potato periderm samples studied herein are composed
predominantly of polysaccharides, as reported previously for both
native[13,33] and wound[12] materials.
Except for FHT-RNAi periderm, the ssNMR spectra evidence small proportions
of retained aliphatic chain moieties, suggesting that the amount and
chemical composition of aliphatic ester monomer constituents can be
determined reliably for potato periderm from their respective soluble
depolymerization product mixtures. The depolymerization left residues
that show significant 13CNMR spectral contributions from
ester or uronic acidcarboxyl groups (∼172 ppm), but our failure
to observe commensurate (CH2) and COO removal strongly suggests retention of suberans that are
structurally distinct from the polyester structure usually attributed
to suberin. Although a glycerol-based polyester model[5] has been advanced for Betula nigra suberan,[14] the modest extent of suberin
breakdown and the presence of dominant polysaccharide resonances in
the same 60–80 ppm alkoxy region of the CPMAS 13CNMR spectrum make this hypothesis difficult to evaluate.A more comprehensive molecular specification of the recalcitrant
fractions is possible by considering the CYP86A33-RNAi and FHT-RNAi
periderms, which represent two contrasting profiles of saponifiable
aliphatics, ultrastructural organization, and ssNMR signature. CYP86A33-RNAi
periderm shows a 43% reduction (μg mg–1) in
soluble transesterification products, less organized suberin lamellae,
and a deficiency in the major bifunctional monomers (C18:1 ω-hydroxyacid
and α,ω-diacid).[44] However,
Figure 5 shows that the CYP86A33-RNAi recalcitrant
residue retains similar (small) proportions of aliphatic groups to
wild-type, suggesting that they have a common aliphatic suberan polymer
that coexists with the saponifiable material within the intact suberized
cell walls.[14]Conversely, the FHT-RNAi
periderm has a knocked-down capacity to
synthesize alkyl ferulates but retains the lamellar organization of
its suberized cell walls.[38] As compared
with the wild-type, this periderm shows 89% reductions (μg mg–1) in both esterified ferulic acid and C18:1 ω-hydroxyacid,[38] which are found together as an esterified soluble
product upon partial transesterification of the wild-type potatosuberin.[10] With this esterification suppressed genetically,
a finding of increased conjugated polyamines has suggested redirection
of the unesterified free feruloyl-CoA pool to soluble phenolics,[38] though the fate of the C18:1 ω-hydroxyacid
is uncertain. Figure 5 demonstrates a striking
increase in the nonsaponifiable aliphatic and aromatic fractions for
FHT-RNAi as compared with wild-type and CYP86A33-RNAi. The former
periderm’s ferulic acid processing could produce a more heavily
cross-linked aromatic domain (see next section) that is thus less
accessible to depolymerization. Alternatively or additionally, ω-hydroxyacid
could be incorporated in nonester forms that leave it behind as aliphatic
FHT-RNAi suberan after the transesterification treatment. The proposal
of ferulic acid reprocessing is also consistent with the elevated
aromatic/(CH2) ratio displayed
in Figure 4 for the intact suberin macromolecular
cell-wall assembly.Taking into account these several considerations,
our findings
support the hypothesis that suberan is a distinct biopolymer that
coexists with suberin. In potato periderm this fraction can be produced
even if C18:1 ω-hydroxyacid and α,ω-diacid levels
are compromised by RNAi silencing, suggesting that other synthesized
compounds could be incorporated into the suberan macromolecular assembly.
Our results also suggest that ferulate esters are not required for
suberan formation, but the undegraded FHT-RNAi residue displays a
distinctive chemical structure. Nonetheless, these facts do not preclude
the possibility that suberan is derived from suberin, as reported
for cutan and cutin.[78,79] Finally, our results suggest
that suberan is not directly related to the lamellar organization
of suberin, and therefore, other structural or enzymatic factors are
likely required to establish the lamellae.[6]
Molecular Basis for Physicochemical Properties
of Genetically Modified Suberin Macromolecular Assemblies
When pulled to the limit of their strength, the periderm membranes
with genetically modified suberins behaved differently from each other.
In general, the mechanical properties of macromolecules can be related
to the length, flexibility, stereoregularity, and cross-linking of
the polymer chains, while transport properties such as diffusivity
depend on how rapidly molecules can move through the polymer matrix.[80]The StKCS6-deficient periderm has a similar
total transesterified lipid amount and composition to wild-type and
exhibits the typical ordered periderm lamellae, though it exhibits
modestly shorter carbon lengths as expected and increased permeability.
