Literature DB >> 24500173

Complementary ecosystem services provided by pest predators and pollinators increase quantity and quality of coffee yields.

Alice Classen1, Marcell K Peters, Stefan W Ferger, Maria Helbig-Bonitz, Julia M Schmack, Genevieve Maassen, Matthias Schleuning, Elisabeth K V Kalko, Katrin Böhning-Gaese, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter.   

Abstract

Wild animals substantially support crop production by providing ecosystem services, such as pollination and natural pest control. However, the strengths of synergies between ecosystem services and their dependencies on land-use management are largely unknown. Here, we took an experimental approach to test the impact of land-use intensification on both individual and combined pollination and pest control services in coffee production systems at Mount Kilimanjaro. We established a full-factorial pollinator and vertebrate exclosure experiment along a land-use gradient from traditional homegardens (agroforestry systems), shaded coffee plantations to sun coffee plantations (total sample size = 180 coffee bushes). The exclusion of vertebrates led to a reduction in fruit set of ca 9%. Pollinators did not affect fruit set, but significantly increased fruit weight of coffee by an average of 7.4%. We found no significant decline of these ecosystem services along the land-use gradient. Pest control and pollination service were thus complementary, contributing to coffee production by affecting the quantity and quality of a major tropical cash crop across different coffee production systems at Mount Kilimanjaro.

Keywords:  Coffea arabica; Mount Kilimanjaro; agroforestry; biological pest control; land-use change; pollination

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24500173      PMCID: PMC3924087          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  19 in total

1.  Herbivory-mediated pollinator limitation: negative impacts of induced volatiles on plant-pollinator interactions.

Authors:  André Kessler; Rayko Halitschke; Katja Poveda
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production.

Authors:  Taylor H Ricketts; Gretchen C Daily; Paul R Ehrlich; Charles D Michener
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  How much does agriculture depend on pollinators? Lessons from long-term trends in crop production.

Authors:  Marcelo A Aizen; Lucas A Garibaldi; Saul A Cunningham; Alexandra M Klein
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Bats limit arthropods and herbivory in a tropical forest.

Authors:  Margareta B Kalka; Adam R Smith; Elisabeth K V Kalko
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning.

Authors:  Trond H Larsen; Neal M Williams; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 6.  Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security.

Authors:  Riccardo Bommarco; David Kleijn; Simon G Potts
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 7.  Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops.

Authors:  Alexandra-Maria Klein; Bernard E Vaissière; James H Cane; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Saul A Cunningham; Claire Kremen; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance.

Authors:  Lucas A Garibaldi; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Rachael Winfree; Marcelo A Aizen; Riccardo Bommarco; Saul A Cunningham; Claire Kremen; Luísa G Carvalheiro; Lawrence D Harder; Ohad Afik; Ignasi Bartomeus; Faye Benjamin; Virginie Boreux; Daniel Cariveau; Natacha P Chacoff; Jan H Dudenhöffer; Breno M Freitas; Jaboury Ghazoul; Sarah Greenleaf; Juliana Hipólito; Andrea Holzschuh; Brad Howlett; Rufus Isaacs; Steven K Javorek; Christina M Kennedy; Kristin M Krewenka; Smitha Krishnan; Yael Mandelik; Margaret M Mayfield; Iris Motzke; Theodore Munyuli; Brian A Nault; Mark Otieno; Jessica Petersen; Gideon Pisanty; Simon G Potts; Romina Rader; Taylor H Ricketts; Maj Rundlöf; Colleen L Seymour; Christof Schüepp; Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi; Hisatomo Taki; Teja Tscharntke; Carlos H Vergara; Blandina F Viana; Thomas C Wanger; Catrin Westphal; Neal Williams; Alexandra M Klein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  When ecosystem services interact: crop pollination benefits depend on the level of pest control.

Authors:  Ola Lundin; Henrik G Smith; Maj Rundlöf; Riccardo Bommarco
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The value of bees to the coffee harvest.

Authors:  David W Roubik
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  13 in total

1.  Pollinators, pests, and predators: Recognizing ecological trade-offs in agroecosystems.

Authors:  Manu E Saunders; Rebecca K Peisley; Romina Rader; Gary W Luck
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Synergistic interactions of ecosystem services: florivorous pest control boosts crop yield increase through insect pollination.

Authors:  Louis Sutter; Matthias Albrecht
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Biotic predictors complement models of bat and bird responses to climate and tree diversity in European forests.

