Literature DB >> 26373855

Pollinators, pests, and predators: Recognizing ecological trade-offs in agroecosystems.

Manu E Saunders1, Rebecca K Peisley2,3, Romina Rader4,5, Gary W Luck6.   

Abstract

Ecological interactions between crops and wild animals frequently result in increases or declines in crop yield. Yet, positive and negative interactions have mostly been treated independently, owing partly to disciplinary silos in ecological and agricultural sciences. We advocate a new integrated research paradigm that explicitly recognizes cost-benefit trade-offs among animal activities and acknowledges that these activities occur within social-ecological contexts. Support for this paradigm is presented in an evidence-based conceptual model structured around five evidence statements highlighting emerging trends applicable to sustainable agriculture. The full range of benefits and costs associated with animal activities in agroecosystems cannot be quantified by focusing on single species groups, crops, or systems. Management of productive agroecosystems should sustain cycles of ecological interactions between crops and wild animals, not isolate these cycles from the system. Advancing this paradigm will therefore require integrated studies that determine net returns of animal activity in agroecosystems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agroecology; Animal–plant interactions; Cost-benefit analysis; Ecosystem services; Sustainable agriculture

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26373855      PMCID: PMC4709359          DOI: 10.1007/s13280-015-0696-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  21 in total

Review 1.  Meeting the demand for crop production: the challenge of yield decline in crops grown in short rotations.

Authors:  Amanda J Bennett; Gary D Bending; David Chandler; Sally Hilton; Peter Mills
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2011-06-01

2.  Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa.

Authors:  Dan F B Flynn; Melanie Gogol-Prokurat; Theresa Nogeire; Nicole Molinari; Bárbara Trautman Richers; Brenda B Lin; Nicholas Simpson; Margaret M Mayfield; Fabrice DeClerck
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Insecticides suppress natural enemies and increase pest damage in cabbage.

Authors:  Riccardo Bommarco; Freddy Miranda; Helena Bylund; Christer Björkman
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 4.  Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security.

Authors:  Riccardo Bommarco; David Kleijn; Simon G Potts
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Buttercup squash provides a marketable alternative to blue hubbard as a trap crop for control of striped cucumber beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).

Authors:  Andrew F Cavanagh; Lynn S Adler; Ruth V Hazzard
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.377

6.  Natural and within-farmland biodiversity enhances crop productivity.

Authors:  Luísa Gigante Carvalheiro; Ruan Veldtman; Awraris Getachew Shenkute; Gebreamlak Bezabih Tesfay; Christian Walter Werner Pirk; John Sydney Donaldson; Susan Wendy Nicolson
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance.

Authors:  Lucas A Garibaldi; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Rachael Winfree; Marcelo A Aizen; Riccardo Bommarco; Saul A Cunningham; Claire Kremen; Luísa G Carvalheiro; Lawrence D Harder; Ohad Afik; Ignasi Bartomeus; Faye Benjamin; Virginie Boreux; Daniel Cariveau; Natacha P Chacoff; Jan H Dudenhöffer; Breno M Freitas; Jaboury Ghazoul; Sarah Greenleaf; Juliana Hipólito; Andrea Holzschuh; Brad Howlett; Rufus Isaacs; Steven K Javorek; Christina M Kennedy; Kristin M Krewenka; Smitha Krishnan; Yael Mandelik; Margaret M Mayfield; Iris Motzke; Theodore Munyuli; Brian A Nault; Mark Otieno; Jessica Petersen; Gideon Pisanty; Simon G Potts; Romina Rader; Taylor H Ricketts; Maj Rundlöf; Colleen L Seymour; Christof Schüepp; Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi; Hisatomo Taki; Teja Tscharntke; Carlos H Vergara; Blandina F Viana; Thomas C Wanger; Catrin Westphal; Neal Williams; Alexandra M Klein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Declines in insectivorous birds are associated with high neonicotinoid concentrations.

Authors:  Caspar A Hallmann; Ruud P B Foppen; Chris A M van Turnhout; Hans de Kroon; Eelke Jongejans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  When ecosystem services interact: crop pollination benefits depend on the level of pest control.

Authors:  Ola Lundin; Henrik G Smith; Maj Rundlöf; Riccardo Bommarco
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Risks of large-scale use of systemic insecticides to ecosystem functioning and services.

Authors:  Madeleine Chagnon; David Kreutzweiser; Edward A D Mitchell; Christy A Morrissey; Dominique A Noome; Jeroen P Van der Sluijs
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 4.223

View more
  11 in total

1.  Interacting pest control and pollination services in coffee systems.

Authors:  Alejandra Martínez-Salinas; Adina Chain-Guadarrama; Natalia Aristizábal; Sergio Vilchez-Mendoza; Rolando Cerda; Taylor H Ricketts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Cost-benefit trade-offs of bird activity in apple orchards.

Authors:  Rebecca K Peisley; Manu E Saunders; Gary W Luck
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Combining Costs and Benefits of Animal Activities to Assess Net Yield Outcomes in Apple Orchards.

Authors:  Manu E Saunders; Gary W Luck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  From food to pest: Conversion factors determine switches between ecosystem services and disservices.

Authors:  Laura Vang Rasmussen; Andreas E Christensen; Finn Danielsen; Neil Dawson; Adrian Martin; Ole Mertz; Thomas Sikor; Sithong Thongmanivong; Pheang Xaydongvanh
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Schistocerca piceifrons piceifrons (Orthoptera: Acrididae) as a Source of Compounds of Biotechnological and Nutritional Interest.

Authors:  Rogelio Pérez-Ramírez; Jorge Ariel Torres-Castillo; Ludivina Barrientos-Lozano; Pedro Almaguer-Sierra; Reyna Ivonne Torres-Acosta
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 1.857

6.  Mutualism increases diversity, stability, and function of multiplex networks that integrate pollinators into food webs.

Authors:  Kayla R S Hale; Fernanda S Valdovinos; Neo D Martinez
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Insect pest damage increases faba bean (Vicia faba) yield components but only in the absence of insect pollination.

Authors:  Laura G A Riggi; Chloé A Raderschall; Ola Lundin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Establishing Wildflower Pollinator Habitats in Agricultural Farmland to Provide Multiple Ecosystem Services.

Authors:  C Sheena Sidhu; Neelendra K Joshi
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 9.  Enhancing Legume Ecosystem Services through an Understanding of Plant-Pollinator Interplay.

Authors:  María J Suso; Penelope J Bebeli; Stefanie Christmann; Célia Mateus; Valeria Negri; Miguel A A Pinheiro de Carvalho; Renzo Torricelli; Maria M Veloso
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Prey use by dingoes in a contested landscape: Ecosystem service provider or biodiversity threat?

Authors:  Damian S Morrant; Christopher M Wurster; Christopher N Johnson; James R A Butler; Bradley C Congdon
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.