Literature DB >> 26971522

Detecting grizzly bear use of ungulate carcasses using global positioning system telemetry and activity data.

Michael R Ebinger1,2,3, Mark A Haroldson4, Frank T van Manen4, Cecily M Costello5,6, Daniel D Bjornlie7, Daniel J Thompson7, Kerry A Gunther8, Jennifer K Fortin5,9, Justin E Teisberg9,10, Shannon R Pils4,11, P J White12, Steven L Cain13,14, Paul C Cross4.   

Abstract

Global positioning system (GPS) wildlife collars have revolutionized wildlife research. Studies of predation by free-ranging carnivores have particularly benefited from the application of location clustering algorithms to determine when and where predation events occur. These studies have changed our understanding of large carnivore behavior, but the gains have concentrated on obligate carnivores. Facultative carnivores, such as grizzly/brown bears (Ursus arctos), exhibit a variety of behaviors that can lead to the formation of GPS clusters. We combined clustering techniques with field site investigations of grizzly bear GPS locations (n = 732 site investigations; 2004-2011) to produce 174 GPS clusters where documented behavior was partitioned into five classes (large-biomass carcass, small-biomass carcass, old carcass, non-carcass activity, and resting). We used multinomial logistic regression to predict the probability of clusters belonging to each class. Two cross-validation methods-leaving out individual clusters, or leaving out individual bears-showed that correct prediction of bear visitation to large-biomass carcasses was 78-88 %, whereas the false-positive rate was 18-24 %. As a case study, we applied our predictive model to a GPS data set of 266 bear-years in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (2002-2011) and examined trends in carcass visitation during fall hyperphagia (September-October). We identified 1997 spatial GPS clusters, of which 347 were predicted to be large-biomass carcasses. We used the clustered data to develop a carcass visitation index, which varied annually, but more than doubled during the study period. Our study demonstrates the effectiveness and utility of identifying GPS clusters associated with carcass visitation by a facultative carnivore.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carcass visitation; GPS  Cluster; Multinomial model; Prediction; Ursus arctos

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26971522     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-016-3594-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  19 in total

1.  Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology.

Authors:  Mark Hebblewhite; Daniel T Haydon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Global positioning system and associated technologies in animal behaviour and ecological research.

Authors:  Stanley M Tomkiewicz; Mark R Fuller; John G Kie; Kirk K Bates
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Francesca Cagnacci; Luigi Boitani; Roger A Powell; Mark S Boyce
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Probable causes of increasing brucellosis in free-ranging elk of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.

Authors:  P C Cross; E K Cole; A P Dobson; W H Edwards; K L Hamlin; G Luikart; A D Middleton; B M Scurlock; P J White
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Selection, use, choice and occupancy: clarifying concepts in resource selection studies.

Authors:  Subhash R Lele; Evelyn H Merrill; Jonah Keim; Mark S Boyce
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 6.  Dangers of using "optimal" cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors.

Authors:  D G Altman; B Lausen; W Sauerbrei; M Schumacher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Methods for assessing movement path recursion with application to African buffalo in South Africa.

Authors:  Shirli Bar-David; Israel Bar-David; Paul C Cross; Sadie J Ryan; Christiane U Knechtel; Wayne M Getz
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  What to eat now? Shifts in polar bear diet during the ice-free season in western Hudson Bay.

Authors:  Linda J Gormezano; Robert F Rockwell
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Whitebark pine, population density, and home-range size of grizzly bears in the greater yellowstone ecosystem.

Authors:  Daniel D Bjornlie; Frank T Van Manen; Michael R Ebinger; Mark A Haroldson; Daniel J Thompson; Cecily M Costello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Seasonal foraging ecology of non-migratory cougars in a system with migrating prey.

Authors:  L Mark Elbroch; Patrick E Lendrum; Jesse Newby; Howard Quigley; Derek Craighead
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Variable strategies to solve risk-reward tradeoffs in carnivore communities.

Authors:  Joel Ruprecht; Charlotte E Eriksson; Tavis D Forrester; Derek B Spitz; Darren A Clark; Michael J Wisdom; Marcus Bianco; Mary M Rowland; Joshua B Smith; Bruce K Johnson; Taal Levi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Space-time clusters for early detection of grizzly bear predation.

Authors:  Joseph Kermish-Wells; Alessandro Massolo; Gordon B Stenhouse; Terrence A Larsen; Marco Musiani
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Physiological consequences of consuming low-energy foods: herbivory coincides with a stress response in Yellowstone bears.

Authors:  David Christianson; Tyler H Coleman; Quint Doan; Mark A Haroldson
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.079

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.