Literature DB >> 24499379

Selection, use, choice and occupancy: clarifying concepts in resource selection studies.

Subhash R Lele1, Evelyn H Merrill, Jonah Keim, Mark S Boyce.   

Abstract

1. During the last decade, there has been a proliferation of statistical methods for studying resource selection by animals. While statistical techniques are advancing at a fast pace, there is confusion in the conceptual understanding of the meaning of various quantities that these statistical techniques provide. 2. Terms such as selection, choice, use, occupancy and preference often are employed as if they are synonymous. Many practitioners are unclear about the distinctions between different concepts such as 'probability of selection,' 'probability of use,' 'choice probabilities' and 'probability of occupancy'. 3. Similarly, practitioners are not always clear about the differences between and relevance of 'relative probability of selection' vs. 'probability of selection' to effective management. 4. Practitioners also are unaware that they are using only a single statistical model for modelling resource selection, namely the exponential probability of selection, when other models might be more appropriate. Currently, such multimodel inference is lacking in the resource selection literature. 5. In this paper, we attempt to clarify the concepts and terminology used in animal resource studies by illustrating the relationships among these various concepts and providing their statistical underpinnings.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society.

Keywords:  habitat suitability; occupancy; presence‐only data; step selection functions; telemetry; weighted distributions

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24499379     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  44 in total

1.  Hourly movement decisions indicate how a large carnivore inhabits developed landscapes.

Authors:  Michael J Evans; Jason E Hawley; Paul W Rego; Tracy A G Rittenhouse
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Home ranges, habitat and body mass: simple correlates of home range size in ungulates.

Authors:  Endre Grüner Ofstad; Ivar Herfindal; Erling Johan Solberg; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Robustness of movement models: can models bridge the gap between temporal scales of data sets and behavioural processes?

Authors:  Ulrike E Schlägel; Mark A Lewis
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Seasonality and microhabitat selection in a forest-dwelling salamander.

Authors:  Marco Basile; Antonio Romano; Andrea Costa; Mario Posillico; Daniele Scinti Roger; Aldo Crisci; Ranieri Raimondi; Tiziana Altea; Vittorio Garfì; Giovanni Santopuoli; Marco Marchetti; Sebastiano Salvidio; Bruno De Cinti; Giorgio Matteucci
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-09-12

5.  Invariant polar bear habitat selection during a period of sea ice loss.

Authors:  Ryan R Wilson; Eric V Regehr; Karyn D Rode; Michelle St Martin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Intrapopulation differences in polar bear movement and step selection patterns.

Authors:  Ryan R Wilson; Michelle St Martin; Eric V Regehr; Karyn D Rode
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 5.253

7.  Trunk picking from a truncating menu: Dry season forage selection by Asian elephant in a multi-use landscape.

Authors:  Priyanka Das; Aritra Kshettry; H N Kumara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Environmental and anthropogenic influences on movement and foraging in a critically endangered lemur species, Propithecus tattersalli: implications for habitat conservation planning.

Authors:  Meredith A Semel; Heather N Abernathy; Brandon P Semel; Michael J Cherry; Tsioriniaina J C Ratovoson; Ignacio T Moore
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 5.253

9.  Detecting grizzly bear use of ungulate carcasses using global positioning system telemetry and activity data.

Authors:  Michael R Ebinger; Mark A Haroldson; Frank T van Manen; Cecily M Costello; Daniel D Bjornlie; Daniel J Thompson; Kerry A Gunther; Jennifer K Fortin; Justin E Teisberg; Shannon R Pils; P J White; Steven L Cain; Paul C Cross
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Anticipation of common buzzard population patterns in the changing UK landscape.

Authors:  Eduardo M Arraut; Sean W Walls; David W Macdonald; Robert E Kenward
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.