Moreover, ssNMR analysis of the intact polymer (Figures 1, 2, and 4)
and the undegraded residue (Figure 5) revealed
similar molecular composition and architecture to the wild-type. Our
measurements of tensile stress creep deformation for the StKCS6-RNAi
membranes (Figure 7) did not reveal differences
from wild-type.In contrast, the CYP86A33-RNAi periderm exhibited
lower tensile
strength and higher plasticity than the wild-type periderm (Figure 7). The much lower amounts of transesterified aliphaticsuberin that characterize this periderm include compositional profiles
with significantly larger proportions of monofunctional lipids (fatty
acids and fatty alcohols) in relation to bifunctional lipids (ω-hydroxyacids
and α,ω-diacids) and glycerol (Table 1). Given the completeness of aliphatic chain removal evidenced
by the ssNMR spectra of Figure 5, this monomer
composition can be interpreted to imply a greatly reduced degree of
cross-linking capacity within the polyester matrix[6,44] and
is supported by the enhanced fraction of mobile (CH2) groups displayed in Figure 4D. The reduction in cross-linking capability could also impart
a less regular internal organization to the polymer composite, as
exemplified by the uneven distribution of electron-dense and electron-translucent
material in the suberin wall.[44] In turn,
diminished polymer–polymer interactions could account for the
lower tensile strength and grained appearance of ruptured CYP86A33-RNAi
cell walls (Figure 7F).The shift in
hydrophilic–hydrophobic balance for CYP86A33-RNAi
periderms, established by ssNMR results showing a lowered proportion
of aliphatic chains in relation to alkoxy and carboxyl functional
groups (Figure 4A,B), gives this periderm more
affinity and capacity for interactions with water. The expected reductions
in hydrophobic chain–chain interactions are consistent with
observation of a slightly elevated fraction of mobile (CH2) groups (Figure 4D). These properties are both compatible with the 3.5-fold larger
permeability observed for the CYP86A33-RNAi periderm[44] and are reasonable because a substandard chain-methylene
population could compromise formation of a polyester-wax seal. Although
the aromatic carbon ssNMR spectral features are similar for CYP86A33-RNAi
and wild-type periderms, the genetically modified periderm shows an
enhanced ratio of aromatics to aliphatic chains (Figure 4C). Considering that the covalent anchoring and cross-linking
of suberin to cell walls are attributed to the aromatic groups,[4,9] the CYP86A33-RNAi periderms might be expected to recover their dimensional
integrity after stress relief, whereas in fact we observe a more plastic
behavior. Thus, we attribute the viscoelastic properties of this periderm
to the impaired aliphatic domain organization, following analogous
hypotheses advanced to rationalize plastic contributions to extensibility
in tomato cuticular materials[82] and compositionally
linked variations in the elasticity and relaxation properties of cork
stoppers.[3]Finally, the FHT-RNAi
periderm showed lower tensile strength but
greater stiffness than wild-type (Figure 7).
This modified biopolymer membrane is thicker, more brittle, prone
to cracks, russeted in appearance, and 15-fold more permeable to water
compared with the wild-type. Moreover, FHT-RNAi carries a 62% smaller
total suberinlipid load (μg mg–1) compared
to the wild-type periderm (Table 1).[38] It should be noted that, although ∼89%
(μg mg–1) fewer ferulate esters are released
as soluble depolymerization products (as expected due to FHT silencing),
new related conjugated polyamine compounds (feruloyl and caffeoyl
putrescine, feruloyltyramine and octopamine) are produced.[38] Thus, we surmise that ferulic acid is redirected
to other biosynthetic pathways so that the suberized cell wall is
“rebuilt” as a stiffer periderm that exhibits increased
permeability and lower tensile strength. This hypothesis is supported
by an elevated aromatic/(CH2) ratio (Figure 4) and less efficient μs
and ns motions (Figure 6), but the likely incorporation
of new types of polyphenolics that are uniquely retained in the aromatic
fraction of the FHT-RNAi undegraded residue (Figure 5) makes it unwise to attempt direct comparisons of these group
ratios with other periderms. Conjugated polyamines are thought to
serve many roles, including cell-wall reinforcement through the formation
of ferulic acid bridges[83] that have been
related to the increase in thermal stability of the cell wall[84,85] and to changes in texture and stiffness of plant tissues.[86,87] Increases in feruloyl amides have been correlated with lesion formation
in common scab-infected potato tubers,[88,89] which have
heavier and more brittle skin similar to that of FHT-RNAi potatoes.
