| Literature DB >> 24499961 |
C Arens1, F Uhle, M Wolff, R Röhrig, C Koch, A Schulte, S Weiterer, M Henrich, M A Weigand, K-D Schlüter, C Lichtenstern.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Candida infections represent a relevant risk for patients in intensive care units resulting in increased mortality. Echinocandins have become the agents of choice for early and specific antifungal treatment in critically ill patients. Due to cardiac effects following echinocandin administration seen in intensive care unit (ICU) patients the in vitro effects of echinocandins and fluconazole on isolated cardiomyocytes of the rat were examined. AIM: The study was designed to investigate a possible impact of echinocandins and fluconazole in clinically relevant concentrations on the in vitro contractile responsiveness and shape of isolated rat cardiomyocytes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24499961 PMCID: PMC3921465 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-014-2289-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anaesthesist ISSN: 0003-2417 Impact factor: 1.041
Fig. 1Effect of different antifungal preparations and concentrations on cellular parameters of isolated rat cardiomyocytes. a Contractility responsiveness measured as shortening ratio (dL/L). Graphs show mean values ± standard deviation. b Single cell observation of contractility at 3.3 and 10 µg/ml versus controls. c Rounded cells (grey bars) and rod-shaped cells (white bars) were counted. d Representive micrograph of culture dish following high-dose echinocandins given in culture medium containing 10 mg/ml albumin. Middle picture: overview, top and bottom: magnified areas of overview picture. Black line depicts limits of impact area
Values of mean contractility (mean dL/L), standard deviation (SD), number of cells (N) and significance compared to control for all concentrations and preparations
| Concentration (µg/ml]) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.1 | 1 | 3.3 | 10 | 33 | 100 | ||
| Anidulafungin | Mean dL/L | 7.899 | 8.096 | 8.970 | 9.479 | 9.627 | ||
| SD | 2.101 | 1.964 | 2.164 | 2.646 | 2.800 | |||
| N | 54 | 54 | 44 | 54 | 37 | |||
| Significance vs. control | ns | ns | ns | ** | ** | |||
| Caspofungin | Mean dL/L | 8.053 | 8.359 | 7.951 | 7.095 | 4.834 | ||
| SD | 1.923 | 2.372 | 2.191 | 1.944 | 2.079 | |||
| N | 54 | 54 | 54 | 54 | 54 | |||
| Significance vs. control | ns | ns | ns | ns | *** | |||
| Micafungin | Mean dL/L | 8.033 | 7.791 | 7.796 | 9.436 | 10.01 | 10.71 | |
| SD | 2.333 | 1.775 | 2.024 | 2.350 | 3.156 | 3.196 | ||
| N | 54 | 54 | 54 | 54 | 53 | 54 | ||
| Significance vs. control | ns | ns | ns | * | *** | *** | ||
| Fluconazole | Mean dL/L | 10.14 | 10.55 | 10.28 | 9.784 | 9.518 |
|
|
| SD | 2.636 | 1.990 | 2.588 | 2.709 | 2.585 |
|
| |
| N | 54 | 54 | 54 | 54 | 54 |
|
| |
| Significance vs. control | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| |
Blank cells are depicted where no measurements were possible, italics indicate differential treatment regarding fluconazole concentration (33 = 20 µg/ml and 100 µg/ml concentration was achieved by adding five times the volume of solution than other treatments)ns not significant*p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.001, ***p ≤ 0.0001
Values of cell morphology (% rounded), standard deviation (SD) and number of cells (N) evaluated for all concentrations and preparations
| Concentration (µg/ml) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.1 | 1 | 3.3 | 10 | 33 | 100 | ||
| Anidulafungin | % Rounded | 48.1 | 44.3 | 53.5 | 49.7 | 47.3 | 86.6 | 99.8 |
| SD | 13.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | |
| N | 496 | 443 | 498 | 481 | 557 | 591 | 612 | |
| Caspofungin | % Rounded | 49.7 | 44.1 | 54.0 | 63.6 | 73.1 | 97.2 | 100 |
| SD | 11.5 | 12.0 | 17.9 | 17.5 | 9.0 | 3.3 | – | |
| N | 474 | 440 | 433 | 423 | 431 | 515 | 441 | |
| Micafungin | % Rounded | 45.4 | 47.5 | 50.9 | 49.5 | 44.1 | 66.4 | 95.3 |
| SD | 7.5 | 12.5 | 17.2 | 10.0 | 16.4 | 10.9 | 3.2 | |
| N | 495 | 491 | 526 | 492 | 474 | 476 | 476 | |
| Fluconazole | % Rounded | 51.7 | 53.3 | 51.9 | 48.1 | 56.1 |
|
|
| SD | 12.6 | 9.5 | 10.3 | 7.6 | 16.5 |
|
| |
| N | 403 | 426 | 481 | 430 | 474 |
|
| |
Figures in italics indicate differential treatment regarding fluconazole concentration (33 = 20 µg/ml and 100 µg/ml concentration was achieved by adding five times the volume of solution than other treatments)