Authors:  Luc Barbaro; Eric Allan; Evy Ampoorter; Bastien Castagneyrol; Yohan Charbonnier; Hans De Wandeler; Christian Kerbiriou; Harriet T Milligan; Aude Vialatte; Monique Carnol; Marc Deconchat; Pallieter De Smedt; Hervé Jactel; Julia Koricheva; Isabelle Le Viol; Bart Muys; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Kris Verheyen; Fons van der Plas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Interacting pest control and pollination services in coffee systems.

Authors:  Alejandra Martínez-Salinas; Adina Chain-Guadarrama; Natalia Aristizábal; Sergio Vilchez-Mendoza; Rolando Cerda; Taylor H Ricketts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Shade trees preserve avian insectivore biodiversity on coffee farms in a warming climate.

Authors:  Sarah L Schooler; Matthew D Johnson; Peter Njoroge; William T Bean
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Combining Costs and Benefits of Animal Activities to Assess Net Yield Outcomes in Apple Orchards.

Authors:  Manu E Saunders; Gary W Luck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Bee pollination increases yield quantity and quality of cash crops in Burkina Faso, West Africa.

Authors:  Katharina Stein; Drissa Coulibaly; Kathrin Stenchly; Dethardt Goetze; Stefan Porembski; André Lindner; Souleymane Konaté; Eduard K Linsenmair
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Impact of human disturbance on bee pollinator communities in savanna and agricultural sites in Burkina Faso, West Africa.

Authors:  Katharina Stein; Kathrin Stenchly; Drissa Coulibaly; Alain Pauly; Kangbeni Dimobe; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Souleymane Konaté; Dethardt Goetze; Stefan Porembski; K Eduard Linsenmair
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-17       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production.

Authors:  Matteo Dainese; Emily A Martin; Marcelo A Aizen; Matthias Albrecht; Ignasi Bartomeus; Riccardo Bommarco; Luisa G Carvalheiro; Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer; Vesna Gagic; Lucas A Garibaldi; Jaboury Ghazoul; Heather Grab; Mattias Jonsson; Daniel S Karp; Christina M Kennedy; David Kleijn; Claire Kremen; Douglas A Landis; Deborah K Letourneau; Lorenzo Marini; Katja Poveda; Romina Rader; Henrik G Smith; Teja Tscharntke; Georg K S Andersson; Isabelle Badenhausser; Svenja Baensch; Antonio Diego M Bezerra; Felix J J A Bianchi; Virginie Boreux; Vincent Bretagnolle; Berta Caballero-Lopez; Pablo Cavigliasso; Aleksandar Ćetković; Natacha P Chacoff; Alice Classen; Sarah Cusser; Felipe D da Silva E Silva; G Arjen de Groot; Jan H Dudenhöffer; Johan Ekroos; Thijs Fijen; Pierre Franck; Breno M Freitas; Michael P D Garratt; Claudio Gratton; Juliana Hipólito; Andrea Holzschuh; Lauren Hunt; Aaron L Iverson; Shalene Jha; Tamar Keasar; Tania N Kim; Miriam Kishinevsky; Björn K Klatt; Alexandra-Maria Klein; Kristin M Krewenka; Smitha Krishnan; Ashley E Larsen; Claire Lavigne; Heidi Liere; Bea Maas; Rachel E Mallinger; Eliana Martinez Pachon; Alejandra Martínez-Salinas; Timothy D Meehan; Matthew G E Mitchell; Gonzalo A R Molina; Maike Nesper; Lovisa Nilsson; Megan E O'Rourke; Marcell K Peters; Milan Plećaš; Simon G Potts; Davi de L Ramos; Jay A Rosenheim; Maj Rundlöf; Adrien Rusch; Agustín Sáez; Jeroen Scheper; Matthias Schleuning; Julia M Schmack; Amber R Sciligo; Colleen Seymour; Dara A Stanley; Rebecca Stewart; Jane C Stout; Louis Sutter; Mayura B Takada; Hisatomo Taki; Giovanni Tamburini; Matthias Tschumi; Blandina F Viana; Catrin Westphal; Bryony K Willcox; Stephen D Wratten; Akira Yoshioka; Carlos Zaragoza-Trello; Wei Zhang; Yi Zou; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Soil fungal communities differ between shaded and sun-intensive coffee plantations in El Salvador.

Authors:  Maya V Rao; Robert A Rice; Robert C Fleischer; Carly R Muletz-Wolz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.