Besides, insufficient flexibility has been proposed to promote cracking
of the polymeric veneer of fruit cuticles that increases water permeability.[22,66] Viewed together, it seems reasonable to attribute the greater stiffness
and more brittle texture of the FHT-RNAi periderm to the redirection
of ferulic acid moieties so that ordered stacking is favored rather
than esterification to alkyl chains. Although the chain (CH2) groups exhibit similar nanosecond
motions to wild-type periderm (Figure 6), a
greater fraction of them are “liquidlike” (Figure 4D) and presumably less tethered by other cell-wall
constituents. These observations underscore the point that anomalous
functionality (e.g., waterproofing ability or microfissuring susceptibility)
is unlikely to reside entirely in the suberin properties but must
also reflect intercomponent interactions with waxes and cell walls.The elevated (CHO + CH2O + CH3O)/(CH2) ratio (Figure 4A) and enhanced hydrogen-bonded OH stretching absorbance (Figure S4) both indicate a more hydrophilic FHT-RNAi
periderm that can facilitate water transpiration, but as for the aromatic/(CH2) ratio, the NMR-based correlation
is qualitative: a similar ratio is found for the CYP86A33-RNAi periderm
even though it shows only a 3.5-fold increase in permeability. The
correspondence between sparse but disproportionately flexible chain
methylenes (Figure 6) and facile water transpiration
in the FHT-RNAi assembly can be explained if chain packing is disrupted
by oxygen-linked branches, though steric hindrance could limit the
observation of the corresponding transesterifcation products. Conversely,
the relative decrease in suberin chain methylenes by 62% (μg
mg–1), which is accompanied by an unremarkable wax
content (∼5.4 μg mg–1),[38] can produce a numerical mismatch between their
respective chains that undercuts the hydrophobic association and motional
restriction typical of a robust cuticular waterproofing layer.[66] Given that esterification to ferulic acid is
dramatically attenuated in the FHT-RNAi periderm, the potential long-chain
aliphatic “partners” should be more loosely anchored
in the modified suberin assembly, highly mobile (Figure 4D), and present in a chemical form that is less susceptible
to degradative breakdown (Figure 5).
Conclusions
In summary, a coordinated set of ssNMR, FT-IR, and tensile strength
measurements has provided atomic-level insights into the structure–dynamics–function
relationships of an agriculturally important biomacromolecular assembly
and has offered guidance for the engineering of other polymer-based
waterproofing materials. Wound-healing suberized potato cell walls,
which are 2 orders of magnitude more permeable to water than native
periderms, are found to have a strikingly reduced proportion of alkyl
chain moieties that enhance their hydrophilic–hydrophobic balance,
an aromatic domain more resistant to chemical degradation, and more
flexible molecular groupings that could reflect a less organized periderm
supramolecular structure. Genetically modified potato periderms provide
a means to examine the structural and functional consequences of designed
metabolic alterations, wherein a comprehensive view is obtained by
coordinating information from intact periderms, soluble depolymerization
products, and undegraded residues. For StKCS6-RNAi periderms in which
chain elongation is modestly diminished, these studies reveal similar
molecular composition, mechanical performance, and permeability to
wild-type. In CYP86A33-RNAi periderms for which terminal fatty acid
hydroxylation and cross-linking capacity are knocked down, the results
are a greater fraction of mobile alkyl chains, loss of lamellar structure,
and enhanced permeability. Moreover, downregulation of ferulate ester
formation in FHT-RNAi potatoes remodels the periderm with more flexible
aliphatic chains but abundant aromatic constituents that are resistant
to transesterifcation; this modification also attenuates cooperative
motions at the junctures between hydroxyfatty acid units and produces
a periderm that is mechanically compromised and highly permeable to
water. In terms of mechanical performance, changes in the aliphatic
domain impacted viscoelastic properties, whereas changes in the aromatics
controlled mechanical strength and resiliency.Overall, the
architecture of suberin with respect to associated
cell-wall polymers and waxes gives the potato periderm its unique
strength, elasticity, and impermeability. The structure of each aliphatic
and aromatic suberin domain, as well as networked interactions among
acyl chains, aromatic rings, polysaccharides, and waxy coatings, is
necessary to achieve the micromechanical and protective properties
of this periderm biopolymer assembly. As demonstrated herein, both
structure and function are responsive to whether native or wound periderms
are synthesized by the plant and if key genes are suppressed in the
native periderms. A delicate balance among these compositional, supramolecular,
and motional properties of the suberized cell walls is essential to
maintain periderm functionality as a barrier to water transpiration
with excellent mechanical integrity.
Authors: Tal Isaacson; Dylan K Kosma; Antonio J Matas; Gregory J Buda; Yonghua He; Bingwu Yu; Arika Pravitasari; James D Batteas; Ruth E Stark; Matthew A Jenks; Jocelyn K C Rose Journal: Plant J Date: 2009-07-06 Impact factor: 6.417
Authors: Subhasish Chatterjee; Antonio J Matas; Tal Isaacson; Cindie Kehlet; Jocelyn K C Rose; Ruth E Stark Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2015-12-24 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Keyvan Dastmalchi; Linda Kallash; Isabel Wang; Van C Phan; Wenlin Huang; Olga Serra; Ruth E Stark Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 5.279