Literature DB >> 32134659

Backbone Hydrogen Bond Energies in Membrane Proteins Are Insensitive to Large Changes in Local Water Concentration.

Henry J Lessen1, Ananya Majumdar2, Karen G Fleming1.   

Abstract

A hallmark feature of biological lipid bilayer structure is a depth-dependent polarity gradient largely resulting from the change in water concentration over the angstrom length scale. This gradient is particularly steep as it crosses the membrane interfacial regions where the water concentration drops at least a million-fold along the direction of the bilayer normal. Although local water content is often assumed to be a major determinant of membrane protein stability, the effect of the water-induced polarity gradient upon backbone hydrogen bond strength has not been systematically investigated. We addressed this question by measuring the free energy change for a number of backbone hydrogen bonds in the transmembrane protein OmpW. These values were obtained at 33 backbone amides from hydrogen/deuterium fractionation factors by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. We surprisingly found that OmpW backbone hydrogen bond energies do not vary over a wide range of water concentrations that are characteristic of the solvation environment in the bilayer interfacial region. We validated the interpretation of our results by determining the hydrodynamic and solvation properties of our OmpW-micelle complex using analytical ultracentrifugation and molecular dynamics simulations. The magnitudes of the backbone hydrogen bond free energy changes in our study are comparable to those observed in water-soluble proteins, the H-segment of the leader peptidase helix used in the von Heijne and White biological scale experiments, and several interfacial peptides. Our results agree with those reported for the transmembrane α-helical portion of the amyloid precursor protein after the latter values were adjusted for kinetic isotope effects. Overall, our work suggests that backbone hydrogen bonds provide modest thermodynamic stability to membrane protein structures and that many amides are unaffected by dehydration within the bilayer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32134659      PMCID: PMC7610216          DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c00290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  52 in total

1.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD.

Authors:  James C Phillips; Rosemary Braun; Wei Wang; James Gumbart; Emad Tajkhorshid; Elizabeth Villa; Christophe Chipot; Robert D Skeel; Laxmikant Kalé; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Recognition of transmembrane helices by the endoplasmic reticulum translocon.

Authors:  Tara Hessa; Hyun Kim; Karl Bihlmaier; Carolina Lundin; Jorrit Boekel; Helena Andersson; Ingmarie Nilsson; Stephen H White; Gunnar von Heijne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  How many drug targets are there?

Authors:  John P Overington; Bissan Al-Lazikani; Andrew L Hopkins
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Folding of beta-sheet membrane proteins: a hydrophobic hexapeptide model.

Authors:  W C Wimley; K Hristova; A S Ladokhin; L Silvestro; P H Axelsen; S H White
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-04-17       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Structural basis for substrate selection by the translocation and assembly module of the β-barrel assembly machinery.

Authors:  Rebecca S Bamert; Karl Lundquist; Hyea Hwang; Chaille T Webb; Takoya Shiota; Christopher J Stubenrauch; Mathew J Belousoff; Robert J A Goode; Ralf B Schittenhelm; Richard Zimmerman; Martin Jung; James C Gumbart; Trevor Lithgow
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.501

6.  Hydrogen bonding and equilibrium protium-deuterium fractionation factors in the immunoglobulin G binding domain of protein G.

Authors:  D Khare; P Alexander; J Orban
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-03-30       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 7.  Structure of lipid bilayers.

Authors:  J F Nagle; S Tristram-Nagle
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2000-11-10

8.  Folding of amphipathic alpha-helices on membranes: energetics of helix formation by melittin.

Authors:  A S Ladokhin; S H White
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-01-29       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Structural basis for outer membrane lipopolysaccharide insertion.

Authors:  Haohao Dong; Quanju Xiang; Yinghong Gu; Zhongshan Wang; Neil G Paterson; Phillip J Stansfeld; Chuan He; Yizheng Zhang; Wenjian Wang; Changjiang Dong
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 69.504

10.  Backbone Hydrogen Bond Strengths Can Vary Widely in Transmembrane Helices.

Authors:  Zheng Cao; James M Hutchison; Charles R Sanders; James U Bowie
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  How physical forces drive the process of helical membrane protein folding.

Authors:  Karolina Corin; James U Bowie
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 2.  Characterization of the Features of Water Inside the SecY Translocon.

Authors:  Sara Capponi
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 1.843

3.  Local Bilayer Hydrophobicity Modulates Membrane Protein Stability.

Authors:  Dagan C Marx; Karen G Fleming
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 4.  Membrane proteins enter the fold.

Authors:  Dagan C Marx; Karen G Fleming
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 7.786

Review 5.  Role of the lipid bilayer in outer membrane protein folding in Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Jim E Horne; David J Brockwell; Sheena E Radford
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Energetics and structure of alanine-rich α-helices via adaptive steered molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Yi Zhuang; Hailey R Bureau; Christine Lopez; Ryan Bucher; Stephen Quirk; Rigoberto Hernandez
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.033

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.