Literature DB >> 24501090

An energetic scale for equilibrium H/D fractionation factors illuminates hydrogen bond free energies in proteins.

Zheng Cao1, James U Bowie.   

Abstract

Equilibrium H/D fractionation factors have been extensively employed to qualitatively assess hydrogen bond strengths in protein structure, enzyme active sites, and DNA. It remains unclear how fractionation factors correlate with hydrogen bond free energies, however. Here we develop an empirical relationship between fractionation factors and free energy, allowing for the simple and quantitative measurement of hydrogen bond free energies. Applying our empirical relationship to prior fractionation factor studies in proteins, we find: [1] Within the folded state, backbone hydrogen bonds are only marginally stronger on average in α-helices compared to β-sheets by ∼0.2 kcal/mol. [2] Charge-stabilized hydrogen bonds are stronger than neutral hydrogen bonds by ∼2 kcal/mol on average, and can be as strong as -7 kcal/mol. [3] Changes in a few hydrogen bonds during an enzyme catalytic cycle can stabilize an intermediate state by -4.2 kcal/mol. [4] Backbone hydrogen bonds can make a large overall contribution to the energetics of conformational changes, possibly playing an important role in directing conformational changes. [5] Backbone hydrogen bonding becomes more uniform overall upon ligand binding, which may facilitate participation of the entire protein structure in events at the active site. Our energetic scale provides a simple method for further exploration of hydrogen bond free energies.
© 2014 The Protein Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  backbone hydrogen bond; dynamics; enzyme; hydrogen bond strength; isotope effect

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24501090      PMCID: PMC4005708          DOI: 10.1002/pro.2435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  35 in total

1.  Evaluation of direct and cooperative contributions towards the strength of buried hydrogen bonds and salt bridges.

Authors:  S Albeck; R Unger; G Schreiber
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Method to measure strong protein-protein interactions in lipid bilayers using a steric trap.

Authors:  Heedeok Hong; Tracy M Blois; Zheng Cao; James U Bowie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Membrane protein folding: how important are hydrogen bonds?

Authors:  James U Bowie
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Probing electric fields in proteins in solution by NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Mathias A S Hass; Malene Ringkjøbing Jensen; Jens J Led
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-07

5.  Energetics of protein hydrogen bonds.

Authors:  C Nick Pace
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 15.369

6.  Detection of the sulfhydryl groups in proteins with slow hydrogen exchange rates and determination of their proton/deuteron fractionation factors using the deuterium-induced effects on the 13C(beta) NMR signals.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Takeda; JunGoo Jee; Tsutomu Terauchi; Masatsune Kainosho
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Tyrosine hydrogen bonds make a large contribution to protein stability.

Authors:  C N Pace; G Horn; E J Hebert; J Bechert; K Shaw; L Urbanikova; J M Scholtz; J Sevcik
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Energetics of the interaction between water and the helical peptide group and its role in determining helix propensities.

Authors:  F Avbelj; P Luo; R L Baldwin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Toward quantification of protein backbone-backbone hydrogen bonding energies: An energetic analysis of an amide-to-ester mutation in an alpha-helix within a protein.

Authors:  Jianmin Gao; Jeffery W Kelly
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Localized thermodynamic coupling between hydrogen bonding and microenvironment polarity substantially stabilizes proteins.

Authors:  Jianmin Gao; Daryl A Bosco; Evan T Powers; Jeffery W Kelly
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 15.369

View more
  8 in total

1.  Backbone Hydrogen Bond Energies in Membrane Proteins Are Insensitive to Large Changes in Local Water Concentration.

Authors:  Henry J Lessen; Ananya Majumdar; Karen G Fleming
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 2.  Forces stabilizing proteins.

Authors:  C Nick Pace; J Martin Scholtz; Gerald R Grimsley
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 3.  How physical forces drive the process of helical membrane protein folding.

Authors:  Karolina Corin; James U Bowie
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Beyond the Plateau: pL Dependence of Proton Inventories as a Tool for Studying Ribozyme and Ribonuclease Catalysis.

Authors:  Suhyun Yoon; Michael E Harris
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.321

Review 5.  Membrane proteins enter the fold.

Authors:  Dagan C Marx; Karen G Fleming
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 7.786

6.  Mapping the Hydrogen Bond Networks in the Catalytic Subunit of Protein Kinase A Using H/D Fractionation Factors.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Li; Atul K Srivastava; Jonggul Kim; Susan S Taylor; Gianluigi Veglia
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Backbone Hydrogen Bond Strengths Can Vary Widely in Transmembrane Helices.

Authors:  Zheng Cao; James M Hutchison; Charles R Sanders; James U Bowie
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Increased H-Bond Stability Relates to Altered ε-Cleavage Efficiency and Aβ Levels in the I45T Familial Alzheimer's Disease Mutant of APP.

Authors:  Alexander Götz; Philipp Högel; Mara Silber; Iro Chaitoglou; Burkhard Luy; Claudia Muhle-Goll; Christina Scharnagl; Dieter Langosch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.